FG better shot than 4th and 10. Just didnt make the kick, but still good call. Kind of the opposite as the going on 4th down early in the game.
Wrong!FG better shot than 4th and 10. Just didnt make the kick, but still good call. Kind of the opposite as the going on 4th down early in the game.
Had he made the kick, you know exactly what you need to do to win, and have some time left (assuming you get the onside kick). I can’t criticize CJF on that one.Wrong!
You are delusionalFG better shot than 4th and 10. Just didnt make the kick, but still good call. Kind of the opposite as the going on 4th down early in the game.
I see that call in the NFL all the time. since you have to get the onside kick either way, you are just comparing the odds of the FG vs the odds of hitting 4th and 10. if you get the onside kick you would be around the 50, so behind where the FG was kicked by 15-20 yds with same time and no TOs.You are delusional
FG better shot than 4th and 10. Just didnt make the kick, but still good call. Kind of the opposite as the going on 4th down early in the game.
No you are wrong and clueless. They needed 2 scores and while it was a long shot that they recover an onside kick and score a TD, going for it on 4th and 10 would have been asinine.Wrong!
I probably would have gone for it, but it was a reasonable call.FG better shot than 4th and 10. Just didnt make the kick, but still good call. Kind of the opposite as the going on 4th down early in the game.