FC/OT: College Football ‘Super League’ and the future of college football…

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
7,743
12,516
113
Interesting article from The Atheltic:


Several college presidents, Roger Goodell’s primary lieutenant at the NFL and some of sports’ top executives have devised a plan — dubbed by outsiders as a “Super League” — to completely transform college football, those involved in the group “College Sports Tomorrow” (CST) told The Athletic. Although the plan has drawn skepticism from within the sport’s current institutions, the people behind the ideas believe they must be implemented.

“The current model for governing and managing college athletics is dead,” Syracusechancellor Kent Syverud told The Athleticduring an interview.

West Virginia president Gordon Gee added, “We are in an existential crisis.”

Syverud and Gee are part of CST, a 20-person group which also includes the NFL’s No. 2 executive Brian Rolapp, Philadelphia 76ers owner David Blitzer and lead organizer Len Perna of TurnkeyZRG, the search firm that places nearly all the top conference commissioners, including recently the Big Ten’s Tony Petitti.

They are trying to implement a drastically new system that would replace the NCAA and the College Football Playoff and potentially provide a solution for the hurricane of current and future lawsuits aimed at the business of the sport, plus the NIL and transfer portal issues that, they believe, have put college athletics as a whole in peril.

The current CST outline would create a system that would have the top 70 programs — all members of the five former major conferences, plus Notre Dame and new ACC member SMU — as permanent members and encompass all 130-plus FBS universities.

The perpetual members would be in seven 10-team divisions, joined by an eighth division of teams that would be promoted from the second tier.

The 50-plus second-division teams would have the opportunity to compete their way into the upper division, creating a promotion system similar to the structure in European football leagues. The 70 permanent teams would never be in danger of moving down, while the second division would have the incentive of promotion and relegation.

The playoffs would not require a selection committee, as the eight division winners and eight wild cards from the top tier would go to the postseason. The wild-card spots would be determined by record and tiebreakers, much like the NFL.

CST borrows ideas from leagues like the NFL, Premier League and MLS to create a system that they believe would bring more television value and sustainability. Not coincidentally, some of its most influential members have direct ties to those leagues.

Thus far, the group is struggling to gain traction with the schools that would play in their proposed “Super League.” The ACC board of directors heard a presentation from the group in February. However, planned dinners with administrators from the Big Ten, SEC and Big 12 all were called off. Spokespersons for the Big Ten and SEC said commissioners Petitti and Greg Sankey, respectively, have not met with Perna’s group.

Leagues have been hesitant and canceled meetings so as not to upset their current broadcast partners, including ESPN and Fox, according to one executive briefed on the commissioners’ thoughts.

Chief among the obstacles this new venture faces are the billions of dollars in TV deals that all the top conferences have locked in with the major networks: ESPN/ABC, Fox, NBC and CBS. The FBS conferences recently signed off on a six-year, $7.8 billion extension with ESPN for the exclusive rights to the expanded College Football Playoff.

The Big Ten’s deals run through the 2029-30 season, the Big 12’s run through 2030-31 and the SEC’s exclusive deal with ESPN runs through 2033-34. One TV executive called the idea that there is a lot more untapped money in the market “naive.” One CST executive said that the major networks with existing deals would likely need to buy into the plan before it could go to the open market in the 2030s.

https://theathletic.com/5383639/202...e-cst-realignment/?source=user_shared_articleInside the college football ‘Super League,’ one powerful group’s idea to fix a ‘dead’ system
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tgar

Grant Green

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,565
2,330
113
Not a surprise that the relegation element is in play. It's the one thing that Americans tend to all agree upon in regard to soccer premier leagues.
What I don't agree with is having 70 permanent members that can't be relegated. That means that there are 60 other teams that will eternally be treated as 2nd class citizens.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
1,449
1,141
113
What you'll never see is a proposal or a change that is in the interests of the STUDENT-ATHLETE first.

That would be silly.

Everything changes in order to bring in more money.

And all the fans are all about these changes ... and then they cry when student-athletes, who largely aren't real "students" at all, want money and the opportunity to move around to different programs.

It's insanity.

Force every major program to fund a separate "walk-on" club-level team that plays geographical neighbors. At least then we can get some actual college athletics. Don't even force football players on the "big clubs" to attend school ... give them a voucher good for 4 years of free education that they can use, or not use, either concurrent with their participation in the football program, or until some point after ... and let's just have this openly be what it is.
 
Last edited:

NoSoup4U

Active member
Oct 14, 2021
236
370
63
Why wouldnt the TV deals just transfer over?? you still would have divisions those TV deals could cover x number of those.. EG Mid Atlantic/Mid West Divisions (20 Teams[aka the Big 10 and others]) would be covered by the current Big Ten Deal

sure Im making it simplistic but it could be done but it shouldn't be that hard to envision as a model until the contracts run out