Since UK & AR didn't play, don't know who gets the higher seed if they tie. If UK loses both & AR loses one, they tie. What's that tie breaker? Results vs. common SEC opponents?
But, if UK wins both or they go 1-1 while LSU goes 1-1, UK is SEC champ since they beat LSU 2/3. I.e., UK wins that tie break.
Okay... I think these are the scenarios:
1. For LSU to win the SEC:
a. LSU has to win their two games against Miss. State AND
b. Kentucky and Florida have to split their final two games.
2. For UK to win the SEC:
a. Sweep Florida OR
b. Beat Florida in one of the two remaining AND
c. LSU lose to MSU in one of the two remaining or both.
3. For Florida to win the SEC:
a. Beat UK in both the next two games.
Arkansas is on the outside looking in. The best that they can do, if I am not mistaken, is finish 2nd in the SEC. To do this they need to win their final two games and they need either someone in the UK/UF series to win their final two as well as MSU to win their final two. If these 4 teams split their series then you'd have UK, UF, and LSU tied for the league record of 20-10 (and they'd finish in that order due to tiebreaker) then Arkansas can finish no better than 4th in the conference. However, if you have one team win the next two games of both the UK/UF and MSU/LSU series then you have something like this:
1. UK - 21-9
2. Arkansas - 19-10
3. Miss State - 19-11
4. Florida - 19-11
The script is flipped if UK loses the last two to Florida. Then UK is 4th in the SEC because they lose the tiebreaker to Miss State. Still, we can't do any worse than 4th. The other scenario is this:
1. UK/UF - 21-9
2. LSU - 21-9
3. Arkansas - 19-10
4. UK/UF - 19-11
I think that covers all my bases. lol