POLL: Should the Seniors start the game on Senior Day?

KA4Prez_rivals78700

All-American
Dec 8, 2003
140,541
5,314
0
Yeah, along with WCS and Towns. Instruct Towns to tip the opening tip out of bounds or one of those Seniors foul a UF player right away.
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Originally posted by KA4Prez:
Yeah, along with WCS and Towns. Instruct Towns to tip the opening tip out of bounds or one of those Seniors foul a UF player right away.
I prefer the latter...stupid to win the tip and then give it away if you ask me. Just IMO.

Of course, I also think it is a waste of time and stupid to go through what you suggested just to start 3 walk-ons but I'm clearly in the minority on this one so I'm going to let it rest and just see what Cal does.
 

FltDoc

All-Conference
Jan 4, 2003
1,993
1,851
0
A great tradition... let them play until UK goes down by 4, OR...., until 3 min. is reached...whichever comes first...

Go CATS!
 

KA4Prez_rivals78700

All-American
Dec 8, 2003
140,541
5,314
0
Originally posted by FltDoc:
A great tradition... let them play until UK goes down by 4, OR...., until 3 min. is reached...whichever comes first...

Go CATS!
Is it a tradition under Cal? Either way, it's not a bad decision regardless. They are walk-ons.
 
Mar 24, 2013
1,093
72
0
Close poll. Yes they should start. I'm not saying they put in AS much time and effort into the team as the rotation players, but they have put a lot of time into the team over their four years. Give them their moment.
 

Saguaro Cat

All-American
Apr 27, 2008
16,270
6,854
113
Originally posted by FltDoc:
A great tradition... let them play until UK goes down by 4, OR...., until 3 min. is reached...whichever comes first...

Go CATS!
There is no tradition to start senior walk ons on senior day. Joe B Hall, Eddie Sutton, Rick Pitino, and now Cal have all sat walk ons on senior day. They might get to play if the game was out of hand, but that's the only reason senior walk ons play on senior day.

AGAIN, WALK ONS STARTING ON SENIOR DAY HAS NEVER BEEN A TRADITION!



This post was edited on 3/5 10:39 PM by SaguaroCat
 

KWilt43atbuzz

All-American
Nov 18, 2012
17,050
6,848
0
Originally posted by Samwise Ganjee:
Clutter[/B]
Good Lord Sam.. What isn't clutter to you? You have become the official Clutter Cop of the board. But I do love it!
 

throatpoker

All-Conference
Apr 9, 2009
63,107
2,398
0
Yes, if we can't beat fl with a 10 point spot then we don't deserve to remain undefeated
 
May 22, 2002
18,339
15,736
113
I vote NO! Work them individually into the game at some point late in the second half, or put them all in if UK is up by 20 or more at the end. Get them in the stat sheet, sure! But start? No way!
 

KingOfBBN

Heisman
Sep 14, 2013
39,077
38,403
0
Do you guys remember the starting line-up for Senior Day in 2006 against Florida? I think it was Brandon Stockton, Preston Lemaster, Ravi Moss, Orbzut, and Patrick Sparks.

Yes.

That was where we were nine years ago. Oh, and I am absolutely against a walk-on getting to start on senior day. Those guys even being on the roster is already a favor because of their folks knowing Cal. No need to get in an early hole.
 

SLONER67

Redshirt
Dec 18, 2014
428
3
0
I'm OK with it so long as it isn't more than 60 to 90 seconds and we have 2 of our regular starters in with them OR we could do something for them during the half time show and hold out the possibility of them playing the last 60 to 90 seconds if we are ahead by 25 to 30 points.
 

KMKAT

All-Conference
Sep 17, 2003
94,717
2,942
0
Sure, start the seniors for their moment, have someone foul early in the possession, then let the big boys play.

Win win for everyone.
 

kentuckyrld

Senior
Mar 30, 2007
11,745
864
0
I have never understood why you would do anything in a big game other than try your best to win. Starting three walk on players would be silly. UK needs to stifle UF right out of the gate and not having some of the regular 9 or 10 players in the game would be just asking for trouble. Run uf out of the gym and give the walk ons some time at the end. that is all that need be done.
 

TR21Bassin

Redshirt
Jan 10, 2006
362
0
0
Yes. Run them through the first offensive series and then have one foul Florida to stop the clock and make the subs.

