END OF GAME
In conclusion, was the defensive rebounding the result of effort? I can confidently say it absolutely was NOT the primary reason. No level of effort is going to be literally perfect in a college basketball game, so I’m not stating that our effort was anywhere near mythical proportions.
I’m sure many of you will not like to hear this:
- A heavy chunk of the offensive rebounds were a result of how the ball bounced. Sometimes that happens. You make a great block and it lands in the wrong hands for a layup. A hard rim collision causes a ball to launch all the way back to a guard thirty feet from the hoop. Want to say it’s cope? I gave you the timestamps…
- Caleb Wilson had too much of an athleticism, quickness and vertical advantage over Jelavic and Williams. This one pains me to say, because this is something that’s not (in my opinion) fixable. I think until those guys develop, we will struggle against elite rebounding power forwards. That, or Dioubate returns.
- Switching ball screens and in transition has allowed us to patch up some areas of defense that were extremely porous early on. However, a downside to switching is rebounding advantages begin to take shape. This happened on several possessions in this game.
Shout out to Moreno. In my live watch of the game, I thought Moreno was giving up boards. Rewatching —- I was wrong! I didn’t find anything other than the one bad possession with Moreno grabbing defensive rebounds —- he more than held up against elite frontcourt players. We are very lucky to have him in our program.
As far as rebounding is concerned, the effort was absolutely there. There is the one possession that I’m sure Moreno and Co. would love to have back that resulted in three Caleb Wilson shot attempts in one play. That one is the only clear effort play from my vantage point. Go Cats!