Kentucky foul shooting has been remarkable

UKErik

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
27,441
3,092
0
If the 2011 and 2014 teams could have hit foul shots like this years squad, Kentucky might be playing for national championship #11 this year.

In the last ten games, Kentucky has shot an unbelievable 77.2% from the line.

Since missing three foul shots against Ole Miss, Towns has hit 60-69 from the line (87%).

I can't remember a better stretch of foul shooting from a UK team or UK big man.

GBB!!!
 

Conn501

Senior
Nov 26, 2005
2,052
631
0
Was just talking about this. It feels like the best free throw shooting uk team ive ever seen lately. They are money at the line
 

FiveStarCat

All-American
Oct 3, 2009
10,758
5,580
0
Pretty amazing. Per Kyle Tucker, Towns' numbers are even more impressive going back the last 13 games. 44-48, 91.7%.
 

Anon1636470744

All-Conference
Jun 26, 2010
2,479
1,474
113
Making free throws in the grind it out games in the tournament are crucial to continuing on or going home
so let's hope it continues.
 

Cawood86_rivals

Heisman
Feb 20, 2005
36,711
64,715
0
Originally posted by UKErik:
If the 2011 and 2014 teams could have hit foul shots like this years squad, Kentucky might be playing for national championship #11 this year.

In the last ten games, Kentucky has shot an unbelievable 77.2% from the line.

Since missing three foul shots against Ole Miss, Towns has hit 60-69 from the line (87%).

I can't remember a better stretch of foul shooting from a UK team or UK big man.

GBB!!!
True and a very overlooked stat for this team.
 

Runt#1969

All-American
Dec 13, 2010
20,649
7,776
113
The only time I ever got in on a call to the Matt Jones show (I know, I know !
) was right after the first bama' game (I think) when we shot what was it, 16-18 from the free throw stripe? I had to try and call in to give kudos for that performance and said it would pay dividends later in the season.

Sure hope it stays that way, it's been really special to see so far.

PS - Why do they call it a free "throw" ? I say they should call it a free "shot." I mean, that's what it really is. A free THROW implies something less than a decent chance of actually making it, in my mind. A free shot would be much better and denote a better chance of making it, but I guess free throw just sounds better. OK, enough of my rant for the day !
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Last post-season UK shot 85/126 for 67.4% from the line. That is not terrible, but not good either. The national title game against UCONN was the only real horrendous performance, although there was another 6/11 kinda clunker in there against Michigan in the Elite 8.

The point is...you can overcome missing a few you should not with 5 out of 11 (Michigan) but if you take 24, you cannot miss 11 of them (like against UCONN). I'll also note it only takes one bad game to cost a team a title game....and FT shooting is not the only factor, and it never is honestly.

I remember in 2011 we shot 4/12 from the FT line against UCONN, but also got screwed on several key calls (like last year a well), Brandon Knight went all Kobe/Iveron on UK shooting the ball like 26 times (after UK got to the FInal Four with balanced and shared shooting responsibilities), etc. Yes, it is easy to say "If we went 6/12 even we win and probably win the national title" but I thin that is a flawed, narrowminded view on the game of basketball.

Free throws are huge though, no argument there. You can argue it was the #1 factor UK lost to UCONN both times, but it was not the ONLY reason. UK's inability to take the lead, and score in the half court last season was especially pathetic against UCONN. UK missed tons of wide open 3's, and did a bunch of other stupid stuff and had a lot of possessions in a row down 1-2 points and kept turning it over or missing shots.

I digress, I do not want to think about these games anymore.
 

wildcatdonf

Hall of Famer
Sep 26, 2003
78,022
128,835
0
You can tell that the guys have been working on it. Great FT shooting. Very proud of our team.
Good post.