Good summary of personnel.Every ranking I've seen has Purdue top 10-15. I just don't see it. They have the 2 guards, who were good supporting players, but I'm not sure they are lead guys. Top 25, maybe, but not top 10.
In comparison, UK has the following 12 guys:
- 4 guys who started (I'm counting JR since he played starter minutes & was leading scorer) for P5 teams
- 1 guy who as a FR last year was a part-time starter for a P5 team
- 1 guy who started for a F4 team 2 years ago
- 1 high-mid-major guy who was the top returning 3pt shooter in the nation
- 1 mid-major guy who was Defensive POY in his conference
- 1 mid-major guy who led his team in scoring
- 1 top 40 recruit from 3 years ago
- 2 top 100 recruits
So our top 8 guys are all comparable to the top 2 Purdue guys, and they don't have 8 guys like that.
But still, this ranking of #15 for UK seems about right.
What would worry me if I were an AR fan is Norlander's comment/concern that Wagner and Davis (the presumed starting backcourt) may be too similar. I assumed Davis was a really good 3pt. shooter and scorer. If not, then I think AR has a potential issue there.I think he is close. I think this team will be top 10 by end of year (and I’ll accept it if they aren’t in his first year), but I think they are. He has Arkansas at 25. I think he did his homework.
Arkansas has the talent to be good but I don’t see the team being anymore prepared for game time than they were the last 5-7 years. Cal’s mentality of play the game to get better vs winning always looses. It was never about talent with Cal.What would worry me if I were an AR fan is Norlander's comment/concern that Wagner and Davis (the presumed starting backcourt) may be too similar. I assumed Davis was a really good 3pt. shooter and scorer. If not, then I think AR has a potential issue there.
No. Please don't, lol.Good summary of personnel.
Do you happen to have star rankings of our roster ?? That would be interesting to see ...
What would worry me if I were an AR fan is Norlander's comment/concern that Wagner and Davis (the presumed starting backcourt) may be too similar. I assumed Davis was a really good 3pt. shooter and scorer. If not, then I think AR has a potential issue there.
And those guards got SO MUCH because of Edey. I'm not seeing it for this year, either.Every ranking I've seen has Purdue top 10-15. I just don't see it. They have the 2 guards, who were good supporting players, but I'm not sure they are lead guys. But the past 2 years, 90% of what made them very good was Edey, not just a dominating player, but a player dominating in a way that no one else was. Top 25, maybe, but not top 10.
In comparison, UK has the following 12 guys:
- 4 guys who started (I'm counting JR since he played starter minutes & was leading scorer) for P5 teams
- 1 guy who as a FR last year was a part-time starter for a P5 team
- 1 guy who started for a F4 team 2 years ago
- 1 high-mid-major guy who was the top returning 3pt shooter in the nation
- 1 mid-major guy who was Defensive POY in his conference
- 1 mid-major guy who led his team in scoring
- 1 top 40 recruit from 3 years ago
- 2 top 100 recruits
So our top 8 guys are all comparable to the top 2 Purdue guys, and they don't have 8 guys like that.
But still, this ranking of #15 for UK seems about right.