No surprise. Alabama routs Wake Forest in exhibition game

Wunky

Heisman
Jan 16, 2021
4,278
17,775
78
Alabama has the potential to be crazy good this year. As a UK fan, this gives me hope that Pope's style can not only have success, but have sustained success.

Alabama is ok, but crazy good? I’m just not buying the hype. They kind of lucked out last year in the regional final getting to play UNC, a team that runs no matter what, even when it’s not in their best interest. There’s been many years where we didn’t have particularly good teams and yet still beat UNC due to their stubborn insistence on trying to beat us at our own game.

I know most won’t agree with me. A final four is a major accomplishment, regardless of how you get there. Certainly, Bama has been much more successful than UK as of late. But something about Oats just screams Bruce Pearl to me. Aka, a gimmick.
 

BBNinSC_rivals62411

All-American
Jan 2, 2015
2,788
5,695
0
Alabama is ok, but crazy good? I’m just not buying the hype. They kind of lucked out last year in the regional final getting to play UNC, a team that runs no matter what, even when it’s not in their best interest. There’s been many years where we didn’t have particularly good teams and yet still beat UNC due to their stubborn insistence on trying to beat us at our own game.

I know most won’t agree with me. A final four is a major accomplishment, regardless of how you get there. Certainly, Bama has been much more successful than UK as of late. But something about Oats just screams Bruce Pearl to me. Aka, a gimmick.
Alabama is like Gonzaga or Houston, they will have lofty rankings and win a lot of regular season games, but will never win a title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFCat11

katwest

Heisman
Feb 16, 2003
39,637
13,386
113
Alabama has always had crazy good potential, but never quite reaches it. Yes, they have been really good, They are like they always are, loaded with athleticism and will win a lot of games. Their preseason rankings always make them better than they are. They have had this kind of talent with better coaches than Nate Oats and always seem to flame out in the NCAA tournament.
 

GoBIG BLUE

Junior
Apr 1, 2023
397
364
63
Did Alabama do this without Grant Nelson? Or did he get injured during the match? I read earlier today he is now injured
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
43,483
77,642
113
Alabama is ok, but crazy good? I’m just not buying the hype. They kind of lucked out last year in the regional final getting to play UNC, a team that runs no matter what, even when it’s not in their best interest. There’s been many years where we didn’t have particularly good teams and yet still beat UNC due to their stubborn insistence on trying to beat us at our own game.

I know most won’t agree with me. A final four is a major accomplishment, regardless of how you get there. Certainly, Bama has been much more successful than UK as of late. But something about Oats just screams Bruce Pearl to me. Aka, a gimmick.
Maybe so, but Oats got the job done and 2 weeks before the end of the year we made them look like they didn’t belong in the tournament. That’s real coaching. Their style works and they have a good roster. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them at the top most of the year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wunky

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
43,483
77,642
113
Alabama has always had crazy good potential, but never quite reaches it. Yes, they have been really good, They are like they always are, loaded with athleticism and will win a lot of games. Their preseason rankings always make them better than they are. They have had this kind of talent with better coaches than Nate Oats and always seem to flame out in the NCAA tournament.
They just made the final 4, and the Miller year they went out earlier than they should have, but that happens.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
43,483
77,642
113
Found it. IU@ UT Sun. Oct.27 @ 3:00 ET, on SECN+. Should be an interesting match-up.
I’ll have to watch that one. Should be a good game. I want to see how Woodson uses their new roster because this is his make or break year and they spent for a good roster.
 

UKWildcats1987

Heisman
Sep 9, 2021
19,012
32,514
113
Maybe so, but Oats got the job done and 2 weeks before the end of the year we made them look like they didn’t belong in the tournament. That’s real coaching. Their style works and they have a good roster. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them at the top most of the year.

Oats would have been a slam dunk here. He took effing Alabama to a final four.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
43,483
77,642
113
Oats would have been a slam dunk here. He took effing Alabama to a final four.
No doubt, I wish the timing were better to make a run at him but I’m loving what Pope has done and he runs a similar style. No reason to think he can’t be as successful with better players here.
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
46,510
68,970
113
Not denying you heard that, but if that’s the case this staff/team is extremely tight lipped. And that would be a feat to pull off in this day and age.
And while it could be possible, I don't think Rick and St. Johns could roll into Lexington or Kentucky into MSG without SOMEONE saying something.
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
46,510
68,970
113
Oats would have been a slam dunk here. He took effing Alabama to a final four.
Would have been a solid hire. Not sure if he would have united the fanbase as much as Pope has though.

I think Oats was interested but family issues kept him at Bama.
 

Cold Stout Beer

Heisman
Dec 10, 2023
9,855
30,784
0
Alabama is like Gonzaga or Houston, they will have lofty rankings and win a lot of regular season games, but will never win a title.

