For me, the PFP rankings are especially ridiculous. All kinds of inconsistencies in it as compared to where wrestlers rank in their weight class
Other:
The PFP are just bad. Having Lockett and Vega in after less than 10 matches doesn’t make sense. Having them ahead of someone like Rocco who is a NCAA runner up makes less senseFor me, the PFP rankings are especially ridiculous. All kinds of inconsistencies in it as compared to where wrestlers rank in their weight class
P4P rankings are just dumb in generalThe PFP are just bad. Having Lockett and Vega in after less than 10 matches doesn’t make sense. Having them ahead of someone like Rocco who is a NCAA runner up makes less sense
Other:
Yea I don't know how I feel about Melvin plus 17, 23 and 47 over PSU having 2, 6, 8, 10, 94, 100. Melvin is good enough where I think it is still fair even though I would probably flip them
I think we all care to some point which is why there are multiple threads on the topic as we speak. Flo is doing a masterful job if you ask me. Not in the actual rankings. Those aren’t the best but in getting people to click and then talk about them. It’s generated a ton of dialogue which is the point of them doing the rankingsI voted “other”. The most ridiculous thing about Flo’s rankings isn’t the rankings, it’s how seriously the rankers take themselves. I listened to them argue back and forth about PJ Duke the other night for 15-minutes and nearly pulled my hair out. “Our rankings are not a prediction, We have established protocols, blah blah blah”. Who cares!?