Originally posted by denniden:
Exactly how do you hone your game with limited practice time allowed and having to go to class full time better than working with all kinds of coaches and playing the game for a living? Still waiting to hear a good answer to that question. One that is asked every time someone says that.
Good luck to Winslow. I think he is ready now for the NBA and he will work on his game while he gets paid to play on the highest level possible in basketball.
With the caveat that I personally think it makes sense for Winslow to go, I'd say a few things on the subject. First, I think people greatly overstate the restrictions on practice time that exist at the collegiate level. As the unionization case involving NW reveals, most guys in a high-level D-1 football or basketball program are spending anywhere from 50-60 hrs.on their respective sports during the season (when you count not only on-court practice, but individual shooting work, film sessions, weight lifting, physical therapy, etc.). It's not quite as much as you'd spend in the NBA, but it's not that far off. In the end of the day, the body can only take so many hours of running / exercising / shooting etc. To the extent an athlete does spend time studying, I really think that's taking far more from the kid's social life than it is from their basketball practice -- I mean reality is that guys in the NBA have a ton of down time and spend that extra time partying / focused on business ventures / etc. -- instead of playing b-ball day. Obviously most people don't lift the curtain behind what goes on at the NBA level, but lets not forget J-Will talking about how guys used to fly to Vegas on off-days to gamble, or would smoke pot on the day of games, etc. etc. In the end of the day, there's just a limit on how much basketball-related activities anyone can take --- and I frankly think guys at Duke and similar programs are pretty much doing everything they can to improve.
Second, in terms of long-term growth, there is certainly value to playing games as the focal point of the team in games that matter -- versus being a role player on a bad team in games that don't matter, or even playing in the D-league where it really doesn't matter. In terms of growth, I think there's definitely something a kid like Tyus gets from working on pick-on-roll offense in the Final 4 in front of 70k fans that he just can't get from playing 8 relatively meaningless 2nd quarter minutes in a Timberwolves v. Celtic games, or Winslow can't get as designated defender / three-point spacer who's not asked to work on creating off the dribble in games (b/c he's not ready to do that at the nba level). Also, there are obviously the intangibles, leadership talents you can develop in college that you just can't get until much later in the NBA -- b/c you're not in a position as a 20 yr. old role player to lead.
Third, in the case of Duke, I do think its arguable whether you're getting better coaching by Coach K than you can get at most bad NBA teams (i.e., not everyone is going to go play under Greg Popovich).