We would have Stokes, Holt, and likely a All Sec Player too
Why don't we?We don’t have 22 million for 2026 recruits so no he wouldn’t. He sure as hell wouldn’t have recruited this current team though.
you guys realize Pearl did not recruit like Cal right? He brought in mostly 4 stars with the occasional 5 starWe don’t have 22 million for 2026 recruits so no he wouldn’t. He sure as hell wouldn’t have recruited this current team though.
he started heating up at the end though, shareef cooper, jabari, tahaad, almost stole jasper from usyou guys realize Pearl did not recruit like Cal right? He brought in mostly 4 stars with the occasional 5 star
I don't think it's worth speculating about Pearl at UK. Even if the Pope era ends after next season Pearl will be 67 going into his first season. Do we really want to hire a coach in his final years on the job, who already retired once...?We would have Stokes, Holt, and likely a All Sec Player too![]()
Absolutely. 67 is not very old at all these days.I would take Pearl at 67 yrs old. Give him 3 years and after that see if he is up for more.
You do realize that Bruce Pearl effectively made Tennessee and Auburn relevant in basketball?you guys realize Pearl did not recruit like Cal right? He brought in mostly 4 stars with the occasional 5 star
This shows your youth, A- that is not true at all- I will give him more credit for Auburn because they had been up and down before him, but Tennessee has a long bball history before you and I were even born and B- that has nothing to do with what I said. He's a great coach, he not an elite recruiter who brings in top class after top class, he wins on his ability not 5 star recruits, that was the point. How about read for context next time? Good effort thoughYou do realize that Bruce Pearl effectively made Tennessee and Auburn relevant in basketball?
Indiana football says helloBut would he understand the assignment since he didn't have any previous relationship with the school or state? This should be one of the biggest prerequisites when hiring a coach at UK.
Signed,
Mitch Barnhart
Before I was born they best they had ever finished was make it to the 2nd round (I'm 46). They went the majority of the 80s and 90s without even making the tournament. When he took over, they had not been to the tournament in 4 years. He made the tournament every year, with 3 Sweet 16s and 1 Elite 8. (The farthest they had ever made it in the tournament)This shows your youth, A- that is not true at all- I will give him more credit for Auburn because they had been up and down before him, but Tennessee has a long bball history before you and I were even born and B- that has nothing to do with what I said. He's a great coach, he not an elite recruiter who brings in top class after top class, he wins on his ability not 5 star recruits, that was the point. How about read for context next time? Good effort though
Exactly. If you want Pearl, its for a fun style and a guy that can coach his *** offyou guys realize Pearl did not recruit like Cal right? He brought in mostly 4 stars with the occasional 5 star
Game ,set , match.Before I was born they best they had ever finished was make it to the 2nd round (I'm 46). They went the majority of the 80s and 90s without even making the tournament. When he took over, they had not been to the tournament in 4 years. He made the tournament every year, with 3 Sweet 16s and 1 Elite 8. (The farthest they had ever made it in the tournament)
Tennessee Volunteers Men's Basketball Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Auburn was never up and down - they were always down. They had made the tournament a total of 8 times before him. He took them to the Final 4 twice. Again, the best they had ever finished, like Tennessee.
Auburn Tigers Men's Basketball Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Bruce Pearl will get what he wants if he became the coach UK donors would pitch in because it will be a 3 to 5 year sprint to a titleWe don’t have 22 million for 2026 recruits so no he wouldn’t. He sure as hell wouldn’t have recruited this current team though.
We have to be careful about what we say about Barney because this is getting to a point where he literally has full control of our athletic programs and he is allowing our basketball program to slowly deteriorate. He’s been at it for over a quarter of a century and he has succeeded he succeeded in tamping down expectations for our basketball program. The man needs to go immediately. This isn’t a laughing matter at this point it’s a lot of memes and and stuff making fun of the situation with Barney, but it’s to the point where the guy should be fired and honestly the president needs to go with them. It’s a big mess Barney has created our basketball program potentially will not survive Barney‘s tenure at. All of those expectations that have been built all of the success over the last 100 years and somehow this guy was able to come in and squat for a quarter century pulling crap like the nostalgia garbage with pope to brainwash Kentucky ends to accept his media mediocre effort. This must change this has to change or it’s over UK basketball will be over. It’s already over as we knew it, but I mean we’re looking at fighting to be a top 25 team not fighting to stay a top five team that’s Kentucky standard.Pearl was lined up, you can thank the “greatest UK AD of our lifetime” and president Cap for this mess. They wanted Pearl nowhere near the program and but a dead stop on it.
