That's a low blow, sir.Originally posted by FearTheBeard:
Winning the SEC is like winning a contest for the tallest midget. What's your point?
It has nothing to do with legacy.Originally posted by blueberryfields:
That's a low blow, sir.Originally posted by FearTheBeard:
Winning the SEC is like winning a contest for the tallest midget. What's your point?
My only point, and I'm trying to be genuine here, is that it's good to be a Blue Devil. You play in a great conference--certainly better than the SEC. And, even if you don't win that conference, you'll still get a #1 seed in the Dance...even if the regular season champ of that great conference has less losses than you.
Speaks to Duke's legacy.
As to the latter, I agree. Best of luck, HeLooks2MuchLikeDave.Originally posted by HeLooks2MuchLikeDave:
You know what you are trying to do. Get lost. Hopefully we will play you this season.
It's hilarious when they think they're being coy.Originally posted by HeLooks2MuchLikeDave:
You know what you are trying to do. Get lost. Hopefully we will play you this season.
Thanks!Originally posted by blueberryfields:
4 losses and a #1 seed in the tourney. Good for you guys!
Duke beat Virginia head to head and UVA didn't have to play in Cameron which more than likely would have given them 1 more loss.Originally posted by blueberryfields:
That's a low blow, sir.Originally posted by FearTheBeard:
Winning the SEC is like winning a contest for the tallest midget. What's your point?
My only point, and I'm trying to be genuine here, is that it's good to be a Blue Devil. You play in a great conference--certainly better than the SEC. And, even if you don't win that conference, you'll still get a #1 seed in the Dance...even if the regular season champ of that great conference has less losses than you.
My bad. He/she is a KY fan so I should have assumed he/she is a moron. It's a safe bet.Originally posted by Devilicious:
I wouldn't feed the troll. He/she obviously didn't do their research to even look at the resume. The only thing the poster is going off of is overall record. No team has more quality wins than Duke.
Nothing wrong with giving credit for winning games that are never even played, especially in this hypothetical UVA-visits- Cameron scenario. No-brainer, really.Originally posted by mo.st.dukie:
Duke beat Virginia head to head and UVA didn't have to play in Cameron which more than likely would have given them 1 more loss.Originally posted by blueberryfields:
That's a low blow, sir.Originally posted by FearTheBeard:
Winning the SEC is like winning a contest for the tallest midget. What's your point?
My only point, and I'm trying to be genuine here, is that it's good to be a Blue Devil. You play in a great conference--certainly better than the SEC. And, even if you don't win that conference, you'll still get a #1 seed in the Dance...even if the regular season champ of that great conference has less losses than you.
Why don't you put up KY's top 7 wins and we'll compare them to Duke's top 7 wins?Originally posted by blueberryfields:
Nothing wrong with giving credit for winning games that are never even played, especially in this hypothetical UVA-visits- Cameron scenario. No-brainer, really.Originally posted by mo.st.dukie:
Duke beat Virginia head to head and UVA didn't have to play in Cameron which more than likely would have given them 1 more loss.Originally posted by blueberryfields:
That's a low blow, sir.Originally posted by FearTheBeard:
Winning the SEC is like winning a contest for the tallest midget. What's your point?
My only point, and I'm trying to be genuine here, is that it's good to be a Blue Devil. You play in a great conference--certainly better than the SEC. And, even if you don't win that conference, you'll still get a #1 seed in the Dance...even if the regular season champ of that great conference has less losses than you.
Seriously. Where do these trolls come from? They have to be kids like age 1 or so. sensible adults aren't like that unless they are THR. Wait a minute. I might be on to something here. Could they be UNC/THR posters in disguise?Originally posted by Devilicious:
I wouldn't feed the troll. He/she obviously didn't do their research to even look at the resume. The only thing the poster is going off of is overall record. No team has more quality wins than Duke.
Point is: unbalanced conference schedule. Duke's overall resume is better than UVA's. Simple as that.Originally posted by blueberryfields:
Nothing wrong with giving credit for winning games that are never even played, especially in this hypothetical UVA-visits- Cameron scenario. No-brainer, really.Originally posted by mo.st.dukie:
Duke beat Virginia head to head and UVA didn't have to play in Cameron which more than likely would have given them 1 more loss.Originally posted by blueberryfields:
That's a low blow, sir.Originally posted by FearTheBeard:
Winning the SEC is like winning a contest for the tallest midget. What's your point?
My only point, and I'm trying to be genuine here, is that it's good to be a Blue Devil. You play in a great conference--certainly better than the SEC. And, even if you don't win that conference, you'll still get a #1 seed in the Dance...even if the regular season champ of that great conference has less losses than you.