FC: Interesting

WestSideLion

All-American
May 29, 2001
4,692
5,159
113
Super interesting, thanks. A couple of quick observations:
  • Conferences outside the B1G and SEC seem to be in worse financial situations. That lends to the lack of sustainability narrative we’ve heard.
  • Power football programs in the B1G and SEC are surprisingly high on these lists. Look at Bama and OSU. Should PSU push for more contributions?
 

doctornick

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
639
1,000
93
That being said, I can honestly say that schools that have big time sports/school spirit does seem like something that drives a significant number of applications/acceptances. It’s a lot of those big time Div 1 schools that were reporting record number of applications this year while smaller schools are struggling and closing. I would imagine that a lot of schools view this “subsidy” as just a PR and advertising expense the same way that tuition from current student also subsidizes the tens of thousands of mailers that schools send out and other methods of engagement with potential students.
 

psuro

Heisman
Aug 24, 2001
8,932
19,538
113
Super interesting, thanks. A couple of quick observations:
  • Conferences outside the B1G and SEC seem to be in worse financial situations. That lends to the lack of sustainability narrative we’ve heard.
  • Power football programs in the B1G and SEC are surprisingly high on these lists. Look at Bama and OSU. Should PSU push for more contributions?
The CUSA numbers are sobering. Within the Big Ten, the UCLA numbers are eye opening.

As far as PSU, there appears to be room for more of a contribution - however I believe the athletic department is separate from the university budget. Not sure what the $243/student for PSU is for, but assuming that low rate is for administrative costs assigned to each student.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WestSideLion

LB99

Heisman
Oct 27, 2021
9,100
12,726
113
That being said, I can honestly say that schools that have big time sports/school spirit does seem like something that drives a significant number of applications/acceptances. It’s a lot of those big time Div 1 schools that were reporting record number of applications this year while smaller schools are struggling and closing. I would imagine that a lot of schools view this “subsidy” as just a PR and advertising expense the same way that tuition from current student also subsidizes the tens of thousands of mailers that schools send out and other methods of engagement with potential students.
You are correct. Alabama has grown tremendously since the success they had under Saban.


 

Roar More

All-Conference
Oct 30, 2021
635
1,485
93
Since the PSU athletic budget is self funding, the PSU costs probably reflect student ticket prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EPC FAN

BobPSU92

Heisman
Aug 22, 2001
42,481
33,060
113
You are correct. Alabama has grown tremendously since the success they had under Saban.



Will DeBoer erase it all?

o_O
 

Tgar

Heisman
Nov 14, 2001
5,918
13,497
113
Another data point that would be helpful is full time tuition, room and board To provide some context to additional cost burden. Many of those public universities are way less expensive than Penn State.
 

BobPSU92

Heisman
Aug 22, 2001
42,481
33,060
113
Another data point that would be helpful is full time tuition, room and board To provide some context to additional cost burden. Many of those public universities are way less expensive than Penn State.

Thanks. I got confused by all the numbers and graphs in the original post and couldn’t figure out how it was bad for PSU.

😞
 
  • Like
Reactions: SleepyLion and LB99

WestSideLion

All-American
May 29, 2001
4,692
5,159
113
The CUSA numbers are sobering. Within the Big Ten, the UCLA numbers are eye opening.

As far as PSU, there appears to be room for more of a contribution - however I believe the athletic department is separate from the university budget. Not sure what the $243/student for PSU is for, but assuming that low rate is for administrative costs assigned to each student.
I have no idea how the cost accounting works here. There’s likely a fudge factor. Dr Nick makes a great point about football driving applications and enrollment. This may be seen as marketing at many schools.
 

doctornick

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
639
1,000
93
Another data point that would be helpful is full time tuition, room and board To provide some context to additional cost burden. Many of those public universities are way less expensive than Penn State.
In state sure - although the difference is not as substantial as it used to be as college costs have risen across the board everywhere; now the couple of thousand dollars difference for PSU compared to other flagships is a smaller percentage of overall costs than years ago.

But out of state, PSU is pretty much the same as other schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LB99

doctornick

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
639
1,000
93
I'm confused why PSU students pay any subsidy. I've read that PSU (and about 20 other D1 schools) made a net profit from athletics. Is the $200 what students pay out of pocket for tickets? Is that considered a subsidy?

Penn State Athletics reported $220.7 million in operating revenue and $215.1 million in expenses, resulting in a net profit of $5.6 million1
I was wondering that as well. Is there an article attached to the tweet in some fashion that goes into detail regarding how these “subsidies” are calculated by the author?
 

Bison13

All-Conference
May 26, 2013
2,901
4,638
113

Tgar

Heisman
Nov 14, 2001
5,918
13,497
113
In state sure - although the difference is not as substantial as it used to be as college costs have risen across the board everywhere; now the couple of thousand dollars difference for PSU compared to other flagships is a smaller percentage of overall costs than years ago.

But out of state, PSU is pretty much the same as other schools.
University of Tennessee says hello.

In-state tuition 13,484 USD, Out-of-state tuition 31,974 USD
 

doctornick

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
639
1,000
93
Is it using the student activity fee as the ‘subsidy’?
That would seem to jive. From what I see online, the UP Student Activity Fee is $289 a year. PSU likely uses part of that to pay the Athletic Dept on behalf of the students in order for them to get "perks" like free tickets to most sporting events and maybe stuff like being able to use Rec Hall. That would be consistent with collecting $243 per student as listed in the tweet since not all of the Student Activity fee would be going to athletics.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bison13