Jack Reacher vs. John Wick

I need this

Member
Mar 7, 2007
1,744
14
26
I've never seen someone shoot so many people in the face as Wick did. But he essentially struggled with every physical encounter he had. Reacher would win.

BTW - Please stop posting. Thx.
 
Nov 14, 2001
17,294
25,503
0
 

Kaizer Sosay

New member
Nov 29, 2007
25,706
10,993
0
Originally posted by funKYcat75:
Originally posted by banachek15:
.

you spelled banacheck wrong, FYI.
So did you.



And the answer to the OP's question is...whichever one of them used pistol whipping as their main mode of intimidation. Nothing more demoralizing/humiliating than getting pistol whipped. Find the pistol whipper and you will have found your winner.
 

TankedCat

New member
Nov 8, 2006
22,792
600
0
for those of us that saw Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure, its hard to take Keanu Reeves as a badass - even with the Matrix (the first of which was an awesome movie, and the next two were so bad they made me dislike the first one)
 

banachek15

New member
Jan 27, 2015
8
0
0
Many factors to consider. Reacher is physically superior. I'd argue his gun skills are equivalent to Wick. For that reason, I think Reacher would win, no question.
 

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
Originally posted by banachek15:
Many factors to consider. Reacher is physically superior. I'd argue his gun skills are equivalent to Wick. For that reason, I think Reacher would win, no question.
It appears that way, but if you go and look at the kill count. John actually kills more people. Also you have to take into consideration that John has a "myth" about him. He is often viewed as the "boogeyman", which Jack has not been given the same respect. Another point, guns run out of bullets. John's reactionary skill when hand to hand fist fighting allows him more speed time to hurt his enemy.

I dunno, great debate tho.

This post was edited on 3/12 11:20 AM by Willy4UK