Your welcome my friend. I agree with you, I don't think we'll ever know the real truth of it all..I have always been interested in JFK since i wrote my first "book report" at MJP elementary in the 4th grade..so far what i've read shows that Jim Garrison was on the right trail..Thanks. But does anyone really believe our govt will release a document—-any document—-it’s had 55years to doctor conceal etc. that would ever implicate or disclose its roll in the matter?
I’m primarily talking about the negligence (gross) of the investigation.
Please keep me posted. I’ve have always been fascinated by it all
Overwhelming proof that 9/11 was an inside job
Jesus man, are you serious?However, no one will ever convince me that 9/11 was exactly as they said it was. I will take it to my grave that it was an inside job.
You're hardly persuasive.Citing Gerald posners book as definitive proof is hardly persuasive IMO. Has the guy ever written anything that doesn't confirm " the official story". I've come to believe he is an extension os whatever govt story he chooses to "investigate ".
Have you seen,9/11- Loose Change yet?Jesus man, are you serious?
For one, your two statements don’t mesh. Of course it’s likely it didn’t happen as stated exactly. Sure. You could go as far as saying we shot down United 93 to keep it from getting to DC. Does not make it an “inside job”.
For any *part* of the planning or execution of 9/11 to be coordinated by the US federal govt it would be the biggest (and flawlessly executed) conspiracy in the history of the world times about 100x. Would take, what, 1000-5000 people to be in the know? No one has talked? No one has a page of specs or a thumb drive with evidence to leak in the age of leaks? Where’s John H. Financiaanalyst noticing men with dynamite loading up the WTC for a year in advance for prep? “Don’t mind us John, this isn’t dynamite we’re strapping to all these load bearing girders!”
Sorry man. Some militant moooslims flew planes into buildings amid terrible airport security and even worse foreign/domestic intel.
The government isn't going to release anything they don't want you to know about. Not saying JFK is a conspiracy or that it isn't. Either way the government is going to tell you what they think you need to hear, not the truth. You really think they're gonna ruin their own reputation? That's laughable. However, no one will ever convince me that 9/11 was exactly as they said it was. I will take it to my grave that it was an inside job.
Science will tell you that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, and reason will tell you that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't have the authority to control the Secret Service in Dallas..but I will take a glass of champagne, Thank You.
Drank the koolaid, eh?Science will tell you that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, and reason will tell you that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't have the authority to control the Secret Service in Dallas..but I will take a glass of champagne, Thank You.
maybe on 911...but JFK?..No! no way I'm buying the Warren Report..Drank the koolaid, eh?
The man is dead. Show some respect.Shakespeare says, "Hi".
Demolition theory proponents, such as Brigham Young University physicist Steven E. Jones, architect Richard Gage, software engineer Jim Hoffman, and theologian David Ray Griffin, argue that the aircraft impacts and resulting fires could not have weakened the buildings sufficiently to initiate a catastrophic collapse, and that the buildings would not have collapsed completely, nor at the speeds that they did, without additional factors weakening the structures.Jesus man, are you serious?
For one, your two statements don’t mesh. Of course it’s likely it didn’t happen as stated exactly. Sure. You could go as far as saying we shot down United 93 to keep it from getting to DC. Does not make it an “inside job”.
For any *part* of the planning or execution of 9/11 to be coordinated by the US federal govt it would be the biggest (and flawlessly executed) conspiracy in the history of the world times about 100x. Would take, what, 1000-5000 people to be in the know? No one has talked? No one has a page of specs or a thumb drive with evidence to leak in the age of leaks? Where’s John H. Financiaanalyst noticing men with dynamite loading up the WTC for a year in advance for prep? “Don’t mind us John, this isn’t dynamite we’re strapping to all these load bearing girders!”
Sorry man. Some militant moooslims flew planes into buildings amid terrible airport security and even worse foreign/domestic intel.
So was Newtown a hoax?The general message that the anti-conspiracy crowd attempts to sell is moronic and supremely naive. Well accepted is that men and governments will in fact form conspiracy. Our country was formed this way - a conspiracy against the British throne. So you are to accept that men and governments will form conspiracies to achieve an outcome, but never when that outcome is to conceal a truth.
Let me help you:Demolition theory proponents, such as Brigham Young University physicist Steven E. Jones, architect Richard Gage, software engineer Jim Hoffman, and theologian David Ray Griffin, argue that the aircraft impacts and resulting fires could not have weakened the buildings sufficiently to initiate a catastrophic collapse, and that the buildings would not have collapsed completely, nor at the speeds that they did, without additional factors weakening the structures.
In the article "Active Thermotic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", which appeared in the Open Chemical Physics Journal, authors Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry, Jeffrey Farrer of Brigham Young University's Department of Physics and Astronomy, Steven E. Jones, and others state that thermite and nano-thermite composites in the dust and debris were found following the collapse of the three buildings, which they conclude to be proof that explosives brought down the buildings. The article contained no scientific rebuttal and the editor in chief of the publication subsequently resigned.
I think you are paranoid and deluded. Why would our government spend time/money to pull off these great coups? Do we have roguish types working in government? Sure. How do I know this? Because there are those types everywhere.The general message that the anti-conspiracy crowd attempts to sell is moronic and supremely naive. Well accepted is that men and governments will in fact form conspiracy. Our country was formed this way - a conspiracy against the British throne. So you are to accept that men and governments will form conspiracies to achieve an outcome, but never when that outcome is to conceal a truth.
Nothing in my argument was even about jet fuel melting steel beams. There was literally traces of thermite and nano thermite traces in the air. This proves there were explosives. No scientists disputed this.....Let me help you:
FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."
"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/
Bingo. You can't get 3 people to keep a secret, but somehow thousands of people have kept this great conspiracy to themselves.Jesus man, are you serious?
For one, your two statements don’t mesh. Of course it’s likely it didn’t happen as stated exactly. Sure. You could go as far as saying we shot down United 93 to keep it from getting to DC. Does not make it an “inside job”.
For any *part* of the planning or execution of 9/11 to be coordinated by the US federal govt it would be the biggest (and flawlessly executed) conspiracy in the history of the world times about 100x. Would take, what, 1000-5000 people to be in the know? No one has talked? No one has a page of specs or a thumb drive with evidence to leak in the age of leaks? Where’s John H. Financiaanalyst noticing men with dynamite loading up the WTC for a year in advance for prep? “Don’t mind us John, this isn’t dynamite we’re strapping to all these load bearing girders!”
Sorry man. Some militant moooslims flew planes into buildings amid terrible airport security and even worse foreign/domestic intel.
No but you quoted a source that claimed the following. Your quote not mine:Nothing in my argument was even about jet fuel melting steel beams. There was literally traces of thermite and nano thermite traces in the air. This proves there were explosives. No scientists disputed this.....
Yes or no answer. Was it a hoax?So the message now is that persons who have accepted any occasional possibility of truth concealment must also accept all random musings of it? This is precisely your logic. This is your foundation for accurate accusations, tin foil hats, paranoia, et al. Magnificent entertainment value you provide.
Wrong again.Nothing in my argument was even about jet fuel melting steel beams. There was literally traces of thermite and nano thermite traces in the air. This proves there were explosives. No scientists disputed this.....
I have no issues with people who think truth was concealed on occasion, but on this grand of scale? Ridiculous. This is how they get the title of “conspiracy theorist”. It’s a pattern of behavior.So the message now is that persons who have accepted any occasional possibility of truth concealment must also accept all random musings of it? This is precisely your logic. This is your foundation for accurate accusations, tin foil hats, paranoia, et al. Magnificent entertainment value you provide.