From today's CDT:

PSUFTG

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,521
2,478
113
Letter to the Editor: Centre Daily Times.

Written by Dr Al Soyster, former department head at Penn State, and Dean of the College of Engineering at Northeastern.

"Penn State trustees continue to retaliate On Feb. 27 the Penn State board of trustees’ nominating subcommittee reviewed the qualifications of candidates seeking approval to be on the ballot in the upcoming alumni trustee election. Candidate approval by the nominating subcommittee is required by the revised and controversial July 2024 bylaws. For the first time ever, a candidate was disapproved — incumbent Barry Fenchak.

This, of course, is no surprise. Our board has censured Barry, discontinued his social privileges and planned a vote to expel him only to have Centre County Judge Brian Marshall censure our board for obvious retaliation. Judge Brian Marshall said, “Allowing his removal would recast a shadow over the financial operations of the defendants to the detriment of every Penn State stakeholder except those at the very top of PSU’s hierarchy.” In the same court order, Marshall said, “The Court has been presented with credible and, in many instances uncontroverted, evidence that Plaintiff (Barry) has been the subject to ongoing incidents of retaliation by Defendants ...”

The board’s hubris in denying a ballot position for incumbent Fenchak wreaks of further retaliation. Is our board so clueless and arrogant to ignore the gist of the judge’s ruling? What is so disheartening is that no one has worked harder than Barry to address our obvious budget woes ($100 million budget deficits, potential campus closures) and declining prestige (ranked last in Big 10 and 184/206 in U.S. News Best Value Universities.) Fenchak has consistently sought data and asked questions about financial and academic matters: a true “disruptor” challenging the status quo. Given our university’s woes, we need more Barrys, not fewer."

Read more at: https://centredaily.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article301169094.html#storylink=cpy
 

fairgambit

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,816
5,960
113
Letter to the Editor: Centre Daily Times.

Written by Dr Al Soyster, former department head at Penn State, and Dean of the College of Engineering at Northeastern.

"Penn State trustees continue to retaliate On Feb. 27 the Penn State board of trustees’ nominating subcommittee reviewed the qualifications of candidates seeking approval to be on the ballot in the upcoming alumni trustee election. Candidate approval by the nominating subcommittee is required by the revised and controversial July 2024 bylaws. For the first time ever, a candidate was disapproved — incumbent Barry Fenchak.

This, of course, is no surprise. Our board has censured Barry, discontinued his social privileges and planned a vote to expel him only to have Centre County Judge Brian Marshall censure our board for obvious retaliation. Judge Brian Marshall said, “Allowing his removal would recast a shadow over the financial operations of the defendants to the detriment of every Penn State stakeholder except those at the very top of PSU’s hierarchy.” In the same court order, Marshall said, “The Court has been presented with credible and, in many instances uncontroverted, evidence that Plaintiff (Barry) has been the subject to ongoing incidents of retaliation by Defendants ...”

The board’s hubris in denying a ballot position for incumbent Fenchak wreaks of further retaliation. Is our board so clueless and arrogant to ignore the gist of the judge’s ruling? What is so disheartening is that no one has worked harder than Barry to address our obvious budget woes ($100 million budget deficits, potential campus closures) and declining prestige (ranked last in Big 10 and 184/206 in U.S. News Best Value Universities.) Fenchak has consistently sought data and asked questions about financial and academic matters: a true “disruptor” challenging the status quo. Given our university’s woes, we need more Barrys, not fewer."

Read more at: https://centredaily.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article301169094.html#storylink=cpy
Awareness of your quest for the truth, and a better Penn State, is spreading. The question is, "Will it matter?". Regardless of the long term results, I believe it already has.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
2,529
1,705
113
Note that when Soyster unsuccessfully ran for a seat on the BoT in 2014, he did so by focusing on PSU's failing financial and academic/reputational health, and his platform was to implement the RCM budgetary model - as had been done at Northeastern, when he was a Dean of a college there - to bring us back to our former glory, and beyond! Mind you, Northeastern, in fact, only adopted a hybrid model, not full RCM (and, while it has a huge BoT, there are no dedicated alumni slots) ... regardless, PSU actually fully implemented RCM since then. I guess that's why everyone here is commenting how PSU is on the right track, huh? Except Soyster has recently written other letters championing Barry and decrying PSU's comparative lack of financial and academic success. Almost like his substantiative ideas didn't work ... or, in the alternative ... it was never really about substantive ideas in the first place ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: FHSPSU67

ChandlerPearce58

Active member
Jun 24, 2024
249
299
63
It is a shame that supposedly adults that have passion for the success of PSU can lose themselves thru indoctrination from those who are only interested in their personal prestige, perks, and perceived power.
 

Nittering Nabob

Well-known member
Sep 17, 2024
1,158
976
113
Note that when Soyster unsuccessfully ran for a seat on the BoT in 2014, he did so by focusing on PSU's failing financial and academic/reputational health, and his platform was to implement the RCM budgetary model - as had been done at Northeastern, when he was a Dean of a college there - to bring us back to our former glory, and beyond! Mind you, Northeastern, in fact, only adopted a hybrid model, not full RCM (and, while it has a huge BoT, there are no dedicated alumni slots) ... regardless, PSU actually fully implemented RCM since then. I guess that's why everyone here is commenting how PSU is on the right track, huh? Except Soyster has recently written other letters championing Barry and decrying PSU's comparative lack of financial and academic success. Almost like his substantiative ideas didn't work ... or, in the alternative ... it was never really about substantive ideas in the first place ...
There’s nothing worse than a failed ex-Penn Stater using arcane acronyms (RCM?🤷🏼‍♂️ I had to use Mr. Google to familiarize myself with that unique abbreviation) to make themself seem relevant. 🙄

Who do you hate more? Barry or Anthony?
 
Last edited:

PSU Mike

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,631
4,302
113
There’s nothing worse than a failed ex-Penn Stater using arcane acronyms (RCM?🤷🏼‍♂️ I had to use Mr. Google to familiarize myself with that unique abbreviation) to make themselves seem relevant. 🙄

Who do you hate more? Barry or Anthony?
Initialism. If you’re going to act smart, be smart.
 

ChandlerPearce58

Active member
Jun 24, 2024
249
299
63
There’s nothing worse than a failed ex-Penn Stater using arcane acronyms (RCM?🤷🏼‍♂️ I had to use Mr. Google to familiarize myself with that unique abbreviation) to make themselves seem relevant. 🙄

Who do you hate more? Barry or Anthony?
RCM?.......I thought it was RPM!
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
2,529
1,705
113
There’s nothing worse than a failed ex-Penn Stater using arcane acronyms (RCM?🤷🏼‍♂️ I had to use Mr. Google to familiarize myself with that unique abbreviation) to make themself seem relevant. 🙄

Who do you hate more? Barry or Anthony?

You're angry at me because you were ignorant to the basics of organizational structure and budgeting? Or you're mad at me because you had to learn?

You keep swinging and missing ... maybe try to bunt before the coach only allows you to play "Left Out."