Totally agree. Also, taking money away from poorer people’s ability to pay health insurance so they can fund the tax cut for billionaires is insanity. Anyone that thinks they’re going to save money or get more back or whatever because they’re taking health insurance away from people are cutting off their nose to spite their face. But I digress.
I didn’t know they were randomized, I’ve never been tested but that would make much more sense.
Well I can’t vouch for how every company does it, but where I am it’s randomized. Otherwise and you’re just wasting your money on the drug test unless the tobacco user is an idiot.
It used to be here you weren’t even allowed to work here and be a tobacco user, but when they started facing staffing problems, they changed it to where you got to pay more for insurance to be a smoker. I can’t remember how much it is but it’s quite significant.
Everyone gets drug tested once they accept a job offer, and tobacco is one of the things they test for, so the company will know from day one if you’re a user or not.
If a person is trying to quit so they can avoid paying the increased premium, the only way they can get out of paying higher insurance premiums is to prove they are going thru a quitters program AND submit to randomized drug tobacco testing into perpetuity.
If they fail to provide proof of attendance for the program, fail a drug test, or don’t show up for the test, they are stuck paying the increased premium until they can get back on track.
The only loophole here is if you start smoking after starting work. You could then just lie at open enrollment and say you don’t smoke.