ITS MUELLER TIME

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
And he didnt indict Jr or Kushner.


KKKuntrywrong again.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
816
113
Im sure kkktard will cry watching his hero break down like that. Maybe she can release another tax record.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
Im sure kkktard will cry watching his hero break down like that. Maybe she can release another tax record.

We were promised back in March of 17 we'd all "soon" see how the collusion scheme ran. I doubt we'll see country much over the next few days.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
There is an ongoing investigation(s). I'll wait for official announcements. If you are asking my opinion at this point, I'll say yes, I believe the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. There is a hell of a lot of smoke and there is a hell of a lot of corrupt **** going on. Why else would non-partisan employees at numerous intel agencies leak all this ****. It is so bad, they feel the American public has the right to know. There is so much **** going on that you don't wrap up a thorough investigation and wrap up all loose ends in a few months.
We were promised back in March of 17 we'd all "soon" see how the collusion scheme ran. I doubt we'll see country much over the next few days.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
Another "gem" from @countryroads89

Enjoy!


You know you're headed down the primrose path when your attorney says ridiculous **** like this:

“I don't even know if that's a crime — colluding with Russians,” Giuliani said on CNN.
He added on Fox: “I have been sitting here looking in the federal code trying to find collusion as a crime. Collusion is not a crime.”

In case you forgot, Trump himself has been arguing for more than a year not that collusion wasn't a crime, but that there simply was “no collusion.”

Well ****, help me out. Is it "no 'colusion'" or collusion isn't a crime. You guys need to huddle and get your story straight.

Uh oh Jr.
Donald Trump Jr. has said under oath that his father didn't know about it. Now we have evidence he did know about it. Well ****!!!

Now Rudy is arguing there wasn't a "second meeting" when no one brought up a second meeting. Then he changes his story, well, there was "most likely not" a second meeting.

LMAO!

Rudy, you are a gem!

Uh...no, no country...YOU are! [roll]
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
@countryroads89 never stops...the gift that keeps on giving!



We'll see where the investigation goes. A hell of a lot of smoke. A hell of a lot of lying. People don't lie over legal acts. People don't ask the head of the FBI to drop an ongoing investigation if there is nothing to hide. People don't fire the head of the FBI if there is nothing to hide.

And you still think the money laundering by Manafort still has nothing to do with the trump campaign. LMAO.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
I don't see it at all anymore:smiley:

I have pages, and pages of #countywrongagain I will post selectively over the next few days. Some of these are just too good to waste as we learn more about what Mueller doesn't have, that country was 100% convinced he'd "soon" show us! Priceless stuff.

Stay tuned
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
Here's another priceless pearl of wisdom from our resident muckraker!

Mueller has Preibus' notes, which corroborate Comey's notes and statements.

I think ole RPJ was right. We have some obstruction of justice.

This is going to turn out like some cooking recipe; a dash of collusion, a sprinkling of obstruction of justice, a heaping of money laundering, etc.

Obstruction of justice?

Mueller: "no further indictments"

LOL!!!!!!![smoke] [roll]
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
Let's not forget about @moe and his omniscient brilliance:

Here:

A US law professor has said Mr Trump’s unsubstantiated claims could be a “major scandal” that “could get the current President impeached,” if proven false.

Bloomberg. “If the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false." “Given how great the executive’s power is, accusations by the President can’t be treated asymmetrically,” Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman wrote in an article for Bloomberg. “If the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false.

“Anything else would give the President the power to distort democracy by calling his opponents criminals without ever having to prove it.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-wiretapping-claim-us-justice-173132090.html
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,577
6,162
113
That poor little dork.

Country is going to get so abused over these next few days, he/she/it just may never show up back on this forum. I have TONS of countrywrong sh*t...can't wait to post it selectively as each new fact is revealed.

It's going to be like Chinese water torture....drip...drip...drip