Huh? Isn't it well known he was hired to investigate Trump?I didnt see the date on the story but he is admitting now he was hired in 2015 to investigate Trump. If that story is legit.
I dont know if the story is old info or not. I read about 1 paragraph and got a call.Huh? Isn't it well known he was hired to investigate Trump?
I guess I'm just confused. I never thought there was any doubt he was paid to investigate Trump. Maybe it is just an old story.I dont know if the story is old info or not. I read about 1 paragraph and got a call.
He has a book coming out. So it is old news being branded to sell.I guess I'm just confused. I never thought there was any doubt he was paid to investigate Trump. Maybe it is just an old story.
He was but that had nothing to do with the Steele dossier. The Steele dossier was all Hillary.He was hired during the Republican primaries, wasn’t he? That would be 2015
A dossier is a collection of information gathered on a specific person or organization. I’m sure whatever information was gathered from initial investigations by GPS was included in the Steele DossierHe was but that had nothing to do with the Steele dossier. The Steele dossier was all Hillary.
The timeline mentioned in his upcoming book isnt clear about which dates and who.
FFS, would you give it up already?A dossier is a collection of information gathered on a specific person or organization. I’m sure whatever information was gathered from initial investigations by GPS was included in the Steele Dossier
Except the Steele dossier wasnt what they did in 2015. Just stop trying to connect this. You are wrongA dossier is a collection of information gathered on a specific person or organization. I’m sure whatever information was gathered from initial investigations by GPS was included in the Steele Dossier
1) I didn’t condemn him for the Ukraine callFFS, would you give it up already?
All of the foreign **** you all are grousing about Trump doing, Hillary paid for as well. The GOP stuff was contained to domestic. This isn’t news or debatable at this point. You voted for what you’re condemning.
How do you know what the GOP “stuff” was limited to?FFS, would you give it up already?
All of the foreign **** you all are grousing about Trump doing, Hillary paid for as well. The GOP stuff was contained to domestic. This isn’t news or debatable at this point. You voted for what you’re condemning.
Congressional testimonyHow do you know what the GOP “stuff” was limited to?
Can you link me to the evidence that states the GOP 2015 contracting of GPS had no Steele Dossier information within it, and had no attempts to dig into Russian connections in the Trump campaign.Except the Steele dossier wasnt what they did in 2015. Just stop trying to connect this. You are wrong
I don’t remember. So many people gave testimony but it was clarified in their testimony.From Simpson?
Not with Simpson. He never stated it was domestic only research, when questioned by Gowdy. He even went as far as to say that GPS doesn’t allow clinents to specify what type of research they do.I don’t remember. So many people gave testimony but it was clarified in their testimony.
Read the Simpson testimony. He saud the information he got for the GOP was domestic. The Steele dossier was all foreign.Can you link me to the evidence that states the GOP 2015 contracting of GPS had no Steele Dossier information within it, and had no attempts to dig into Russian connections in the Trump campaign.
I honestly haven’t seen anything on the GOP information compiled, and am using common sense in my assumption that when seeking dirt on Trump - you go where it’s fvcking dirty.
Had to do with when Steele was retained. Simpson may have done some foreign digging, but Steel wasn’t retained until Clinton took over the payments.Not with Simpson. He never stated it was domestic only research, when questioned by Gowdy. He even went as far as to say that GPS doesn’t allow clinents to specify what type of research they do.
So I surely do not know where you’re getting this nugget, which would be critical to my understanding of a separation between the two investigations.
I read, and look for truth. What do you do?BoomFizzle " If only someone would convince me of Trump's innocence I would believe.....but since my mind is made up I will continue to drink the blue Kkkool-ade".........
Can you link me to the evidence that states the GOP 2015 contracting of GPS had no Steele Dossier information within it, and had no attempts to dig into Russian connections in the Trump campaign.
I honestly haven’t seen anything on the GOP information compiled, and am using common sense in my assumption that when seeking dirt on Trump - you go where it’s fvcking dirty.
I read Simpson stating differentlyhttps://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/d...ript-of-glenn-simpsons-senate-testimony/2700/
He states, among other things:
- One client's work doesn't bleed into another's. Each has a unique point of view, and different objective
- The initial work on Trump started in September/October 2015 (so not new news)
- Initial engagement ended in spring of 2016
- Most of the work for the initial client involved bankruptcies, taxes, and involvement with Russian mafia on US soil.
- Steele was contracted in May or June of 2016 for the second client.
https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180118/106796/HMTG-115-IG00-20180118-SD002.pdfWhich part?