What a disaster she's been in every sense of the word.Ali Krieger was absent (shocking, I know).
What a disaster she's been in every sense of the word.Ali Krieger was absent (shocking, I know).
Here's the major problem ... Barry was awful.
You guys complaining about the fix being in, and the BoT being some corrupt entity ruining the college and stuffing their pockets ... and how they kept Barry down because of this ...
But there's no real evidence of any of this.
It's as if you were convinced your local food pantry was stealing the food that was donated to them, at the behest of those in charge, and not giving the food to those in need ... your evidence of this was tenuous at best ... mostly just telling each other stories about how you were convinced this was true .. and so you ... for some odd reason ... decided to send in the ranting town drunk to sus it out. When the town drunk would barge in, he'd rant and yell about how the food pantry was out to get people, and everyone involved was a criminal ... but most of all, he'd just continually shout how they needed to change the name of the food pantry to acknowledge the best volunteer that ever volunteered at the pantry. He'd curse out, as town drunks do, anyone who told him to calm down. He'd never stop his rants, despite pleas to relax, until he passed out.
And then, whenever they attempted to control him, or throw him out, everyone says this is further evidence of corruption.
In the meetings that were on video, you saw how Barry acted. It was obviously wrong, and these rants weren't meant to be supportive of change, or even informative. It was just off-topic rants that rambled. It wasn't effective. It wasn't constructive.
And then you guys respond to this with "I knew it! No matter what we do, they don't want to hear our voices! They're just going to keep stealing food and failing to rename the place!"
Good for them. Smart move removing Fenchak.![]()
Penn State Board Schedules Vote on Removing Trustee Barry Fenchak
Updated 10:14 p.m. Saturday, June 14 with comments from Barry Fenchak. Penn State's Board of Trustees has scheduled a meeting to vote on the removal ofwww.statecollege.com
That's deep and dark, Acho“Probably “ - don’t be so wishy washy. We are considered lower than the lowest bucket of whale poop in the deepest part of the ocean …,
She only participates on days when the sun rises in the west. President’s Tailgates are another story.Ali Krieger was absent (shocking, I know).
Yet another monikerGood for them. Smart move removing Fenchak.
You should run for the BOT....you'd fit right in. Some of the complicit BOT members might need some of your micro-loans.Here's the major problem ... Barry was awful.
You guys complaining about the fix being in, and the BoT being some corrupt entity ruining the college and stuffing their pockets ... and how they kept Barry down because of this ...
But there's no real evidence of any of this.
It's as if you were convinced your local food pantry was stealing the food that was donated to them, at the behest of those in charge, and not giving the food to those in need ... your evidence of this was tenuous at best ... mostly just telling each other stories about how you were convinced this was true .. and so you ... for some odd reason ... decided to send in the ranting town drunk to sus it out. When the town drunk would barge in, he'd rant and yell about how the food pantry was out to get people, and everyone involved was a criminal ... but most of all, he'd just continually shout how they needed to change the name of the food pantry to acknowledge the best volunteer that ever volunteered at the pantry. He'd curse out, as town drunks do, anyone who told him to calm down. He'd never stop his rants, despite pleas to relax, until he passed out.
And then, whenever they attempted to control him, or throw him out, everyone says this is further evidence of corruption.
In the meetings that were on video, you saw how Barry acted. It was obviously wrong, and these rants weren't meant to be supportive of change, or even informative. It was just off-topic rants that rambled. It wasn't effective. It wasn't constructive.
And then you guys respond to this with "I knew it! No matter what we do, they don't want to hear our voices! They're just going to keep stealing food and failing to rename the place!"
Effective or not (it’s not for me to say), Barry was the only one up there taking the pitches. I felt then and I feel now that the PSU community needed someone to push the board the way Barry intended to, tried to. We knew what we were getting when we first elected Barry, and I have zero regrets voting for him.

I truly believe this. Some guy on the internet saying "I don't think they're being forthright ... therefore, they're corrupt" and then a bunch of other guys yelling "yeah, corrupt! corrupt! corrupt!" isn't really convincing evidence.If you truly believe this, please get some help. That's next level of delusional.
Per chance, would your "financial firm" be benefiting from PSU's endowment investments?I truly believe this. Some guy on the internet saying "I don't think they're being forthright ... therefore, they're corrupt" and then a bunch of other guys yelling "yeah, corrupt! corrupt! corrupt!" isn't really convincing evidence.
Why? His term had two weeks to run. What a waste of time.Good for them. Smart move removing Fenchak.
Per chance, would your "financial firm" be benefiting from PSU's endowment investments?
I believe those in control of the BOT view her as the gold standard for an alumni repWhat a disaster she's been in every sense of the word.
The guy is like a racoon at a wedding. Just get it out!Why? His term had two weeks to run. What a waste of time.