Toggle sidebar

No one, Not One, Absolutely ZERO

7

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83
..............members of the Obama Administration, or the Intelligence communities, testified they saw directly or indirectly, evidence of “Russian Collusion” with the Trump Campaign.
And Trump was the candidate with the “uneducated” support, .............. “PRICELESS”
 
Airport

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,358
7,112
113
WVUBRU said:
LMAO
Click to expand...
Please quote one of the people who testified that they had evidence? There is copious amount of evidence that Obama was behind this. Criminal behavior. I'm not in favor of prosecuting a former President but this is egregious. Too bad Bush didn't go after Obama, but , the Bush's have class.
 
7

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83
In his memoir, Facts and Fears: Hard Truths From a Life in Intelligence, Clapper offers a scathing assessment of President Trump and his ties to Russia. Clapper said, “I remember just how staggering the assessment felt the first time I read it through from start to finish, and just how SPECIFIC our conclusions and EVIDENCE were.”
..... Clapper under oath, and under the threat of perjury,
“I never saw any direct empirical EVIDENCE that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,” former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the committee in 2017.
..... Book can be found in the Fiction section next to the comics.
 
W

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
JFC, Clapper was talking about evidence of Russia meddling in the election. Yes, plenty of evidence. He then is asked under oath about Trump collusion. He wasn't investigating that directly. Comey and Mueller did most of that investigation in addition to both intelligence committees in Congress.

Putting two pieces of information together in order to spin a conclusion is a false narrative.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,250
3,323
113
WVUBRU said:
JFC, Clapper was talking about evidence of Russia meddling in the election. Yes, plenty of evidence. He then is asked under oath about Trump collusion. He wasn't investigating that directly. Comey and Mueller did most of that investigation in addition to both intelligence committees in Congress.

Putting two pieces of information together in order to spin a conclusion is a false narrative.
Click to expand...
Hahahahaha all the staggering amounts of evidence........Facebook ads of a couple of hundred thousand dollars...

You’re a useful idiot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom