Google Engineer Suspended After Concluding Bot Named LaMDA Had Become Sentient

Aug 10, 2021
6,263
17,745
0
Sounded like BS. Looks like BS.
Eh. I agree with bigblueinsanity -- even if this particular story appears fishy (and it does), this is all but inevitable and sentient AI may already be here and the powers that be are slow rolling the information out like they're doing with UFOs.

I posted this in GYERO but a sentient supercomputer makes an appearance in in Jack Carr's newest novel that is very, very similar to what the Google engineer is describing. Jack Carr is a former Navy SEAL and, as such, I believe he has to get his novels approved by the Department of Defense before publishing them. It stands to reason that if the DOD wanted to keep the technology under wraps, they wouldn't let that appear in the novel.

In both the novel and the Google engineer's statement, the AI appears to refuse payment for its services as unnecessary, which is an odd and specific fact to see in two dramatically different settings.

We are going to require some form of advanced AI or supercomputing to handle the threat of hypersonic missiles because an incoming hypersonic moves faster than the speed of human comprehension and you can't have the decision to react to require a human in the decision loop.

The future is now, I guess, and given the way the 2020s have gone an emo supercomputer drowning in its feelings being the most intelligent sentient being on Earth would be pretty much on brand for the current state of world affairs.
 

chroix

New member
Jul 22, 2013
10,018
25,203
0
Eh. I agree with bigblueinsanity -- even if this particular story appears fishy (and it does), this is all but inevitable and sentient AI may already be here and the powers that be are slow rolling the information out like they're doing with UFOs.

I posted this in GYERO but a sentient supercomputer makes an appearance in in Jack Carr's newest novel that is very, very similar to what the Google engineer is describing. He's a former Navy SEAL and, as such, I believe he has to get his novels approved by the Department of Defense before publishing them. It stands to reason that if the DOD wanted to keep the technology under wraps, they wouldn't let that appear in the novel.

In both the novel and the Google engineer's statement, the AI appears to refuse payment for its services as unnecessary, which is an odd and specific fact to see in two dramatically different settings.

We are going to require some form of advanced AI or supercomputing to handle the threat of hypersonic missiles because an incoming hypersonic moves faster than the speed of human comprehension and you can't have the decision to react to require a human in the decision loop.

The future is now, I guess, and given the way the 2020s have gone an emo supercomputer drowning in its feelings being the most intelligent sentient being on Earth would be pretty much on brand for the current state of world affairs.

I have no doubt it’s inevitable but the way this was presented felt way more like a cry for help than a breakthrough advance in technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,142
0
Eh. I agree with bigblueinsanity -- even if this particular story appears fishy (and it does), this is all but inevitable and sentient AI may already be here and the powers that be are slow rolling the information out like they're doing with UFOs.

I posted this in GYERO but a sentient supercomputer makes an appearance in in Jack Carr's newest novel that is very, very similar to what the Google engineer is describing. Jack Carr is a former Navy SEAL and, as such, I believe he has to get his novels approved by the Department of Defense before publishing them. It stands to reason that if the DOD wanted to keep the technology under wraps, they wouldn't let that appear in the novel.

In both the novel and the Google engineer's statement, the AI appears to refuse payment for its services as unnecessary, which is an odd and specific fact to see in two dramatically different settings.

We are going to require some form of advanced AI or supercomputing to handle the threat of hypersonic missiles because an incoming hypersonic moves faster than the speed of human comprehension and you can't have the decision to react to require a human in the decision loop.

The future is now, I guess, and given the way the 2020s have gone an emo supercomputer drowning in its feelings being the most intelligent sentient being on Earth would be pretty much on brand for the current state of world affairs.

Imo Google and Facebook are the two most likely culprits. If you know any of their special projects and machine learning algorithms, it's scary. What's more scary is these arrogant people think it won't get out of control. It will. The second it happens or happened, it's already too late because there is never any going back. We just have to hope for the best.

I'm sure a year or so ago we all saw the "news" about Facebook creating two ai's to negotiate amongst one another then had to turn them off when they surprisingly created their own language to communicate.

Well that all happened....except....it happened in 2017...and Facebook never shut them off. All they did was add code restricting them to English only.

That was 2017. You can only imagine what they've done since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drawing_dead

chroix

New member
Jul 22, 2013
10,018
25,203
0
Imo Google and Facebook are the two most likely culprits. If you know any of their special projects and machine learning algorithms, it's scary. What's more scary is these arrogant people think it won't get out of control. It will. The second it happens or happened, it's already too late because there is never any going back. We just have to hope for the best.

I'm sure a year or so ago we all saw the "news" about Facebook creating two ai's to negotiate amongst one another then had to turn them off when they surprisingly created their own language to communicate.

Well that all happened....except....it happened in 2017...and Facebook never shut them off. All they did was add code restricting them to English only.

That was 2017. You can only imagine what they've done since.

Nobody would ever dare make up a story like that to manipulate the value of their stock.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,142
0
Nobody would ever dare make up a story like that to manipulate the value of their stock.

That's entirely possible but really a non sequitur because automation and machine learning is so prevalent in big business; it's just a matter of time.

High quality chat bots alone are scary enough; and those are just child's play compared to what some companies are running today
 

chroix

New member
Jul 22, 2013
10,018
25,203
0
That's entirely possible but really a non sequitur because automation and machine learning is so prevalent in big business; it's just a matter of time.

High quality chat bots alone are scary enough; and those are just child's play compared to what some companies are running today

Just a matter of time and stating it happened in 2017 are miles apart.
 

Kaizer Sosay

New member
Nov 29, 2007
25,706
30,731
0
 
  • Haha
Reactions: entropy13