Yep.Originally posted by TexKat:
Phog Allen
Branch McCracken
Henry Iba
Adolph Rupp
Rick Barnes...LOL...you are a funny man! Thought you could slide that one by us eh? How about Mick Cronin? LOL!! Rick Barnes...that's a riot!Originally posted by bigbluelou:
Who's on it? For me:
Rupp
Kryzewski
Wooden (yeah, I know...)
Rick Barnes
Yep.Originally posted by Raroyder:
Coach K has multiple championships spanning across 3 decades, and 1000 wins in the modern era, so he is on there, much to some chagrin:
Rupp
Wooden
Coach K
Phog Allen
Antonio Santi Giuseppe Meucci is credited for developing a voice-communication apparatus which several sources credit as the first telephone. (Alexander Graham Bell was granted a patent for the electromagnetic transmission of vocal sound by undulatory electric current.)Originally posted by miracle7s:
No mentions of James Naismith? He did invent basketball
I just have to laugh at the people who do not put John Wooden on the list.
10 NCAA titles in his last 12 seasons
7 straight national championships.
won 88 straight games, an NCAA record that hasn't come close to falling.
4 30-0 seasons
19 conference championships
38-game tournament winning streak
.804 winning percentage
Didn't you just contradict yourself?Originally posted by rabidcatfan:
If it were to be designed as of today, then the mount rushmore of college coaches would probably consist of Krzyzewski, Bobby Knight, Adolph Rupp, and Dean Smith (4 of the top 5 winningest D-I coaches of all time). No way John Wooden gets up there considering he's not even close on the list of winningest coaches, I dont care how many championships he won at UCLA, and Jim Boeheim is like the red-headed stepchild of the list. In fact, even if Boeheim outlasts Coach K (which I doubt since K is 3 years younger), and managed to catch K or even surpass him, I dont beleive he'd still be regarded in the same way K is. Just my opinion of course.
Maybe because of Sam GilbertOriginally posted by MWes11:
I just have to laugh at the people who do not put John Wooden on the list.
10 NCAA titles in his last 12 seasons
7 straight national championships.
won 88 straight games, an NCAA record that hasn't come close to falling.
4 30-0 seasons
19 conference championships
38-game tournament winning streak
.804 winning percentage
Anytime someone is forced to stay away from any organization, such was the case with Sam Gilbert and UCLA, it smells of something really bad.Originally posted by crestcat:
Maybe because of Sam GilbertOriginally posted by MWes11:
I just have to laugh at the people who do not put John Wooden on the list.
10 NCAA titles in his last 12 seasons
7 straight national championships.
won 88 straight games, an NCAA record that hasn't come close to falling.
4 30-0 seasons
19 conference championships
38-game tournament winning streak
.804 winning percentage
Did they ever get in trouble? Sure, it was extremely shady, but you cannot argue with the numbers that Wooden put up.Originally posted by rexfan1:
Anytime someone is forced to stay away from any organization, such was the case with Sam Gilbert and UCLA, it smells of something really bad.Originally posted by crestcat:
Maybe because of Sam GilbertOriginally posted by MWes11:
I just have to laugh at the people who do not put John Wooden on the list.
10 NCAA titles in his last 12 seasons
7 straight national championships.
won 88 straight games, an NCAA record that hasn't come close to falling.
4 30-0 seasons
19 conference championships
38-game tournament winning streak
.804 winning percentage
Yep, that has to be it.Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
Coach K, Coach Wooden, Coach Knight and Coach Rupp.
Did Wooden ever get an NCAA violation or put UCLA on probation during his tenure? If so, please explain as I am unaware.Originally posted by Woodford Reserve 126:
(1) Phog Allen
(2) Rupp
(3) Dean Smith
(4) K
Sorry, Wooden, no cheaters allowed on my mountain.
You're proving my point. The number are there because it was so shady. No he didnt get caught but, neither Duke and K in the Corey Maggette case.Originally posted by MWes11:
Did they ever get in trouble? Sure, it was extremely shady, but you cannot argue with the numbers that Wooden put up.Originally posted by rexfan1:
Anytime someone is forced to stay away from any organization, such was the case with Sam Gilbert and UCLA, it smells of something really bad.Originally posted by crestcat:
Maybe because of Sam GilbertOriginally posted by MWes11:
I just have to laugh at the people who do not put John Wooden on the list.
