Hokies up on UNC 14-0 with 3 min left in first half.

Feb 15, 2005
7,083
60
0
Whoever ranked UNC #10 shows you they have no idea what they are doing.
I think they did. UNC somewhat had a pulse last season and their coach has at least had some success in the past. Hence they were annoited a high ranking because they were the chosen to try and make it seem like Clemson actually has some competition on the other side of the conference. So it only seems that way if you think the ranking was created based upon how good the team was rather than trying to set up narratives to generate interest in what is likely to be another "Clemson and rest" situation in the ACC.
 

WVUALLEN

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
64,311
229
63
I think they did. UNC somewhat had a pulse last season and their coach has at least had some success in the past. Hence they were annoited a high ranking because they were the chosen to try and make it seem like Clemson actually has some competition on the other side of the conference. So it only seems that way if you think the ranking was created based upon how good the team was rather than trying to set up narratives to generate interest in what is likely to be another "Clemson and rest" situation in the ACC.
Basically it's based upon last years success. UNC lost a lot of moving parts on their offense. But it's only 1st half.

VT qb looks pretty good. Hoping it's because UNC has a poor defense.