Found this great article...

bigbluelou

All-American
Apr 13, 2011
9,274
5,560
0
Thanks, Bev...good article. Nice to see it coming from a different source.

I think the noise is actually starting to die down about this straw-man argument used to attack UK. People want to feign "outrage" over this rule an blame UK for bastardizing college bb. If they have a problem with it, they need to turn their anger toward the NBA, not UK.
 

fla.cat

Junior
May 23, 2002
3,981
351
0
Thanks for posting...thanks for doing the research.
It is threads like this that trump the many asinine threads that permeate the board, and make time spent here entertaining and fun.
 

Dutycat

Sophomore
Jan 3, 2003
6,002
128
0
Originally posted by Bkocats:

I like to peruse hometown newspapers, etc of opposing teams after a win (ok I admit, dont' do it after a loss, LOL) - was checking out "The State" which is a news homepage for the state of SC and found the following article. Would love to see this one on a national outlet

http://www.thestate.com/2015/01/23/3946175/morris-dont-hate-on-caliparis.html
Thanks Bkocats

Note to self. If you are picked in the first round, 29 is not a good number,

This post was edited on 1/24 10:50 PM by Dutycat
 

JPScott

All-American
Sep 16, 2001
7,671
7,355
62
Good article. One thing I would disagree with is when he wrote:

There are two ways to derail Calipari's railroading of players through Kentucky and onto the NBA. The first would be for the NBA to change its rule that calls for draft-eligible players to be at least 19 years old and be one year removed from high school. The other method would be for college coaches to begin out-recruiting Calipari for the nation's top high school talent.
Neither is going to happen anytime soon. NCAA members would like the NBA to return to its old rule of allowing high school graduates to be eligible for the draft. But the NBA appears to be OK with the way the rule stands now.
I don't believe most NCAA members want the NBA to return to the days where players can skip directly to the league. Instead they want these kids to come to their schools (or to at least attend other NCAA schools which enriches college basketball) so that their programs can be enriched, even if it is for a year or two. If anything, I think that many people who disagree with the one-and-done would rather see the time extended to at least two years before a player can leave the college ranks, rather than go the other way.

I think they would much rather have top players be forced to attend college for longer, rather than risk a situation where all the top players avoid the NCAA altogether, resulting in a step down in talent (which could result in a step down in interest and ultimately a step down in revenues, which is their ultimate interest.)