First place B1G

[FrankZ_RU93]

Now let’s finish there

 

[ScarletDave]

5 teams at 3-1 - RU, PU, UM, MSU, and UW .. only ones that have played each other is MSU beat UM and we beat Purdue. So in theory MSU and RU are tied for P1. It doesn’t reflect that on the B1G website but it should be this way I think

 

[mikebal9]

4-0*

 

[motorb54]

That is correct Dave but too many games to go for them to get into tiebreakers

 

[Scangg]

5 teams at 3-1 - RU, PU, UM, MSU, and UW .. only ones that have played each other is MSU beat UM and we beat Purdue. So in theory MSU and RU are tied for P1. It doesn’t reflect that on the B1G website but it should be this way I think

Might be why ESPN has MSU listed first and RU second

 

[RUJMM78]

4-0*

There should be a asterisk next to Rutgers and Ohio State when final league rankings are determined.League officials stated a Ohio State player was out of bounds before the winning pass and basket was made.

 

[RUTrack94]

Bump

 

[ScarletKid2008]

So so early. Every game is a potential opportunity or trap. 1-14 is a grind to get the W. But I like our chances and our start !

 

[NiTeKnight]

Aren't we in first place if we beat Iowa tomorrow and go to 4-1 in conference?

 

[armenius]

5 teams at 3-1 - RU, PU, UM, MSU, and UW .. only ones that have played each other is MSU beat UM and we beat Purdue. So in theory MSU and RU are tied for P1. It doesn’t reflect that on the B1G website but it should be this way I think

We are both 1-0 against the 3-1 teams and 0-1 against the 2-1 teams. Michigan State is 1-0 against the 2-2 team (Penn State), while we haven't played them, so 0-0. This is why Michigan State is listed first on ESPN and we are in second. Win tomorrow and we overtake them.

 

[Colbert17!]

Aren't we in first place if we beat Iowa tomorrow and go to 4-1 in conference?

Yes but I rather it be that way on March 8 instead of January 8.

 

[NiTeKnight]

Yes but I rather it be that way on March 8 instead of January 8.

Me too, of course!