Last week there was a discussion comparing Justin Pigott to Cody Satterwhite and both players stats from last year were compared. Here's how statistics sometimes lie:
Yesterday, Pigott lost the game for us, giving up 5 runs in 7 innings for a 6.43 ERA. If he'd been pulled when he should have been pulled with men on 1st and 3rd, no runs in and 1 out in the 7th (and assuming the releiver allowed the runner on 3rd to score, but kept the runner on 1st from scoring), Pigott would have won the game (or at worst had a no decision), giving up 3 runs in 6-1/3 innings for a 4.26 ERA. I'm guessing Pigott had a lot of similar games last year that inflated his ERA and gave him more losses than he deserved.
Yesterday, Pigott lost the game for us, giving up 5 runs in 7 innings for a 6.43 ERA. If he'd been pulled when he should have been pulled with men on 1st and 3rd, no runs in and 1 out in the 7th (and assuming the releiver allowed the runner on 3rd to score, but kept the runner on 1st from scoring), Pigott would have won the game (or at worst had a no decision), giving up 3 runs in 6-1/3 innings for a 4.26 ERA. I'm guessing Pigott had a lot of similar games last year that inflated his ERA and gave him more losses than he deserved.