Toggle sidebar

I learn so much from Clark Kellogg

A

Alan Smithee_rivals156293

Junior
Aug 13, 2002
3,221
268
0
"Offensive rebounding is all about pursuing the ball. (Pause) Well, all rebounding is about pursuing the ball but offensive rebounding even more so."
 
N

NJCat

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2016
21,326
1,500
113
Alan Smithee said:
"Offensive rebounding is all about pursuing the ball. (Pause) Well, all rebounding is about pursuing the ball but offensive rebounding even more so."
Click to expand...

And Clark picked NU to beat Wisconsin in the Semi's......
 
N

NJCat

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2016
21,326
1,500
113
pawildcat said:
Well, I though we had a decent chance at Wisconsin, given that we had beaten them before and had played well in our first two BTT games. Did you expect us to lose by 28 points? I sure didn't see that coming.
Click to expand...

No, while I did not expect a tired NU to win I didn't see a 28 point beat down.
 
J

JournCat

Junior
Aug 4, 2009
4,512
242
63
Fitzphile said:
No, while I did not expect a tired NU to win I didn't see a 28 point beat down.
Click to expand...

In retrospect, the OP of the thread questioning whether we were better off losing didn't seem that far off. That game looked like an impending disaster in about five minutes.
 
P

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,855
1,022
113
I always thought Kellogg was a little flakey. His comments are not crisp and he tends to puff up one team over another. Teams like is that are Bran new to the Tourney, like us, are targets of his sCorn. For sure, he doesn't think we will be Raisin any banners soon.
 
W

WhiskersMagee

Redshirt
Jul 22, 2016
38
15
0
phatcat said:
I always thought Kellogg was a little flakey. His comments are not crisp and he tends to puff up one team over another. Teams like is that are Bran new to the Tourney, like us, are targets of his sCorn. For sure, he doesn't think we will be Raisin any banners soon.
Click to expand...

You certainly don't sugar-coat your thoughts on this board
 
S

Sec_112

Sophomore
Jun 17, 2001
6,598
195
63
A) After three straight games with Bill Raftery pretending to pay attention to something west of Pennsylvania, I'm surprised the first post about color commentary is about another analyst.

B) In general, I really hate CBS' choices for most of it's on air "talent" throughout the tournament. Nantz ... Grant Hill ... Raftery. Blah and dead with no insight.

Are Greg Anthony, Barkley and Kenny Smith going to be in the studio again? Horrible. And I somewhat like Barkley's big mouth. But he's just collecting a check when he does college games.

To me, all of them make Kellogg look good, but that's not saying a lot.

C) On the topic of the possibility NU would have been worn down by the B10 tournament, anybody watch IU-Georgia Tech last night?

Near the end, they killed some time with predictions of each B10 team in the NCAA tournament. The color analyst (a top-of-the-line guy because it is the NIT after all) predicted Michigan would lose in the first round because of the grind of winning the conference tournament. He said something along the lines of, "I've been through a tournament championship and most people don't know how much it takes out of you. It takes an exceptional team to turn around and make a long run."

I'm just sayin'.
 
S

Styre

Junior
Oct 14, 2004
7,728
399
83
The range of opinions about broadcasters always interests me. I think Kellogg is next to worthless - everything he says is obvious and he abuses food analogies beyond the point of sanity.

I don't like Turner using the TNT NBA crew on the NCAA tourney. But then Turner is in a bind because they don't cover college basketball outside of the tournament and thus don't have anyone on staff that can do the job.

As for the "A" team, I think Nantz has really raised his game since this broadcast crew was put together and he's no longer battling with Packer or Kellogg for space. Grant Hill is solid, and I love Raft and would listen to him read the phone book.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom