From hiring Petrino. They must be completely miserable and embarrassed right now.
So are we.FSU a little overrated perhaps? :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
There is a slight difference between winning a war to preserve the union than winning football games.Lincoln said something about Grant during the Civil War to a guy who said "he drinks too much, remove him" and Lincoln said (paraphrasing) "I cannot spare this man, he fights"
Same thing with Petrino despite his issues, "he wins"
Well they did whip Charleston Southern soundly. Top three for sure...FSU a little overrated perhaps? :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
Oh yeah that's so clear right now. Louisville is sure hurting so bad right now from hiring him. Mitch had no reason to give him a second chance and forgive someone for making a mistake.There is a slight difference between winning a war to preserve the union than winning football games.
No one ever claimed Petrino wasn't a great coach, he is. He wins game, but at what cost? Do you think Arkansas' AD was glad he hired him? Petrino put that school in potential legal trouble with him having a relationship with a woman he hired onto the staff. He wins games, but it's clear to see why Mitch and plenty of other ADs stayed away.
There is a slight difference between winning a war to preserve the union than winning football games.
No one ever claimed Petrino wasn't a great coach, he is. He wins game, but at what cost? Do you think Arkansas' AD was glad he hired him? Petrino put that school in potential legal trouble with him having a relationship with a woman he hired onto the staff. He wins games, but it's clear to see why Mitch and plenty of other ADs stayed away.
There is a slight difference between winning a war to preserve the union than winning football games.
No one ever claimed Petrino wasn't a great coach, he is. He wins game, but at what cost? Do you think Arkansas' AD was glad he hired him? Petrino put that school in potential legal trouble with him having a relationship with a woman he hired onto the staff. He wins games, but it's clear to see why Mitch and plenty of other ADs stayed away.
And he's doing it with recruiting classes that are no better than ours.RISK vs Reward. A contract could have been worded in such a way with claw backs and holding him accountable, etc...UL did not stay away and it looks like they hit a homerun, maybe grand slam because if they stay at this pace and can beat Houston later in the year they could be playing for the national championship.
I think Arkansas wanted to keep petrino but just couldn't because of public scrutiny.There is a slight difference between winning a war to preserve the union than winning football games.
No one ever claimed Petrino wasn't a great coach, he is. He wins game, but at what cost? Do you think Arkansas' AD was glad he hired him? Petrino put that school in potential legal trouble with him having a relationship with a woman he hired onto the staff. He wins games, but it's clear to see why Mitch and plenty of other ADs stayed away.
So Mitch now gets credit for hiring Cal?Jurich will be fired this week. What an abomination of a football program. So glad our AD is a moral upstanding guy. Same guy who hired Calipari BTW.
He did get a freaking awesome QBAnd he's doing it with recruiting classes that are no better than ours.
Their AD isnt a retardHow does such a POS undeserving school get this?
No, it's really NOT clear anymore. UofL is up 49-10 over NUMBER TWO FLORIDA STATE and NOBODY is talking about Petrino's past indiscretions.There is a slight difference between winning a war to preserve the union than winning football games.
No one ever claimed Petrino wasn't a great coach, he is. He wins game, but at what cost? Do you think Arkansas' AD was glad he hired him? Petrino put that school in potential legal trouble with him having a relationship with a woman he hired onto the staff. He wins games, but it's clear to see why Mitch and plenty of other ADs stayed away.
I didn't take a swipe at Cal. Cal had a perception of being shady and Mitch DIDN'T WANT TO HIRE HIM. But he did, and then refused to hire Petrino for past indiscretions?So Mitch now gets credit for hiring Cal?
I'm not sticking up for him by any means with this post - but just pointing out that for some time now people on here who hate Mitch claim he did not hire Cal.
That said - I was in the Petrino camp back when we had the chance to hire him. UK & MB whiffed no doubt. They look like the #1 team in the country right now and it's not even close.
Also, you take a swipe at Cal. Cal is not only a great coach, but an upstanding citizen. Think of all the millions of dollars he's raised for various causes (Haiti telethon, the softball game for Louisiana flood victim, etc.). Cal uses his celebrity status to do good things for people in need. How anyone can claim he's shady is beyond me.
They have to beat Clemson on the road too.RISK vs Reward. A contract could have been worded in such a way with claw backs and holding him accountable, etc...UL did not stay away and it looks like they hit a homerun, maybe grand slam because if they stay at this pace and can beat Houston later in the year they could be playing for the national championship.
How does such a POS undeserving school get this?
He did get a freaking awesome QB
Hypocrite? You're the one now giving Mitch credit for hiring Cal.I didn't take a swipe at Cal. Cal had a perception of being shady and Mitch DIDN'T WANT TO HIRE HIM. But he did, and then refused to hire Petrino for past indiscretions?
Hypocrite.
Mitch was told to hire Cal or he wouldn't have a job any longer.Hypocrite? You're the one now giving Mitch credit for hiring Cal.
So he didn't hire him? Which is it? You and Prime MF need to get your heads together and keep me posted as to who was responsible for hiring Cal.Mitch was told to hire Cal or he wouldn't have a job any longer.
He did get a freaking awesome QB
Barnhart's a hypocrite. He hires Cal despite his 'better judgment' but doesn't hire Petrino.Hypocrite? You're the one now giving Mitch credit for hiring Cal.
Its not hard to figure out. He was forced by the boosters to hire Cal even though he didnt want to.So he didn't hire him? Which is it? You and Prime MF need to get your heads together and keep me posted as to who was responsible for hiring Cal.
Prime's point - I think - was that Mitch did hire Cal, who had a shady reputation...but Mitch refused to hire Petrino, who had a shady reputation. Therefore, Mitch is a "hypocrite".
Ignore the gaslighter. He's a Mitch fan.Its not hard to figure out. He was forced by the boosters to hire Cal even though he didnt want to.
I originally misunderstood. I'm with u now.Barnhart's a hypocrite. He hires Cal despite his 'better judgment' but doesn't hire Petrino.
Try and keep up, kthxbai
Yea UL is a great team and Petrino is an awfully good coach. However, if you can't see why an AD would stay away from Petrino after what he did at Arkansas you don't really understand what goes on for an AD. To fans it can be solely about wins and losses. ADs don't have that luxury. Mitch and plenty other ADs weren't willing to risk the trouble with what may happen with Petrino. If you can't see that, you clearly don't understand the argument.No, it's really NOT clear anymore. UofL is up 49-10 over NUMBER TWO FLORIDA STATE and NOBODY is talking about Petrino's past indiscretions.
So he wasn't responsible for hiring him....which means that he's not a hypocrite based on Prime MF's theory. You two are actually at odds here.Its not hard to figure out. He was forced by the boosters to hire Cal even though he didnt want to.
More like flamethrower. Get it straight.Ignore the gaslighter. He's a Mitch fan.