Same Oats that was loaded last year and got run out of Rupp by a guy that cant coach. The Oats lovers are carnival clowns 🤡
 
Last edited:
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
Alabama is ok, but crazy good? I’m just not buying the hype. They kind of lucked out last year in the regional final getting to play UNC, a team that runs no matter what, even when it’s not in their best interest. There’s been many years where we didn’t have particularly good teams and yet still beat UNC due to their stubborn insistence on trying to beat us at our own game.

I know most won’t agree with me. A final four is a major accomplishment, regardless of how you get there. Certainly, Bama has been much more successful than UK as of late. But something about Oats just screams Bruce Pearl to me. Aka, a gimmick.
I agree with this.

Lets compare Alabama to UK. Returnees bolded.

ALABAMA
Sears 6'1 (33.6m, 21.5p, 4.2r, 4.0a, 1.6s, 43.6% 3pt)
Holloway 6'1 Auburn (20.2m, 7.3p, 2.7a, 30.2 3pt, 31.8% fg)
Philon (6'4 4* FR)

Wrightsell 6'3 (23.7m, 8.9p, 3.0r, 44.7% 3pt)
Mallette 6'5 Pepperdine (31.5m, 14.7p, 3.2r, 2.4a, 41.5% 3pt)
Youngblood 6'4 USF *out till Jan* (30m, 15.3p, 2.5r, 2.1a, 41.6% 3pt)

Reid (6'8 5* FR)
Cunningham (6'7 4* FR)

Nelson 6'11 (25.6m, 11.9p, 5.9r, 1.6b, 27.3% 3pt)
Stephenson 6'11 (16.6m, 5.3p, 2.7r, 31.7% 3pt)

Omoruyi 6'11 Rutgers (26.9m, 10.7p, 8.3r, 2.9b)
Sherrill (6'10 5* FR)
Crazy good? No!!!

KENTUCKY
Butler 6'2 SD St (27.6m, 9.3p, 2.6r, 3.0a, 1.5s, 30.2% 3pt)
Kriisa 6'3 WV (33.5m, 11p, 2.5r, 4.7a, 42.4% 3pt)
Perry (6'1 4* FR)

Oweh 6'4 Okl (24.8m, 11.4p, 3.8r, 37.7% 3pt)
Brea 6'7 Dayton (29.1m, 11.1p, 3.8r, 49.8% 3pt)

Robinson 6'6 BYU (26.5m, 14.2p, 2.5r, 35.4% 3pt)
Chandler (6'5 4* FR)
Noah (6'5 FR)

Carr 6'11 WF (32.5m, 13.5p, 6.8r, 1.5b, 37.1% 3pt)
Almonor 6'7 FDU (32m, 16.4p, 5.1r, 39.4% 3pt)

Williams 7'0 Drexel (22.9m, 12.2p, 7.8r, 1.9a, 1.8b)
Garrison 6'10 Ok St (22.6m, 7.5p, 5.3r, 1.5a, 1.5b)

How do they compare???
PG- Sears is an AA, you can't beat that. But Butler and Kriisa are both good. Butler started for a F4 team and is an elite defender. Kriisa is a very good offensive player, with number that would match Sears except for the volume that Sears had. Holloway is NOT as good as either Sears or Kriisa. Each team has a FR 4* that if makes the court could contribute. I'd give the 3 Bama players (out of 10) an 8, 4, 3 ratings. And the 3 UK players 6.5, 6.5 & 3 ratings. Edge BAMA

SG
- Bama has 3 very solid guys there once the one returns from injury in Jan, at which time they may play 2 together. The 2 transfers both came from mid-majors, so I wouldn't be shocked if 1 of them didn't meet expectations. But all 3 are good 3pt shooters. UK though has the top returning 3pt shooter in the country (Brea) although he also was a (high)-mid-major guy. Oweh compliments him with defense, while a solid 3pt shooter himself, and played in the best conference the past 2 years. I'd give the 2 healthy Bama guys 6.0 ratings and the injured one a 5 (would also be a 6 if not hurt), and I'd give Brea a 6.5 and Oweh a 6.0. I call it EVEN.

SF- Once Youngblood is healthy Bama may go with 2 SG, but until then they have 2 FR at SF. But one is a top 10 5* guy. However FR are always a mystery, so I'll rate these two as 5 & 4. UK has Robinson, the top scorer on a top 25 team in the top conference last year. Although his shooting %'s are just ok. Chandler is a mature 4*, while Noah is a future guy. I'll rate UK guys 7, 3.5, 2. Edge to UK

PF-
This is half of Bama's returning players. Good size here too (both 6'10-11). Nelson had a very good NCAA-T, but on the season was just OK. Only made 27% of his 3's and <6 rpg. Stephenson didn't shoot much better (31% from 3) but was a better rebounder (I liked his game). I'll give these 2 ratings of 6 and 5.5. UK brings in Carr, also 6'10-11, and played an ACC, but shot it much better (10% better than Nelson). Almonor did come from a mid-major, and while has the thickness to make up for it, is just 6'7. But he is maybe even a better shooter than Carr. So UK gets ratings of 6.5 and 5.5 here. Slight edge to UK.

