How in any universe was Penn State...

ConcealedCarry

Sophomore
Nov 7, 2015
74
162
33
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.
 
Oct 12, 2021
360
955
93
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.
The problem with smoke and mirrors, is that eventually you run out of smoke and mirrors.
 

hapval8286

Junior
Jan 4, 2013
137
214
43
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.
I was shocked to see them ranked that high to start the season. They had no players returning that had a proven track record of being an elite superstar player that could help them win a big game. That's a big reason why PSU lost the biggest three games of 2024, not enough talent. The only two superstars from that team, Carter and Warren, went pro. I felt a ranking of about #8 would have been fair to start the season since we were returning so many seniors who were supposed to get better from junior to senior year (which didn't happen obviously). After the first three games of this year, we probably should have dropped to #10 or #11 if the pollsters were being honest about the on-field performance against very bad teams. After the loss to Oregon, that would have put us about #15 going into UCLA. It makes the upset more believable, I guess.
 

Blair10

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2002
1,773
3,669
113
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.

Weak is the appropriate word to describe the Penn State offensive line. As a group, the OL has been physically abused by opposing defensive lines. Physicality and toughness are missing for Penn State’s OL.
 

pennstatefan111

Redshirt
Jan 4, 2005
15
20
3
The need re-instill the trademark of football is higher than ever. Bring back a hard-nosed team!

Weak is the appropriate word to describe the Penn State offensive line. As a group, the OL has been physically abused by opposing defensive lines. Physicality and toughness are missing for Penn State’s OL.
I dont disagree, but I'd love to know how did this OL suddenly get weak within 8 months (different schemes, size, injuries we dont know about)? At any rate, its been a failure since the first game and we all recognized it but brushed it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RochLion

CDLionFL

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2021
1,713
2,602
113
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.
Can ask the same about Texas and Arch as preseason Heisman frontrunner. Media still feels the need to inject themselves into a game that doesn’t need much extra hype.
 
  • Like
Reactions: razpsu

BUFFALO LION

All-Conference
Oct 4, 2001
989
1,485
93
The need re-instill the trademark of football is higher than ever. Bring back a hard-nosed team!
I dont disagree, but I'd love to know how did this OL suddenly get weak within 8 months (different schemes, size, injuries we dont know about)? At any rate, its been a failure since the first game and we all recognized it but brushed it off.

The difference between now and when Joe was here is money. Now that we are paying these kids, the whole paradigm has changed.

In years past, these kids played for their schools, their family, their friends, their degrees, and their teammates. Everybody was in the same boat working for the same goal with the same opportunity to excel. Now that they’re playing for the almighty buck, you can have HUGE team chemistry problems in more ways than I have time to explain here. That team COMPLETELY checked out on Saturday. Especially the defense. The bad chemistry was off the charts.

Do these mercenaries even go to class anymore and mingle with the rest of the student body like they used to? How many actually get a degree anymore? How is their pay structure set up? Is the money we pay them guaranteed? If so, once we pay them, why do they give a crap? To an 18 or 20 year old kid, they think $100,000 will set them up for life. That makes them soft and more willing to make “business decisions”.

If these kids start to sit out the season with “long term UNDISCLOSED injuries”, do we still have to pay them? Do we still have to pay them if they take a requested red shirt year, knowing they will be portaling in a couple of months? If so, a lot of 18 or 20 year old kids will just either take their money and run, or only just go through the motions.

This team will only win if they can win easy. They slept walked through the first three games and won easy. They played their a$$es off against Oregon and lost. That obviously took all the fight out of this team and completely demoralized them. Anyone that doesn’t take Northwestern and 22 points on Saturday is brain dead nuts.
 

Midnighter

Heisman
Jan 22, 2021
11,433
18,848
113
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.

PSU as a national favorite makes sense IMO - almost entire offense returning from a top four finish last year and a favorable schedule again this year. Plus the addition of the 'top' DC in the country; the season was supposed to hinge on Oregon and OSU and now we're looking at barely making a bowl game.

