Non Conferrnce Scheduling

PryorFan

New member
Dec 26, 2004
3,364
0
0
Strong non conference scheduling and conference championships (like OU's if they win Saturday) mean nothing if the committee were to put Michigan into playoffs over a conference champion with the same losses. Michigan lost to Iowa and TOSU. SOONERS lost to TOSU and Houston who is as good as Iowa. IMHO
 
  • Like
Reactions: splook18

PtLavacaSooner

New member
Oct 2, 2013
4,385
0
0
Strong non conference scheduling and conference championships (like OU's if they win Saturday) mean nothing if the committee were to put Michigan into playoffs over a conference champion with the same losses. Michigan lost to Iowa and TOSU. SOONERS lost to TOSU and Houston who is as good as Iowa. IMHO
Michigan lost in OT on the road, and by a last second FG on the road.
OU lost by double digits...
 
May 29, 2001
58,982
17
0
I say forget about scheduling one tough, one average and one lighweight in the non-conference schedule. Select three middle-of-the-pack teams like Kentucky, Colorado State and Northern Illinois and be done with it. Unfortuantely, it doesn't make for very compelling games for the fans or for TV. So, I guess it will never work.
 

aix_xpert

New member
Sep 5, 2001
14,568
16,573
0
This as much as anything is why I'm for the expansion to 8 teams and the auto-bids for the five conferences. That way you encourage teams to play good non-conference schedules to serve as an alternative path to earn a playoff spot beyond the conference title. Otherwise, a team is much better suited to play a couple of D1 'meh' teams each year than to schedule other bona-fide opponents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: splook18

OklaBama

Member
Aug 10, 2004
8,724
9
27
This as much as anything is why I'm for the expansion to 8 teams and the auto-bids for the five conferences. That way you encourage teams to play good non-conference schedules to serve as an alternative path to earn a playoff spot beyond the conference title. Otherwise, a team is much better suited to play a couple of D1 'meh' teams each year than to schedule other bona-fide opponents.

1971.....#1 Nebraska, #2 Oklahoma, #3 Colorado. All from the Big 8 Conference. It can happen again. The four best teams should be in the playoffs and no team should be automatically entitled to a playoff slot simply because it won its conference. But that's just my opinion.
 

PSUwolf

Active member
Nov 11, 2014
2,274
314
83
Strong non conference scheduling and conference championships (like OU's if they win Saturday) mean nothing if the committee were to put Michigan into playoffs over a conference champion with the same losses. Michigan lost to Iowa and TOSU. SOONERS lost to TOSU and Houston who is as good as Iowa. IMHO

The other point is that not only did Michigan lose twice, but both losses were at the end of the season which usually spells disaster for a playoff spot. Sandwiched in between the Iowa and OSU loss was a tough game with Indiana whereas Oklahoma continually got better as the season went on. Yeah, I don't get it either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoleGa_rivals170091

OklaBama

Member
Aug 10, 2004
8,724
9
27
The other point is that not only did Michigan lose twice, but both losses were at the end of the season which usually spells disaster for a playoff spot.

Yes, this is a valid point. I know others feel early season losses are the kiss of death especially for teams on the bubble, but it is much more common that losing late in the season hurts more. Wasn't Penn State 2-2 early this season yet they are still in it. Same goes for Heisman consideration. With a good game today Dede will remain a contender. A bad day, he will be out. What have you done for me lately syndrome.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: TAVlonghorn

anon_5z68cgtvj4ggn

New member
Aug 1, 2001
0
0
0
Herbstreit this morning referenced this in regards to the playoff and Washington. He said that if Washington gets in with a nonconference strength of schedule in the 120's it will send the message to play a weak non conference schedule, win your conference championship, and get in the playoff. OU played the 7th ranked non conference schedule and they've never recovered. What's the point in doing that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob Lewis_rivals

dtrain87

New member
Oct 5, 2016
158
0
0
The other point is that not only did Michigan lose twice, but both losses were at the end of the season which usually spells disaster for a playoff spot. Sandwiched in between the Iowa and OSU loss was a tough game with Indiana whereas Oklahoma continually got better as the season went on. Yeah, I don't get it either.
Michigan is not gonna be in the CFP.