C
- Both teams went for defense / shot blocking here. Bama got the P5 player (Omoruyi), who is the better shot blocker, but has less offense. While for UK Williams is a slightly better scorer and rebounder, and was defensive POY in his mid-major conf. Backing them up Bama has a 6'10 FR, while UK adds a 6'10 from another P5 school. He didn't score that well, but otherwise looks decent. Bama gets a 6.5 and a 4, while UK gets a 6 and a 5. I call it EVEN.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: G-PIP

Padsfs07

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2013
3,504
3,174
108
PF- This is half of Bama's returning players. Good size here too (both 6'10-11). Nelson had a very good NCAA-T, but on the season was just OK. Only made 27% of his 3's and <6 rpg. Stephenson didn't shoot much better (31% from 3) but was a better rebounder (I liked his game). I'll give these 2 ratings of 6 and 5.5. UK brings in Carr, also 6'10-11, and played an ACC, but shot it much better (10% better than Nelson). Almonor did come from a mid-major, and while has the thickness to make up for it, is just 6'7. But he is maybe even a better shooter than Carr. So UK gets ratings of 6.5 and 5.5 here. Slight edge to UK.

C
- Both teams went for defense / shot blocking here. Bama got the P5 player (Omoruyi), who is the better shot blocker, but has less offense. While for UK Williams is a slightly better scorer and rebounder, and was defensive POY in his mid-major conf. Backing them up Bama has a 6'10 FR, while UK adds a 6'10 from another P5 school. He didn't score that well, but otherwise looks decent. Bama gets a 6.5 and a 3, while UK gets a 6 and a 5. I call it EVEN.

I don't know how you can call these even or edge to UK. For one, Nelson, Stevenson, and Reid are a really good trio for the SF/PF spot. Reid is a top 10 freshmen. Stevenson and Nelson both came on strong at the end of the year as well.

Then at C, Omoruyi was one of the top center transfers, coming from Rutgers, and they have a top 25 freshmen in Sherrell. At best, I'd call that a slight edge to Bama.
 
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
I don't know how you can call these even or edge to UK. For one, Nelson, Stevenson, and Reid are a really good trio for the SF/PF spot. Reid is a top 10 freshmen. Stevenson and Nelson both came on strong at the end of the year as well.

Then at C, Omoruyi was one of the top center transfers, coming from Rutgers, and they have a top 25 freshmen in Sherrell. At best, I'd call that a slight edge to Bama.
I gave my rationale. You can agree or disagree.

I said I liked Stevenson's game. But BOTH him and Nelson are NOT good shooters (27% & 31% from 3), yet they both like to play on the outside. While Carr and Almonor made 37% & 39% from 3. Granted, I expect Almonor % to go down (like Nelson's did) going from mid-major defenders to P5 defenders, so even if Almonor drops 10%, Carr is still a much better shooter than either Bama guy. Nelson just looks awkward in everything he does on the floor. And the site I used (an Alabama site) had Reid at the 3, maybe because Youngblood is hurt and also because with Nelson and Stephenson that doesn't leave any minutes at the 4 for Reid. So I have Reid going against Robinson.

I liked and wanted Omoruyi. Williams was also one of the top C transfers, just slightly below Omoruyi. H2H, I give the slight edge to Omoruyi. But that's just 2/3 of the game. The other 1/3 is Garrison, who has a year of P5 under his belt and was a 5*, vs the thin (200 lb) FR. I do see now that Sherrill was also a 5* (the Bama site I used for reference gave the * status of the F's but not him so I assumed 3*, my bad) So I'll slightly upgrade him, but he is only 200-lbs so Garrison is much more ready and likely better, offsetting Omoruyi being a little better than Williams.

Overall, maybe Sears is enough better, or Youngblood returns sooner, that Alabama is better. But "Crazy good", No.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyeric

G-PIP

All-American
Mar 14, 2014
5,286
5,964
0
I agree with this.

Lets compare Alabama to UK. Returnees bolded.