Manning as a Heisman frontrunner is on his name alone, which should tell you all you need to know about college football punditry. He literally played in the Little Sisters of the Poor private school league where he was literally the biggest and fastest person on any team. He played well in mop up time last year and that is it on the tape for young Arch; folks forget his dad was the Manning who didn't make the NFL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrtLng Lion

DaytonRickster

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,376
2,819
113
I dont disagree, but I'd love to know how did this OL suddenly get weak within 8 months (different schemes, size, injuries we dont know about)? At any rate, its been a failure since the first game and we all recognized it but brushed it off.
I don't think we brushed it off. It was evident from game one.
I think it goes to the absence of Frank Leonard who assisted with OL coaching last year. Word is he kicked OL players in the butt and was tough with his critiques of their play and worked on correctoons.
 

Fred8811

Sophomore
Aug 27, 2006
234
133
43
I watched a lot of the OL replays, and I know zero about OL, but they looked dead, weak, sloppy when compared to previous years.
 

SleepyLion

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2022
2,316
3,300
113
I've already played PSU -21.5.
Han Solo Optimism GIF by Star Wars
 

Nits74

All-Conference
May 14, 2010
1,201
1,919
113
The difference between now and when Joe was here is money. Now that we are paying these kids, the whole paradigm has changed.

In years past, these kids played for their schools, their family, their friends, their degrees, and their teammates. Everybody was in the same boat working for the same goal with the same opportunity to excel. Now that they’re playing for the almighty buck, you can have HUGE team chemistry problems in more ways than I have time to explain here. That team COMPLETELY checked out on Saturday. Especially the defense. The bad chemistry was off the charts.

Do these mercenaries even go to class anymore and mingle with the rest of the student body like they used to? How many actually get a degree anymore? How is their pay structure set up? Is the money we pay them guaranteed? If so, once we pay them, why do they give a crap? To an 18 or 20 year old kid, they think $100,000 will set them up for life. That makes them soft and more willing to make “business decisions”.

If these kids start to sit out the season with “long term UNDISCLOSED injuries”, do we still have to pay them? Do we still have to pay them if they take a requested red shirt year, knowing they will be portaling in a couple of months? If so, a lot of 18 or 20 year old kids will just either take their money and run, or only just go through the motions.

This team will only win if they can win easy. They slept walked through the first three games and won easy. They played their a$$es off against Oregon and lost. That obviously took all the fight out of this team and completely demoralized them. Anyone that doesn’t take Northwestern and 22 points on Saturday is brain dead nuts.
The difference between now and when Joe was here is money. Now that we are paying these kids, the whole paradigm has changed.

In years past, these kids played for their schools, their family, their friends, their degrees, and their teammates. Everybody was in the same boat working for the same goal with the same opportunity to excel. Now that they’re playing for the almighty buck, you can have HUGE team chemistry problems in more ways than I have time to explain here. That team COMPLETELY checked out on Saturday. Especially the defense. The bad chemistry was off the charts.

Do these mercenaries even go to class anymore and mingle with the rest of the student body like they used to? How many actually get a degree anymore? How is their pay structure set up? Is the money we pay them guaranteed? If so, once we pay them, why do they give a crap? To an 18 or 20 year old kid, they think $100,000 will set them up for life. That makes them soft and more willing to make “business decisions”.

If these kids start to sit out the season with “long term UNDISCLOSED injuries”, do we still have to pay them? Do we still have to pay them if they take a requested red shirt year, knowing they will be portaling in a couple of months? If so, a lot of 18 or 20 year old kids will just either take their money and run, or only just go through the motions.

