What Fitz should say and what he will say are two different things.We all know how secretive Fitz is.He can teach the CIA a thing or two about keeping secrets.I hope behind the sceenes there is an open competition going on.A real competition.The only guy on the roster I would think can beat out CK is Olsen.If the coaches are waiting to save his shirt Or feel that there is not much of a difference I don’t know.I just say put the one out on the field that gives us the best chance to win.And if we don’t have an upgrade then hit the portal and have them ready for next season.Missing makeable FG’s is unacceptable.
This is true, but, in this context, I'll believe it when I see someone else kicking. Coaches are weird about a couple of positions, they act like they'll get COVID if another QB or Kicker sees meaningful action. Every other position has "competitive depth" but the kickers and QB sit and sit and sit until their participation in meaningless garbage time, if at all. RB fumbles - go to the doghouse and stay there. Kicker misses multiple opportunities...crickets. Meaning - the 2nd stringer will have zero game experience next year, presuming Charlie isn't granted yet another year. /s
Weird thing to me - other than Fitz's unhealthy obsession with "the seniors! the seniors!", I don't get this attachment. The reason he goes for it on 4th down so often is that he doesn't have confidence in Charlie.
He is 1-5 vs P5 competition. Try someone else. What could happen, a missed FG? Hunter is a senior, and he got benched. It's like he just doesn't care about FG's and only does them in the 25-40 range if no other real option.
I guess it's pointless (pun intended) to debate it. Fitz gonna Fitz, and we can take it and say "thank you, sir, may I have another?"