Exactly. If you want Pearl, its for a fun style and a guy that can coach his *** off
Not how it works going forward. Money either comes from the 22 million from the rev share (which basketball gets around 4 mil from) or it has to come from actual NIL deals.Bruce Pearl will get what he wants if he became the coach UK donors would pitch in because it will be a 3 to 5 year sprint to a title
Yeah and this roster isn't full of guys he would recruit. I don't care what they are ranked, Pearl can actually see talent and build rosters unlike the current coach.you guys realize Pearl did not recruit like Cal right? He brought in mostly 4 stars with the occasional 5 star
Rev share and NIL are the ways players are paid going forward. That is why over the summer players were signing before that ruling took place to lock in their money.Why don't we?
He would have been my choice. But MB will NEVER even consider him. Unless MB goes, the next guy will be average at best, and another 2-3 years of average at best after Mark is gone would be a complete disaster for the program. But for folks thinking MB will suddenly go after a HR hire if he parts ways with Pope...there is a word for doing the same things over again and expecting a different result....That sounds exactly like what everyone has always wanted from a HC at UK.
Why wouldn't they be able to earn that through NIL?Rev share and NIL are the ways players are paid going forward. That is why over the summer players were signing before that ruling took place to lock in their money.
Next coach after that 3 years would be set up better and UK would look appealing like it should to the future coach..I would take Pearl at 67 yrs old. Give him 3 years and after that see if he is up for more.
The school cannot take donations and then pay that money. It has to (or is supposed to) come from a company paying for a commercial, for example. It cannot be, come to UK and we will give you 2 million. There is no cap on NIL deals besides what sponsors are willing to pay.Why wouldn't they be able to earn that through NIL?
So, in theory, UK has partnerships with multiple entities, and UK itself is multiple entities. What stops them from funneling funds into those for "NIL" deals.The school cannot take donations and then pay that money. It has to (or is supposed to) come from a company paying for a commercial, for example. It cannot be, come to UK and we will give you 2 million. There is no cap on NIL deals besides what sponsors are willing to pay.
Tennessee is 34th all time in wins, they are not a chump program and have a deep history. You can argue all you want - there is more to a program than tournament finishes - for examples most UKs accomplishments are not recent. And I’ll say again you’re arguing a point I never made- at no point did I ever in the original or the follow up say pearl wasn’t an elite coach - so you’re debating yourself at this pointBefore I was born they best they had ever finished was make it to the 2nd round (I'm 46). They went the majority of the 80s and 90s without even making the tournament. When he took over, they had not been to the tournament in 4 years. He made the tournament every year, with 3 Sweet 16s and 1 Elite 8. (The farthest they had ever made it in the tournament)
Tennessee Volunteers Men's Basketball Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Auburn was never up and down - they were always down. They had made the tournament a total of 8 times before him. He took them to the Final 4 twice. Again, the best they had ever finished, like Tennessee.
Auburn Tigers Men's Basketball Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
I love how you guys make up your own context lol, I never said he wasn’t a great coach lolYeah and this roster isn't full of guys he would recruit. I don't care what they are ranked, Pearl can actually see talent and build rosters unlike the current coach.
Say it louder for those in the back, somehow they take my quote as a pearl diss lolExactly. If you want Pearl, its for a fun style and a guy that can coach his *** off
You can attempt to skirt the rules in many ways but MB is our AD and we clearly have 0 recruits signed. JMI is playing a role, Pope is playing a role, new rules are playing a role. Even with all that money last offseason our best HS recruits were still just Kentucky kids.So, in theory, UK has partnerships with multiple entities, and UK itself is multiple entities. What stops them from funneling funds into those for "NIL" deals.
Also, from what I am reading, collectives are still allowed but with more oversight??
But is that cheating? Are there rules that prohibited that specifically?You can attempt to skirt the rules in many ways but MB is our AD and we clearly have 0 recruits signed. JMI is playing a role, Pope is playing a role, new rules are playing a role. Even with all that money last offseason our best HS recruits were still just Kentucky kids.
You know there is a Pearl connection here?But would he understand the assignment since he didn't have any previous relationship with the school or state? This should be one of the biggest prerequisites when hiring a coach at UK.
Signed,
Mitch Barnhart
And won an NC at USI.You do realize that Bruce Pearl effectively made Tennessee and Auburn relevant in basketball?
Bruce is or was a really good college coach. He could evaluate talent, he could recruit, he could in game coach, he could have his team ready to play each game, and he is retired. Bruce Pearl is NOT coming out of retirement to come to Lexington. I am not sure why we continue to talk about getting Pearl as our coach. We have Pope and probably for atleast one more year. I have one wish for our basketball program. That wish is, we don't get another coach until Barnhart is no longer our AD. We don't want to go through another Pope hire. We need a real AD before we even think about a new coach.Pearl never coached at Kentucky. He'd get more than his fair share with our resources. Hell, maybe even a grill shaped like a mine car.