This team will only win if they can win easy. They slept walked through the first three games and won easy. They played their a$$es off against Oregon and lost. That obviously took all the fight out of this team and completely demoralized them. Anyone that doesn’t take Northwestern and 22 points on Saturday is brain dead nuts.
You nailed it, Buffalo. I'd been thinking these very things over the last few of days. This isn't near the college football most of us once knew. These guys don't give a damn, and there is no longer any pride within them for the university they represent. Now to be fair, I lost much of my own pride due to the lack of backbone on the part of those running the school back in 2011. Good to see one of your posts again. As I remember they were always well thought out.
 
Sep 10, 2013
16,880
12,108
113
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.
I completely bought into the ranking. I predicted they’d make it to the final four. This is why I don’t bet my own money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tgar

Erial_Lion

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
3,483
4,252
113
I was also thinking this may be a good time to bet PSU ( I have not this season). Buy the dip. Hoping the number goes down.
I laid the points against Oregon, but that's been it so far. I won't add anything if it hits 21, but would definitely add to it if any 20.5's pop.

Also watching closely to see where UCLA goes from here. Was Saturday just a dead cat bounce, or will they find something with the move away from Foster (and/or was he really just that bad).
 

thoss

Sophomore
Aug 7, 2025
46
101
33
ranked # 2 at the beginning of the season? Even after three miserable performances against cupcakes , PSU remained in the top three. I saw it, you all saw it. A slow weak LUMBERING offensive line that averages roughly 6'5 320 lbs exhibits no power. They simply do not know how to RUN BLOCK and that has been one of the hallmarks and failures of Franklin's tenure. He does not commit to POWER football.

The people who do the rankings really don't know the teams very well. People who really watch PSU football closely (I think John Sauber is one) I think identified DT, DE and linebacker as potential depth problems. But I don't think anyone would have foreseen that OL would be such a mess. It just didn't compute that PSU couldn't run the ball the first three weeks of the season but now it's clear PSU just doesn't have the ability to run the ball. And they certainly don't throw the ball well enough to make up for not running the ball.

Having all the seniors coming back may end up being a liability now. They have nothing to play for. They could lose a whole lot of games. At least a younger team could play hard, have fun and look forward to next year. I don't think anybody on this team is having fun right now.
 

op2

All-Conference
Mar 16, 2014
11,527
1,045
103
No team should be allowed to be ranked until they've played at least one game. So no preseason rankings. Then if there are only two games in Week 0 rankings, the rankings after that week will have only four team in it.

Okay, it'll never happen, but I like the idea.
 
Sep 10, 2013
16,880
12,108
113
No team should be allowed to be ranked until they've played at least one game. So no preseason rankings. Then if there are only two games in Week 0 rankings, the rankings after that week will have only four team in it.

Okay, it'll never happen, but I like the idea.
I say start ranking after week 5. 3 sister Mary poors then 2 medium boys. Wasn’t our D ranked 6th after our d 1aa start?
 

Grant Green

All-Conference
Jan 21, 2004
3,425
4,724
113
I laid the points against Oregon, but that's been it so far. I won't add anything if it hits 21, but would definitely add to it if any 20.5's pop.

Also watching closely to see where UCLA goes from here. Was Saturday just a dead cat bounce, or will they find something with the move away from Foster (and/or was he really just that bad).
The dead cat bounce has been good so far this season - VT and OkSt both covered the week after. UCLA didn't win the week after, but 2 weeks after firing Foster.
I have a feeling that UCLA was too undervalued and their power rating may take a bit to catch up. Also, I've not seen Nico run like he did on Saturday before. Don't know where that came from but it was likely the difference in the game (not necessarily the cover). If that continues, they can definitely get some more covers.

Not sure there are enough public bettors to get this PSU line below 21 considering the opponent.
 

Bwifan

All-Conference
Oct 12, 2021
2,557
4,487
113
I laid the points against Oregon, but that's been it so far. I won't add anything if it hits 21, but would definitely add to it if any 20.5's pop.

