Nebraska fires Scott Frost after embarrassing home loss to Georgia Southern
Nebraska has fired Frost as head coach just three games into his fifth season on the job.
Insult to injury....Ga Southern is coached by Clay Helton (ex-architect of USC's demise). The buyout reasoning is a telling aspect. Nebraska was willing to pay double to cut him loose now rather than 4 weeks from now. $7.5 to $15 million.They want us to trounce them
Some patience for this year's OU team is required.OU better play better than they did yesterday or it could actually be a close game.
Nebraska paid Frost $15M when they could have “only” paid him $7.5M if they had waited until October 1st to fire him. That’s how bad they wanted him out.I expect the transfer portal exodus to get hot this week. I am sure plenty of Frost loyalists will hit the road. Frost a nice guy but not a wise coach. Now a very rich ex Coach.
No, it’s more like Trev Alberts padding his buddies pocket while he loots the university. Here’s another 7.5 million my friend……. Even Al Capone couldn’t have got away with that one :Nebraska paid Frost $15M when they could have “only” paid him $7.5M if they had waited until October 1st to fire him. That’s how bad they wanted him out.![]()
The university didn't pay for that. Boosters did. No coach at a public university is paid for with school money after about $200K per year.No, it’s more like Trev Alberts padding his buddies pocket while he loots the university. Here’s another 7.5 million my friend……. Even Al Capone couldn’t have got away with that one :
You may be right but all I know is that Frost’s buyout was renegotiated after last season to reduce the buyout down to $7.5M after October 1st. Seems for them to do that and then fire him prior to October 1st is pretty telling how bad they wanted him out.No, it’s more like Trev Alberts padding his buddies pocket while he loots the university. Here’s another 7.5 million my friend……. Even Al Capone couldn’t have got away with that one :
Scottsdale, how much do you think Nebraska will have pay the new coach? The rumor is probably true but OU is Nebraska’s last game during September. Next game is October 1st. Wow. $7.5M difference for one game more with Frost.Rumor has it that Tom Osborne rallied the donors for $15 million for immediate buyout. You can bet that Trev does not do anything without Tom's approval. The search is on.
Frost was making $4 million a year. I think his UCF track record gave him a negotiating advantage when he came to Nebraska. Just a guess but I think Nebraska has to start at about $3 mil and remain flexible to $5 mil based on their selection. They have to bait the hook. Nebraska lost its luster and not many of today's young successful coaches remember when things were good in Lincoln. Nebraska certainly does not have the financial depth of donors that OU has. If I were a top shelf coach or coordinator being courted by Nebraska the first thing I would analyze would be the ability to recruit. Nebraska used to be coast to coast. No more. Venables is getting $7 million a year and he was considered the top of the list of D1 Coordinators. Will Nebraska venture this to secure a top shelf coaching candidate?Scottsdale, how much do you think Nebraska will have pay the new coach? The rumor is probably true but OU is Nebraska’s last game during September. Next game is October 1st. Wow. $7.5M difference for one game more with Frost.
They're going to end up with someone like ULL's Billy Napier who ended up at UF. No way they can make a splash hire and its all an exercise in futility anyway. The fork has been buried in that proud program for some time now - no rivalry to sell (Iowa?) and no recruiting base.Will Nebraska venture this to secure a top shelf coaching candidate?
I was really hoping NU would re-emerge and challenge Ohio St in the B10. However like someone said above I think NU wil never be the NU we grew up with. That is really sad for CFB and the Husker fans.They're going to end up with someone like ULL's Billy Napier who ended up at UF. No way they can make a splash hire and its all an exercise in futility anyway. The fork has been buried in that proud program for some time now - no rivalry to sell (Iowa?) and no recruiting base.
Umph.I was really hoping NU would re-emerge and challenge Ohio St in the B10. However like someone said above I think NU wil never be the NU we grew up with. That is really sad for CFB and the Husker fans.
I agree. Most likely Nebraska’s great teams are behind them. With the right coach they may have seasons that cause other B10 teams heartburn but I doubt there will be many. The “right” guy is foremost at the present time. It will be interesting to see who takes the job.I was really hoping NU would re-emerge and challenge Ohio St in the B10. However like someone said above I think NU wil never be the NU we grew up with. That is really sad for CFB and the Husker fans.
Neb is is the level of Tulane my man. Same as yer president.I agree. Most likely Nebraska’s great teams are behind them. With the right coach they may have seasons that cause other B10 teams heartburn but I doubt there will be many. The “right” guy is foremost at the present time. It will be interesting to see who takes the job.
I think that’s what we’re saying, Woody. Question is can they get better with a new coach. Or should I say the right coach.Neb is is the level of Tulane my man. Same as yer president.![]()
Not in the near future unfortunately. If ever. Dang shame.I think that’s what we’re saying, Woody. Question is can they get better with a new coach. Or should I say the right coach.
I understand your pov, but I also understand Tom's. There is no doubt they were hurt by leaving. But the fact is that the Texas Longhorns caused this, in so many ways. If it was just Nebish, then I'd totally agree with you. But the president at UT convinced the non-athletic minded presidents in the conference to do things that were better for UT, but not for the other 11 teams in the conference.Tom Osborne allowed his emotions to make his decisions and his decision to jump to the Big 10 was wrong. He took Nebraska out of the Big 12 and that's is where their identity permanently resided. They were almost guaranteed the poll position in the north division each year. They entered a Big 10 environment that no one really knew them or cared to know them. Ohio State and Michigan historically own the Big 10 and Nebraska has discovered there is no room for them. Penn State is the only school that has a chance to gain some ground in the conference. Where the Nebraska fans want to admit it or not, their fame and fortune hinged on their match ups with OU and Colorado. One those games dropped they lost serious recognition. There is virtually no where for Nebraska to go now. A coach considering Nebraska better put some hard thoughts and numbers on paper before accepting this job. How many 4 and 5 star players in Big 10 country? Where are they going? What would attract them to Lincoln?
Plaino, this is one of your best posts.I understand your pov, but I also understand Tom's. There is no doubt they were hurt by leaving. But the fact is that the Texas Longhorns caused this, in so many ways. If it was just Nebish, then I'd totally agree with you. But the president at UT convinced the non-athletic minded presidents in the conference to do things that were better for UT, but not for the other 11 teams in the conference.
It cost the conference four quality programs. Colorado? A bunch of us would say good riddance. But CU won a natty in the 90's and became a high quality program under McCartney. And were great under Barnett, including a great win over Texas is the 2001 CCG. They became Nebraska's equal after that.
Nebraska was a great program until Texas convinced the Big XII to limit the number of partial qualifiers in the conference, creating to them and other Big XII schools, higher restrictions than any other conference in the country. Texas did it, because it creates an advantage when you have the largest instate football recruiting base in America. They ran off A&M and they ran off Mizzou. Those were four quality athletic programs. And Texas did it because it was better for them, but not the other 11.
In football, from the creation of the Big XII in 1996, for a decade, the Big XII was as good as ANY conference in the country. But Texas didn't care about that. They only cared about themselves. Now, more great rivalries have been destroyed. We've been playing OSU for more than a century. That's going away. It sucks. And being aligned with Texas in this move to the SEC sucks.
For OU fans, having almost no conference road games in the former easy driving distance goes away. We are not in the southeastern part of the country. The culture of people in the Big XII fits us. The culture of the SEC does not. You may love the move to the SEC. I believe that ten years from now, we'll regret this. But the chances I'll be around by then is likely less the 50-50. We'll see.
But Texas ran off too many teams for the Big XII to stay great. Teams we've played for eight or nine or ten decades or more, who have our middle of the country outlook on life, will not be part of our future. At 71, it makes me sad. UT caused all of this. And we joined up with the worst possible dance partner.
I agree with everything you stated but that does not absolve or justify Osborne's and the three others decisions. I agree that Texas made it difficult for those four teams and I agree that most of the blame rest at the UT doorstep. You seem to frame it as if there was not possible way of standing up to Texas which is simply not true. The schools that remained suffered no set back. I think it an extremely weak argument to say that today's failure are the fault of UT's historical positions. These four teams made hasty decisions that cost their programs. That is where the fault lies. In my opinion, none of these four teams are better off today. Colorado and Nebraska are far worse off and to say its Texas fault is a cop out. Again, just my opinion, but I think the decisions to leave based on the actions of one is short sighted and poorly thought out. Arguably, teams that stayed and stood up to Texas are better off today and Texas is suffering the backwash of their position. "Discretion is the better part of valor". Sometimes it is better to hold your position to determine the next move. Turn tail and running before assessment proved to be costly.I understand your pov, but I also understand Tom's. There is no doubt they were hurt by leaving. But the fact is that the Texas Longhorns caused this, in so many ways. If it was just Nebish, then I'd totally agree with you. But the president at UT convinced the non-athletic minded presidents in the conference to do things that were better for UT, but not for the other 11 teams in the conference.
It cost the conference four quality programs. Colorado? A bunch of us would say good riddance. But CU won a natty in the 90's and became a high quality program under McCartney. And were great under Barnett, including a great win over Texas is the 2001 CCG. They became Nebraska's equal after that.
Nebraska was a great program until Texas convinced the Big XII to limit the number of partial qualifiers in the conference, creating to them and other Big XII schools, higher restrictions than any other conference in the country. Texas did it, because it creates an advantage when you have the largest instate football recruiting base in America. They ran off A&M and they ran off Mizzou. Those were four quality athletic programs. And Texas did it because it was better for them, but not the other 11.
In football, from the creation of the Big XII in 1996, for a decade, the Big XII was as good as ANY conference in the country. But Texas didn't care about that. They only cared about themselves. Now, more great rivalries have been destroyed. We've been playing OSU for more than a century. That's going away. It sucks. And being aligned with Texas in this move to the SEC sucks.
For OU fans, having almost no conference road games in the former easy driving distance goes away. We are not in the southeastern part of the country. The culture of people in the Big XII fits us. The culture of the SEC does not. You may love the move to the SEC. I believe that ten years from now, we'll regret this. But the chances I'll be around by then is likely less the 50-50. We'll see.
But Texas ran off too many teams for the Big XII to stay great. Teams we've played for eight or nine or ten decades or more, who have our middle of the country outlook on life, will not be part of our future. At 71, it makes me sad. UT caused all of this. And we joined up with the worst possible dance partner.