Here's the major problem ... Barry was awful.
You guys complaining about the fix being in, and the BoT being some corrupt entity ruining the college and stuffing their pockets ... and how they kept Barry down because of this ...
But there's no real evidence of any of this.
It's as if you were convinced your local food pantry was stealing the food that was donated to them, at the behest of those in charge, and not giving the food to those in need ... your evidence of this was tenuous at best ... mostly just telling each other stories about how you were convinced this was true .. and so you ... for some odd reason ... decided to send in the ranting town drunk to sus it out. When the town drunk would barge in, he'd rant and yell about how the food pantry was out to get people, and everyone involved was a criminal ... but most of all, he'd just continually shout how they needed to change the name of the food pantry to acknowledge the best volunteer that ever volunteered at the pantry. He'd curse out, as town drunks do, anyone who told him to calm down. He'd never stop his rants, despite pleas to relax, until he passed out.
And then, whenever they attempted to control him, or throw him out, everyone says this is further evidence of corruption.
In the meetings that were on video, you saw how Barry acted. It was obviously wrong, and these rants weren't meant to be supportive of change, or even informative. It was just off-topic rants that rambled. It wasn't effective. It wasn't constructive.
And then you guys respond to this with "I knew it! No matter what we do, they don't want to hear our voices! They're just going to keep stealing food and failing to rename the place!"
www.statecollege.com
