OSU in talks to join the SEC, replace Vanderbilt?

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
I’ve got a buddy who lives near Columbus and is naturally an OSU fan. He said he’s heard that OSU is in “double secret” discussions with SEC leadership about joining their ranks. This would allow them to keep their annual rivalry game with Michigan and also create a true super conference with the addition of UT and OU.

Vanderbilt hasn’t been truly competitive for decades, so if they want to keep it as a nice round number (16 including UT and OK), well they would be the logical team “to be replaced”.

No word yet on if Clemson is interested in leaving the ACC for the SEC, but that’s where my imagination continued. In the NIL age, this is a logical outcome to be expected. If this is true and my buddy’s right, at least the B1G will be competitive again.
 

kaTNap

Sophomore
Nov 6, 2005
2,554
131
63
I’ve got a buddy who lives near Columbus and is naturally an OSU fan. He said he’s heard that OSU is in “double secret” discussions with SEC leadership about joining their ranks. This would allow them to keep their annual rivalry game with Michigan and also create a true super conference with the addition of UT and OU.

Vanderbilt hasn’t been truly competitive for decades, so if they want to keep it as a nice round number (16 including UT and OK), well they would be the logical team “to be replaced”.

No word yet on if Clemson is interested in leaving the ACC for the SEC, but that’s where my imagination continued. In the NIL age, this is a logical outcome to be expected. If this is true and my buddy’s right, at least the B1G will be competitive again.
Maybe a three-way trade? OSU to the SEC, Vandy to the ACC, Virginia to the B1G?
 

Alaskawildkat

Senior
Dec 28, 2005
20,763
496
83
Why would NIL be a factor? This directs money to individuals, not the schools.

Maybe because it could help recruiting by buying athletes that would otherwise go to an SEC school over OSU staying in the Big Ten?
 

kaTNap

Sophomore
Nov 6, 2005
2,554
131
63
I like where your head’s at. But how does the ACC benefit from adding Vandy?
Hypothetically: SEC wants to give Vandy a "soft landing", so they offer the ACC a contractual agreement not to poach schools from them plus a presence in the Nashville market.
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
Why would NIL be a factor? This directs money to individuals, not the schools.

Maybe because it could help recruiting by buying athletes that would otherwise go to an SEC school over OSU staying in the Big Ten?
Because this new conference - the SEC with Oklahoma, OSU, and Texas - would consolidate all of the largest, most passionate fanbases.

And therefore would print cash. Lots of it. NIL has allowed us to drop the facade that college football players get their fair share, or that it’s not an unpaid amateur league for the NFL. This new conference could basically determine its own national champion and keep most of the money to itself.

Did you see the news about the Alabama recruit that’s already got $1M in endorsements? Do you not agree that the best OSU quarterback recruits will want the same deals?
 

NU Houston

Junior
Apr 12, 2010
6,307
229
63
He’s an honorable guy. I’m pretty sure he was a Boy Scout. But all of this info is off the record, on the QT, and very hush-hush - so I understand why you feel that way.
Very hush-hush, which is why he shared it with you and you posted it on a public message board.
 

rmndcat

Junior
Sep 4, 2009
2,781
221
63
He’s an honorable guy. I’m pretty sure he was a Boy Scout. But all of this info is off the record, on the QT, and very hush-hush - so I understand why you feel that way.
The last guy who talked that way didn't meet a good end.
 
Aug 31, 2001
23,343
332
0
I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility that the major school powers will start conspiring with each other (mostly out of fear of being left out) to create some sort of power alliance to keep themselves above the fray. If fellow conference mates get left out, they won’t care as long as their own butt is saved. I’m so very curious to see how this will all play out.
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
Very hush-hush, which is why he shared it with you and you posted it on a public message board.
Well I think I was told for a reason. I figured I would share it with all of my favorite internet friends to help them grease the wheels.
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility that the major school powers will start conspiring with each other (mostly out of fear of being left out) to create some sort of power alliance to keep themselves above the fray. If fellow conference mates get left out, they won’t care as long as their own butt is saved. I’m so very curious to see how this will all play out.
Finally!! Somebody gets it. Thanks @VirginiaWildcat.

