Very similar for me :
Midwest
1 - UK
2 - Kansas
West
1 - Villanova
2 - Arizona
South
1 - Duke
2 - Gonzaga
East
1 - Wisconsin
2 - Virginia
This is all predicated that Duke wins the ACCT and Wisconsin, Villanova and Arizona wins out. If UVA should win the ACCT, I think they would simply swap the seed order in the east with UVA as a #1 seed and Wisconsin as a 2 - I honestly think they could make a "plausible" case for that, because it falls within the realm of plausibility for the NCAAT SC to do that.
That's just the thing for me. We really have no idea how the SC has the brackets as of today. IMO, they can make it sound plausible to have Wisconsin and UVA as a the 1/2 in either order. I simply feel like they will put Kansas as the last #2 seed in our region. I've a feeling that they would do that because the rest of the nation wouldn't complain about KU being in our region to lose again (and it gives KU a chance to improve over what they did against us early in the year). The rest of the teams across the country would be more than happy to "divvy up" the rest of the seeding arrangements and not shed one tear over KU having to be put in our region as the 2 seed.
All just my opinion, of course. Personally, I hope it goes this way exactly for us, because I like the fact that they can put Wisconsin, UVA and Duke all on the other side of the bracket from us.
Will be interesting to see how they justify doing what they do when the time comes.
