Sad thing is we could have had him. He might tell us to go fly a kite now if we asked. But after what I saw today I think we're getting to the point it's worth asking. But apparently that can't happen because we owe the current coach $154,567,327,899,432,652,890,931,456,765 whether he's coaching or not.
Yeah, losing to a Vandy team in the SEC is better than beating #19 UCLA on the road. We are SEC.
dumbest take ever. Leach went to a bowl in yr 2 and is having his best so far in yr 4 at WSU. his team has NEVER during his time there made all the numerous coaching blunders like this staff has. It is very obvious to see someone who knows what he's doing vs someone who does not if you just open your eyes.
No worse than pulling the trigger faster than Pitino and signing the guy to a 5 year extension that mortgages the entire university halfway through year two.
yes, but at least WSU had a coach who had coached, who had won, who had achieved success at a level higher than had been achieved before at a place. right now we have none of that - only uncertainty and a long contract.
no, my proof is his track record (please see his TTech record, doesn't sound like you're familiar) Stoops has no track record other than here - and it's pathetic.
Even if you have only followed football for the last three years a Google search should enable you to find out that Leach had a prior job before WSU. Amazing that people dont know that he brought Texas Tech to the level he did.
