For the offensive Gurus

RVSooner

Well-known member
Oct 10, 2015
860
1,195
93
So watching Stanford blow their opportunity, I can't help but wonder why teams continually do this. In short yardage situations, they always decide to run up the middle. When all the players on the field are concentrated in the middle, this seems like a low percentage play. What is the rational for this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1

CTOkie

New member
Sep 20, 2001
16,343
8,933
0
Yes, that logic eluded me, especially with Stanford's top running back playing injured.....and with so much time left, why not tie the game at 24-24 ?
Stanford's offensive line looked tired late in the game.
I was not impressed with either team and I hope OU never even considers moving to the PAC12.
 

soonerinlOUisiana

New member
May 29, 2004
29,093
26,765
0
So watching Stanford blow their opportunity, I can't help but wonder why teams continually do this. In short yardage situations, they always decide to run up the middle. When all the players on the field are concentrated in the middle, this seems like a low percentage play. What is the rational for this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1

soonerinlOUisiana

New member
May 29, 2004
29,093
26,765
0
On the other hand, they probably know that you know that they'll be playing to stop the run, so they'll expect some sort of misdirection or pass and plan accordingly, but then again........

 

runningback43

New member
Oct 7, 2002
7,009
2,342
0
It's actually easier to stop somebody when they decide to run wide on short yardage. There's an extra defender when you run to the outside. String the play out and the sideline becomes that extra defender.
 

okie70

New member
Oct 9, 2001
5,656
1,419
0
Running wide on 4th & short didn't help the Huskers in '84. But probably right on most occasions. Disappointed Stanford didn't get it done. Darnold now a sure top 5 pic. Since he is 6 ft. 4. Forget the turnovers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1

mcbrider

New member
May 4, 2010
748
597
0
Running wide on 4th & short didn't help the Huskers in '84. But probably right on most occasions. Disappointed Stanford didn't get it done. Darnold now a sure top 5 pic. Since he is 6 ft. 4. Forget the turnovers.
Rodney Andersondiving over the goal line against West Virginia is a something that doesn’t seem to happen much anymore. Anyone remember Sam the bam Cunningham the USC tail back - signatures goal line move was to leap over the offensive line.
 
May 29, 2001
493
487
0
Steve Owens was famous for that in his time. I think he pre-dated Sam by a year or two...

Rodney Andersondiving over the goal line against West Virginia is a something that doesn’t seem to happen much anymore. Anyone remember Sam the bam Cunningham the USC tail back - signatures goal line move was to leap over the offensive line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iasooner1