If the Big Ten replaces OSU with Virginia per @kaTNap ‘s idea, we’ll be fine. If it’s a Temple or Vanderbilt, then we’re probably in trouble.
 
Aug 31, 2001
23,343
332
0
Finally!! Somebody gets it. Thanks @VirginiaWildcat.

If the Big Ten replaces OSU with Virginia per @kaTNap ‘s idea, we’ll be fine. If it’s a Temple or Vanderbilt, then we’re probably in trouble.

I don’t see a UVA/OSU trade quite as favorably as you so. UVA doesn’t actually carry nearly the weight one would think from their bball success. 80% of the fans in this state are VT fans. VT fans are like OSU fans…loud and obnoxious. But they are everywhere! UVA is viewed as a elitist snobbish school, and Virginia (save the Fairfax area) doesn’t generally house those kinds of people.
 

zeek55

Sophomore
Nov 21, 2010
3,583
132
0
The Big Ten will add schools not lose schools.

We have the biggest TV contract right now (soon 2nd after SEC if they grab Texas/OU).

The ACC contract is horrendous. It pays *less* than the Big 12 contract that Texas wants to leave, and those schools are locked in through 2036.

We should just blow up the ACC in 5-10 years and add schools like UNC/UVa/Va Tech/FSU/Clemson/etc. whoever Big Ten decides on...
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
The Big Ten will add schools not lose schools.

We have the biggest TV contract right now (soon 2nd after SEC if they grab Texas/OU).

The ACC contract is horrendous. It pays *less* than the Big 12 contract that Texas wants to leave, and those schools are locked in through 2036.

We should just blow up the ACC in 5-10 years and add schools like UNC/UVa/Va Tech/FSU/Clemson/etc. whoever Big Ten decides on...
Sorry to break the news to you but this “rumor” is gaining traction on the OSU free board.

I’d invite @EvanstonCat to comment over there but I think he’s been unjustly banned.
 
Aug 31, 2003
14,711
235
63
Why? The players deserve to be paid fair market value. The NIL and conference moves like this help ensure that. Do you work for free?
The players are supposed to be student-athletes. I would have gladly paid football in exchange for tuition, books, room, board, and stipend. How much is that package worth per year?
 
Aug 31, 2001
23,343
332
0
The players are supposed to be student-athletes. I would have gladly paid football in exchange for tuition, books, room, board, and stipend. How much is that package worth per year?

Glades said it added up to about $50 an hour. Plus all the perks they get.

Anyway, there’s no going back now, as horrible as it is. It’ll be somewhat amusing to watch as fans who advocated for this suddenly realize what the consequences will be.
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
The players are supposed to be student-athletes. I would have gladly paid football in exchange for tuition, books, room, board, and stipend. How much is that package worth per year?
Less than their fair market value. The NIL will take care of that for the most part.
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
What's the fair market wage for our lacrosse players?

Or hell, the women's basketball team?
If I’m being honest? A bit more for our women’s basketball players than our lacrosse team - but not much in financial terms.

How many people watch or attend their games? Or more importantly spend money to support them?
 
Sep 6, 2001
2,322
21
0
Careful, socialist.
Me, socialist ??? Are you kidding. I'm about as far from a socialist as you can get.

But this issue has nothing at all to do with socialism. It's about collegiate amateurism vs professionalism. As that line continues to get blurred, or even eliminated, as is currently trending, fans will ultimately regret the tremendous changes that will happen to the sport on the field.
 
Aug 31, 2003
14,711
235
63
If I’m being honest? A bit more for our women’s basketball players than our lacrosse team - but not much in financial terms.

How many people watch or attend their games? Or more importantly spend money to support them?
Should we pay them their market value?
 

CatManTrue

All-American
Oct 4, 2008
15,805
5,249
97
Me, socialist ??? Are you kidding. I'm about as far from a socialist as you can get.

But this issue has nothing at all to do with socialism. It's about collegiate amateurism vs professionalism. As that line continues to get blurred, or even eliminated, as is currently trending, fans will ultimately regret the tremendous changes that will happen to the sport on the field.
Why? Do you really think NCAA football is about the betterment of all its athletes? If so, I have a bridge that’s for sale near Long Island. PM me for details and a price.