ALABAMA
Sears 6'1 (33.6m, 21.5p, 4.2r, 4.0a, 1.6s, 43.6% 3pt)
Holloway 6'1 Auburn (20.2m, 7.3p, 2.7a, 30.2 3pt, 31.8% fg)
Philon (6'4 4* FR)

Wrightsell 6'3 (23.7m, 8.9p, 3.0r, 44.7% 3pt)
Mallette 6'5 Pepperdine (31.5m, 14.7p, 3.2r, 2.4a, 41.5% 3pt)
Youngblood 6'4 USF *out till Jan* (30m, 15.3p, 2.5r, 2.1a, 41.6% 3pt)

Reid (6'8 5* FR)
Cunningham (6'7 4* FR)

Nelson 6'11 (25.6m, 11.9p, 5.9r, 1.6b, 27.3% 3pt)
Stephenson 6'11 (16.6m, 5.3p, 2.7r, 31.7% 3pt)

Omoruyi 6'11 Rutgers (26.9m, 10.7p, 8.3r, 2.9b)
Sherrell (6'10 FR)
Crazy good? No!!!

KENTUCKY
Butler 6'2 SD St (27.6m, 9.3p, 2.6r, 3.0a, 1.5s, 30.2% 3pt)
Kriisa 6'3 WV (33.5m, 11p, 2.5r, 4.7a, 42.4% 3pt)
Perry (6'1 4* FR)

Oweh 6'4 Okl (24.8m, 11.4p, 3.8r, 37.7% 3pt)
Brea 6'7 Dayton (29.1m, 11.1p, 3.8r, 49.8% 3pt)

Robinson 6'6 BYU (26.5m, 14.2p, 2.5r, 35.4% 3pt)
Chandler (6'5 4* FR)
Noah (6'5 FR)

Carr 6'11 WF (32.5m, 13.5p, 6.8r, 1.5b, 37.1% 3pt)
Almonor 6'7 FDU (32m, 16.4p, 5.1r, 39.4% 3pt)

Williams 7'0 Drexel (22.9m, 12.2p, 7.8r, 1.9a, 1.8b)
Garrison 6'10 Ok St (22.6m, 7.5p, 5.3r, 1.5a, 1.5b)

How do they compare???
PG- Sears is an AA, you can't beat that. But Butler and Kriisa are both good. Butler started for a F4 team and is an elite defender. Kriisa is a very good offensive player, with number that would match Sears except for the volume that Sears had. Holloway is NOT as good as either Sears or Kriisa. Each team has a FR 4* that if makes the court could contribute. I'd give the 3 Bama players (out of 10) an 8, 4, 3 ratings. And the 3 UK players 6.5, 6.5 & 3 ratings. Edge BAMA

SG
- Bama has 3 very solid guys there once the one returns from injury in Jan, at which time they may play 2 together. The 2 transfers both came from mid-majors, so I wouldn't be shocked if 1 of them didn't meet expectations. But all 3 are good 3pt shooters. UK though has the top returning 3pt shooter in the country (Brea) although he also was a (high)-mid-major guy. Oweh compliments him with defense, while a solid 3pt shooter himself, and played in the best conference the past 2 years. I'd give the 2 healthy Bama guys 6.0 ratings and the injured one a 5 (would also be a 6 if not hurt), and I'd give Brea a 6.5 and Oweh a 6.0. I call it EVEN.

SF- Once Youngblood is healthy Bama may go with 2 SG, but until then they have 2 FR at SF. But one is a top 10 5* guy. However FR are always a mystery, so I'll rate these 2 as 5 & 3. UK has Robinson, the top scorer on a top 25 team in the top conference last year. Although his shooting %'s are just ok. Chandler is a mature 4*, while Noah is a future guy. I'll rate UK guys 7, 3.5, 2. Edge to UK

PF-
This is half of Bama's returning players. Good size here too (both 6'10-11). Nelson had a very good NCAA-T, but on the season was just OK. Only made 27% of his 3's and <6 rpg. Stephenson didn't shoot much better (31% from 3) but was a better rebounder (I liked his game). I'll give these 2 ratings of 6 and 5.5. UK brings in Carr, also 6'10-11, and played an ACC, but shot it much better (10% better than Nelson). Almonor did come from a mid-major, and while has the thickness to make up for it, is just 6'7. But he is maybe even a better shooter than Carr. So UK gets ratings of 6.5 and 5.5 here. Slight edge to UK.

C
- Both teams went for defense / shot blocking here. Bama got the P5 player (Omoruyi), who is the better shot blocker, but has less offense. While for UK Williams is a slightly better scorer and rebounder, and was defensive POY in his mid-major conf. Backing them up Bama has a 6'10 FR, while UK adds a 6'10 from another P5 school. He didn't score that well, but otherwise looks decent. Bama gets a 6.5 and a 3, while UK gets a 6 and a 5. I call it EVEN.
Appreciate the numbers compilation and work put into the post. Enjoyed reading it.