Also watching closely to see where UCLA goes from here. Was Saturday just a dead cat bounce, or will they find something with the move away from Foster (and/or was he really just that bad).
I think its a mix with UCLA.... Foster was bad, new coaches are better and also the players wanted to really show out for the PSU game. Once they get a few games on film it will become much tougher when teams see what you like to do and figure out ways to defend it... i.e. put a spy on their qb.
 

Headlock

Senior
Dec 28, 2023
409
746
93
No team should be allowed to be ranked until they've played at least one game. So no preseason rankings. Then if there are only two games in Week 0 rankings, the rankings after that week will have only four team in it.

Okay, it'll never happen, but I like the idea.
The very fans who thirst for pre-season comparisons and rankings are among the first to point out how unreliable the rankings are two weeks after season starts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SleepyLion
Jun 26, 2001
12
49
13
Unfortunately...we will end the year likely where we should based on last four years' of recruiting....ranked like 20, 7, 13, 15 based on composites. Ohio State in comparison has been in top 5 all of those years. At some point, it is hard to overcome superior talent. I

t can be done at times like UCLA just did to us, but hard to do consistently (Us beating OSU or Oregon)...especially when you don't have a top coach (at least offense and head for us). We probably win the UCLA game with Rojas....but when backup is former walk-on who is slow and misses tackles , it shows the lack of depth....back to the recruiting issues.
 

PSUForever

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2007
1,040
1,103
113
I laid the points against Oregon, but that's been it so far. I won't add anything if it hits 21, but would definitely add to it if any 20.5's pop.

Also watching closely to see where UCLA goes from here. Was Saturday just a dead cat bounce, or will they find something with the move away from Foster (and/or was he really just that bad).
They will win some. Nico will be able to take over versus some of these bottom rung B10 teams now that he has a better play caller and is simply playing better. Of course other opponents will actually play defense against them.
 

PSUForever

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2007
1,040
1,103
113
The people who do the rankings really don't know the teams very well. People who really watch PSU football closely (I think John Sauber is one) I think identified DT, DE and linebacker as potential depth problems. But I don't think anyone would have foreseen that OL would be such a mess. It just didn't compute that PSU couldn't run the ball the first three weeks of the season but now it's clear PSU just doesn't have the ability to run the ball. And they certainly don't throw the ball well enough to make up for not running the ball.

Having all the seniors coming back may end up being a liability now. They have nothing to play for. They could lose a whole lot of games. At least a younger team could play hard, have fun and look forward to next year. I don't think anybody on this team is having fun right now.
Yes it will be interesting to see if Franklin can rally the team or are they checked out at this time. He clearly had no idea what was wrong from his press conference answers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacNit

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,815
2,194
113
You nailed it, Buffalo. I'd been thinking these very things over the last few of days. This isn't near the college football most of us once knew. These guys don't give a damn, and there is no longer any pride within them for the university they represent. Now to be fair, I lost much of my own pride due to the lack of backbone on the part of those running the school back in 2011. Good to see one of your posts again. As I remember they were always well thought out.
I'm surprised there isn't some "animosity"over the amount of money some players are getting vis a vis others. I have no basis, but these are young men, first time making money and I'd be surprised there isn' t some questioning
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
2,815
2,194
113
The people who do the rankings really don't know the teams very well. People who really watch PSU football closely (I think John Sauber is one) I think identified DT, DE and linebacker as potential depth problems. But I don't think anyone would have foreseen that OL would be such a mess. It just didn't compute that PSU couldn't run the ball the first three weeks of the season but now it's clear PSU just doesn't have the ability to run the ball. And they certainly don't throw the ball well enough to make up for not running the ball.

Having all the seniors coming back may end up being a liability now. They have nothing to play for. They could lose a whole lot of games. At least a younger team could play hard, have fun and look forward to next year. I don't think anybody on this team is having fun right now.
Penn state still does not stretch the field. If the defense knows you're a 10 or so yard pass team they can cheat up and in effect become stronger against the run. Add in that we are a run first team, even though we don't gain any yardage, and I would think we make it easy on a defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psu00