I enjoyed Senna but my favorite F1 doc is 1: Life On the Limit. Goes back to the period of rule change to bigger engines=faster cars but pre ww2 safety precautions.
I haven't seen this series but have planned on it. I'm a casual fan now but started watching when I was about 10 and caught every race I could in the late 70s through the 80s.
I enjoyed watching that one as well, but there were a couple things that bothered me about Life on the Limit.
One, I get that safety was the through line for the documentary, but it felt like much of the late 70s through the 80s were an afterthought. But that was still a very dangerous period. The 80s had some of the most insanely powerful cars ever (BMW was building 1.5L 4 cylinders with 1,100 HP in cars with little downforce). And guys like Gilles Villeneuve never show up in the documentary.
And while they were able to talk about Jim Clark to tee up why his death was so shocking, they kind of glossed over Senna who’s death was equally shocking. It was Senna’s death that spurred the FIA to get serious about safety. And not just for racers. A lot of the safety improvements implemented by auto manufacturers were driven by Max Mosley’s FIA initiatives.
And that period had an insane amount of legenadary drivers competing against each other. Senna alone raced against Lauda, Piquet, Prost, Schumacher, Hakkinen, Mansell and Hill. Those drivers won 21 combined world championships. That fact that many of them regard Senna as the best ever is why F1 is as safe as it is today. I don’t see how you can include so little of that in a documentary about how safety has evolved.
The other issue, and maybe this is just me, is that Life on the Limit just felt a little too congratulatory of Mosley and Ecclestone. Yes, they helped drive through improvements, but the documentary positions them as guardian angels of racing drivers and that feels a little too much like propaganda to me. However, that may just be me on that last point.