10 NCAA titles in his last 12 seasons
7 straight national championships.
won 88 straight games, an NCAA record that hasn't come close to falling.
4 30-0 seasons
19 conference championships
38-game tournament winning streak
.804 winning percentage
I understand the Sam Gilbert connection and how shady it was. But for me, if he never "officially" was put on probation or sanctioned during his tenure, I have to put him on the list. I believe the NCAA did touch on this, but Wooden used the "look the other way" method and he was never punished by the NCAA. If he was punished and wins were vacated/titles taken away, then I would not put him on the mountain either. Until that happens, he has to be one of the greatest college coaches of all time. That being said, I respect your opinion of not putting him on the list.Originally posted by .S&C.:
Wes I believe the Ncaa has acknowledged the massive cheating going on at UCLA during the tenure of Wooden and Gilbert. They just claimed it was in the past and let it go. I've got the ncaa past 100 years book, and even in the UCLA section they allow references to SAM Gilbert.
It's well documented even if sanctions didn't come down at the time. Wooden was a cheat. I wouldn't put him on the list.
So who would be on your mountain then? Obviously, by that statement, you wouldn't have Coach K on it either, correct?Originally posted by rexfan1:
You're proving my point. The number are there because it was so shady. No he didnt get caught but, neither Duke and K in the Corey Maggette case.Originally posted by MWes11:
Did they ever get in trouble? Sure, it was extremely shady, but you cannot argue with the numbers that Wooden put up.Originally posted by rexfan1:
Anytime someone is forced to stay away from any organization, such was the case with Sam Gilbert and UCLA, it smells of something really bad.Originally posted by crestcat:
Maybe because of Sam GilbertOriginally posted by MWes11:
I just have to laugh at the people who do not put John Wooden on the list.
10 NCAA titles in his last 12 seasons
7 straight national championships.
won 88 straight games, an NCAA record that hasn't come close to falling.
4 30-0 seasons
19 conference championships
38-game tournament winning streak
.804 winning percentage
Get your facts straight. First off, the NCAA did not merely "claim it was in the past" with the Gilbert stuff, instead they eventually hammered UCLA with a couple years of sanctions and probation for the Gilbert stuff around 79 or 80.Originally posted by .S&C.:
Wes I believe the Ncaa has acknowledged the massive cheating going on at UCLA during the tenure of Wooden and Gilbert. They just claimed it was in the past and let it go. I've got the ncaa past 100 years book, and even in the UCLA section they allow references to SAM Gilbert.
It's well documented even if sanctions didn't come down at the time. Wooden was a cheat. I wouldn't put him on the list.
Good post. The NCAA really started cracking down on boosters in the 80s. Remember the Herald Leader inspired investigation into the $100 handshakes in the UK program? The point being that many (maybe all) big time schools had boosters who were doling out "illegal" benefits to players. Gilbert may have been richer/more involved than most, but not necessarily so.Originally posted by UK90:
Get your facts straight. First off, the NCAA did not merely "claim it was in the past" with the Gilbert stuff, instead they eventually hammered UCLA with a couple years of sanctions and probation for the Gilbert stuff around 79 or 80.Originally posted by .S&C.:
Wes I believe the Ncaa has acknowledged the massive cheating going on at UCLA during the tenure of Wooden and Gilbert. They just claimed it was in the past and let it go. I've got the ncaa past 100 years book, and even in the UCLA section they allow references to SAM Gilbert.
It's well documented even if sanctions didn't come down at the time. Wooden was a cheat. I wouldn't put him on the list.
And it is NOT at all established that "Wooden was a cheat." , as there is NO evidence that Wooden himself evertook part in any sort of cheating. The shenanigans Sam Gilbert was up to occurred away from the court outside of Wooden's purview and without his consent. Indeed, by all accounts, Gilbert and Wooden never went near each other.
Now, of course, it certainly can be argued that Wooden should've known what Gilbert was up to and tried harder to put a stop to it. But, frankly, that could be said about nearly EVERY big time coach of that era (including our own), as sugar daddy boosters like Gilbert were prevalent at almost every major program during that era. But to suggest that Wooden was a direct participant in cheating is flat out false.