Toggle sidebar

Meanwhile, Wisconsin losing....

W

wldktz1

Senior
Dec 12, 2013
1,603
919
0
Originally posted by loublue22:
nobody wants a 1 seed
Click to expand...
Can't even give them away.
 
U

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
It's not a big deal, they are tied near the half...they should pull away in the 2nd half against an overrated Purdue team.
 
U

ukfan606

Senior
Oct 27, 2007
6,604
483
0
It's up to them win Big 10 get one seed Lose and they are our 2 and they won't make it to the final 4.
 
H

HenryMuto

Heisman
Mar 31, 2012
18,812
12,206
0
If Wisky didn't have that terrible loss at Rutgers I think they would be a lock for a 2 seed. Just think they played half the year without Treavon Jackson as well.
 
U

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Originally posted by HenryMuto:

If Wisky didn't have that terrible loss at Rutgers I think they would be a lock for a 2 seed. Just think they played half the year without Treavon Jackson as well.
Click to expand...
You mean a lock for the #2 1 seed?

Wisconsin is not going to be punished for Rutgers. The committee knows, like we do, that Kaminsky was out that game. That loss is not going to prevent them from getting a 1 seed.
 
U

UKWildcatT

All-American
Apr 9, 2009
75,546
8,113
0
Originally posted by HenryMuto:

If Wisky didn't have that terrible loss at Rutgers I think they would be a lock for a 2 seed. Just think they played half the year without Treavon Jackson as well.
Click to expand...
I'm confused...they were a lock for a two anyways and are playing towards a one.
 
U

UKEE93

Senior
Jan 28, 2003
3,027
944
0
Originally posted by HeismanWildcat85:
They are one win away from being a one seed. No way they don't get it.
Click to expand...
Lunardi just on ESPN moved them to a #1 seed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom