
Louisville fans demand 2013 national title back after Michigan’s soft punishment
Louisville was forced to vacate its 2013 NCAA championship, but after Michigan got a slap on the wrist for its cheating scandal, Cardinals fans want it back.
Don’t give Michigan ideas.I wasn’t aware Michigan hired hookers to spy on their opponents.
That’s dumb. How about take money out of their pockets, announce second place is the winner and block them from playing for however many years? If you don’t handle it appropriately, then why would they stop cheating? Like when corporations do something illegal or awful and only pay 10 million but made 10 billion profit. That’s how you end up with the pain pill problem we had.This opinion is probably not going to be popular but I feel the same way about this as I do about disqualifications in horse racing. If somebody breaks the rules take some money out of their pocket for it; don't tell us it didn't finish the way it finished.
Baffert got like a 5 year ban at Churchill for cheating. A buddy of mine said Baffert was giving his horses thyroid meds and killing a bunch of them. He is in horse med business and he hates Baffert. UL cheated so why not strip their title. Rozelle just played down to the NCAA and gave up. Glad he got gone!!That’s dumb. How about take money out of their pockets, announce second place is the winner and block them from playing for however many years? If you don’t handle it appropriately, then why would they stop cheating? Like when corporations do something illegal or awful and only pay 10 million but made 10 billion profit. That’s how you end up with the pain pill problem we had.
Maybe I'd feel differently if the removing of wins was done in a fair and consistent manner...but that has NEVER been the case. It's always just been a matter of who the NCAA wants to screw and UK has never been one of the favorite sons.That’s dumb. How about take money out of their pockets, announce second place is the winner and block them from playing for however many years? If you don’t handle it appropriately, then why would they stop cheating? Like when corporations do something illegal or awful and only pay 10 million but made 10 billion profit. That’s how you end up with the pain pill problem we had.
I feel the same way about BB. They did the same thing to him as I suggest about cheating coaches. They at least stoppedBaffert got like a 5 year ban at Churchill for cheating. A buddy of mine said Baffert was giving his horses thyroid meds and killing a bunch of them. He is in horse med business and he hates Baffert. UL cheated so why not strip their title. Rozelle just played down to the NCAA and gave up. Glad he got gone!!
Be careful, you will get labeled with a true post like that. People don’t want to believe there is any favoritism. Sports are clean and sacred.Maybe I'd feel differently if the removing of wins was done in a fair and consistent manner...but that has NEVER been the case. It's always just been a matter of who the NCAA wants to screw and UK has never been one of the favorite sons.
UofL will have the banner hanging within the next 4 years.
So cheating is fine is what you’re saying. Got it.This opinion is probably not going to be popular but I feel the same way about this as I do about disqualifications in horse racing. If somebody breaks the rules take some money out of their pocket for it; don't tell us it didn't finish the way it finished.
No, I was not saying that. Piss off. (I said that)So cheating is fine is what you’re saying. Got it.
Do I think schools like UNC and now Michigan should have received a stiffer punishment? Absolutely. However, two wrongs don’t make a right. UofL was providing prostitutes to players, recruits (some minors), and their guardians on visits. I would still say that is more egregious than stealing signs.Maybe I'd feel differently if the removing of wins was done in a fair and consistent manner...but that has NEVER been the case. It's always just been a matter of who the NCAA wants to screw and UK has never been one of the favorite sons.
partly agree but,, Rozelle might have bent over and took it because he didn't want everything we did uncovered.No they should not get it back, if they were to it would mean they didn’t learn anything. You can bet if it were UK, there would not be a single basketball fan anywhere that would say they should give it back. Kentucky almost got the death penalty for less than what Louisville did and the NCAA really didn’t prove anything. Rozelle just bent over and took it.
Especially with NIL now.Be careful, you will get labeled with a true post like that. People don’t want to believe there is any favoritism. Sports are clean and sacred.
I wouldn’t be so sure of that.Louisville is lucky to have a basketball team after what they pulled. The title ain't coming back. Never happened. And anyone that pretends like it still counts is breaking the law and needs to be arrested.
Geez, like hookers don’t go to parties on campuses. You‘d think they took fake classes (oops…UNC did).Those idiots completely gloss over the fact that they were literally engaged in prostitution on campus, and in some cases, with underaged recruits. There can be no comparative analysis with other cases because what UL did is unprecedented.
Arbitrary?Geez, like hookers don’t go to parties on campuses. You‘d think they took fake classes (oops…UNC did).
The entire ruling was arbitrary and ripe to be challenged in court. The latest Michigan ruling has now given UofL legal precedent.
Michigan just got off pretty much Scott free for blatantly cheating. NCAA’s reasoning? The players shouldn’t be penalized for actions made by coaches no longer at the school. Precedent now?Arbitrary?
Also, what court has jurisdiction or legal authority to order the NCAA to restore the championship?
Nothing about the Michigan case and UL case is similar. You, like the fools who previously tried to argue the same thing, want to completely gloss over the immorality of providing prostitutes to underage recruits. To equate that with improper cash benefits or sign stealing is to ignore the reality of the situation.Michigan just got off pretty much Scott free for blatantly cheating. NCAA’s reasoning? The players shouldn’t be penalized for actions made by coaches no longer at the school. Precedent now?
Luke Hancock was MVP of a game that didn’t exist. Does that make sense?
Sue for civil and see if the NCAA has the stomach. My guess is that they don’t/won’t.
Stop.Nothing about the Michigan case and UL case is similar. You, like the fools who previously tried to argue the same thing, want to completely gloss over the immorality of providing prostitutes to underage recruits. To equate that with improper cash benefits or sign stealing is to ignore the reality of the situation.
Also appears you concede there is no legal basis for a court to order the title to be reinstated.