Jay Williams
- Thread starter Mulder14
- Start date
If we're keeping an open mind, wouldn't most agree that the defense and toughness has gotten better in the absence of Jaxson. Obviously this doesn't mean he was an addition by subtraction, but it's well known that Jaxson doesn't like contact and physicality in general. He's a finesse type player. But I'd like to hear the Dookie's explanation.
Please tell me he was talking about playing a less than 100% JR. Cause LBH, a 75%, rusty, JR isn’t bringing a ton.
An argument can be made we've been better on defense without JR.
Of course that just might have been because our opponents we've faced lately without him were a notch below on offense than what we typically played against.
Of course that just might have been because our opponents we've faced lately without him were a notch below on offense than what we typically played against.
Because he's a Dookie...My goodness how does he keep his job? He just said Kentucky will win because they’re better without Jackson
