Honestly I think anyone can be forgiven for not being enamored by the hire at first, and even for the first few months. We were striking out on guys that we thought would line up to be here. And while he was doing some solid coaching at BYU (Beating Kansas and holding it down in the Big12 as a Mormon School was impressive), he also sort of felt like a "legacy hire".. someone that almost felt like we were doing a favor for. Was he ready for this job? Could he handle the media and scruitny? Very fair questions when we were hoping to lure someone like Hurley away or grab Billy Donovan.
I remember this place was probably 95% against the hire. I liked it, but was cautious, because he was pretty unproven and he did lose opening round in the tournament. But I was very impressed what he was able to do in the Big12 with a roster that was clearly a step or two behind the rest of the teams in the B12.
However, I didn't think he'd be THIS good, THIS quick. No one did. I say it again, the case can be made that Kentucky wouldn't swap coaches with anyone. Uconn would probably say the same thing, and I don't blame them. But thats it. No one other school.. not UNC, Duke or Kansas is choosing their guy over Pope or Hurley (and even many others if we're talking about Hubert Davis).