These kids have earned the right to start on Senior Day.
 

LewisCoBearCat

Redshirt
Nov 20, 2011
129
16
0
Let the players decide. Should be a team decision. The seniors may not want to jeopardize the teams chance to lose the last regular game of the season. There would be a lot of pressure on them not to put us in a hole to start our last home game. Players decision.
 

kitkoodle

Freshman
Mar 18, 2007
11,440
59
0
yes lets not give these seniors who are walkons no respect at all, 2 mins isnt going to kill us, its not like asking to play them the last two mins of a very close game. Stop acting as if we are UofL, UNC, Kansas, and its win at all cost, no matter the player..but also remember, Coach Cal says it is all about the players
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Originally posted by kitkoodle:
yes lets not give these seniors who are walkons no respect at all, 2 mins isnt going to kill us, its not like asking to play them the last two mins of a very close game. Stop acting as if we are UofL, UNC, Kansas, and its win at all cost, no matter the player..but also remember, Coach Cal says it is all about the players
It is about the players...the players that are going to win UK a national title. The players that are all probably playing their last game in Rupp in Harrison, Harrison, Lyles, Towns and WCS.

And just a stupid sentence you threw in there that has no correlation to this debate btw. What does not starting 3 walk on guys have to do with the things those programs are doing? Seems apples to oranges to me.
 

spotter34

All-American
Dec 31, 2002
19,167
8,293
113
If they were scholarship players then start them on senior day but walk-ons? absolutely not. Cal has started Perry Stevenson, Ramon Harris, Josh Harrelson, Eloy Vargas, Julius Mays, and any other senior SCHOLARSHIP player he's had, but he's under no obligation to do the same with walk-ons.
 

IamnotRalph

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2001
1,202
9
0
Look, none of these guys are legitimate D1 basketball players. UK and Coach Cal clearly did them a favor and gave them a wonderful opportunity by allowing them to play and practice with UK. So now we're debating whether or not to grant them another favor by allowing them to actually start a basketball game, pretending they are D1 athletes.

Look, I'm happy for all three of them. They are Wildcats in their heart and in the hearts of UK fans. But, the UK basketball program has given them NCAA championship rings, friendships with NBA stars, wonderful travel opportunities, and much, much more...and received these things despite, from a purely basketball athletics standpoint, not being qualified to receive them. They've already hit the lottery, why should they expect more, and why do some feel the obligation to give them more?

So, no. They don't need to start. We don't owe it to them.

In two years, if Dominique and Derek are still here and still the 11th & 12th men, then yes, they start. They actually sacrificed quite a bit to "play" at UK, are legitimate D1 athletes, and would be deserving of receiving the honor of starting a basketball game for the University of Kentucky Wildcats....and as fans, we would owe them our appreciation for their support and sacrifice.
 

John Frusciante

Redshirt
Sep 17, 2005
7,669
0
0
Originally posted by IamnotRalph:
Look, none of these guys are legitimate D1 basketball players. UK and Coach Cal clearly did them a favor and gave them a wonderful opportunity by allowing them to play and practice with UK. So now we're debating whether or not to grant them another favor by allowing them to actually start a basketball game, pretending they are D1 athletes.

Look, I'm happy for all three of them. They are Wildcats in their heart and in the hearts of UK fans. But, the UK basketball program has given them NCAA championship rings, friendships with NBA stars, wonderful travel opportunities, and much, much more...and received these things despite, from a purely basketball athletics standpoint, not being qualified to receive them. They've already hit the lottery, why should they expect more, and why do some feel the obligation to give them more?

So, no. They don't need to start. We don't owe it to them.

In two years, if Dominique and Derek are still here and still the 11th & 12th men, then yes, they start. They actually sacrificed quite a bit to "play" at UK, are legitimate D1 athletes, and would be deserving of receiving the honor of starting a basketball game for the University of Kentucky Wildcats....and as fans, we would owe them our appreciation for their support and sacrifice.
I agree with this take, although I wouldn't have a problem if Cal chose otherwise.
 
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
Originally posted by TruBluCatFan:
Scholarship seniors yes. Walkons who never play no.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I agree. Seniors on scholarship OR walkons like Ravi Moss who were contributors. I'd say no to starting guys who would lose a pickup game at the YMCA and are on the team because their parents know Cal.