There’s a good and simple reason for that …This guy sounds like an idiot.
What was the line?That was a delay of game by the defense and if he ever watched Pickett before he should understand him spiking the ball is just him being him.
Kicking the FG was shady. Didn't make any sense down 10 on the final play.
What’s the better play there? Take a knee? Go for a TD? I have no problem kicking a FG there, and either if the other options.That was a delay of game by the defense and if he ever watched Pickett before he should understand him spiking the ball is just him being him.
Kicking the FG was shady. Didn't make any sense down 10 on the final play.
Why kick a FG? I dont think I've ever seen that in that situation. With 14 second left and then you try an onside kick sure but on the final play...seems shady. Probably isn't but I see skepticism.What’s the better play there? Take a knee? Go for a TD? I have no problem kicking a FG there, and either if the other options.
Typical Michigan ManThis guy sounds like an idiot.
Why not kick a FG? I can’t really think of a reason not to kick it.Why kick a FG? I dont think I've ever seen that in that situation. With 14 second left and then you try an onside kick sure but on the final play...seems shady. Probably isn't but I see skepticism.
Because it's meaningless...it's not strategicWhy not kick a FG? I can’t really think of a reason not to kick it.
That's just bad coaching which maybe thats all the whole thing is.Why didn't Denver kick the field goal on 4th and 3 from the red zone? They went for it and gave the ball back with a minute left!
because the only way they could lose was having it blocked and run back. It was right move to go for it up 10Why didn't Denver kick the field goal on 4th and 3 from the red zone? They went for it and gave the ball back with a minute left!
I wouldn’t think twice about it if somebody didn’t bring up the spread. It’s nothing either way to me. Kick it, don’t kick it, run a play, take a knee… whatever. There is as much reason to kick it as there is to take any of the other options to me.Because it's meaningless...it's not strategic
Again I'm not mad...its just not normal
Because it's meaningless...it's not strategic
Again I'm not mad...its just not normal
What’s the better play there? Take a knee? Go for a TD? I have no problem kicking a FG there, and either if the other options.
They'd need another penalty if they recovered the onside kick but good scenarioI had no problem with the FG either. I'm curious if anyone knows what would happen in this scenario:
In the above scenario, if the Raiders can still run another offensive play, they still have a theoretical path to tying/winning by kicking that FG.
- The Raiders make the FG, but Denver commits a penalty (roughing the kicker or something else) on the play. Clock runs down to 0:00.
- In the NFL, a team can accept that penalty on a made FG and keep the points, and assess the yards on the kickoff. The game also can't end on an accepted defensive penalty. So that means the Raiders have a right to try an untimed onside kick (is that correct?).
- Let's say the Raiders recover it. Would they then be able to run one more offensive play, or not? Or would they need Denver to commit another penalty on the onside kick to get another play?
B
because the only way they could lose was having it blocked and run back. It was right move to go fo
interesting, Raiders have also could have scored with a minute and a half and done the same..theoretically......B
because the only way they could lose was having it blocked and run back. It was right move to go for it up 10
LOL, there's a reason for that...HE IS.This guy sounds like an idiot.
That’s very helpful, that idiots give themselves away.LOL, there's a reason for that...HE IS.![]()
It's really fun!I never feel sorry for anyone taking a loss gambling on sports, even in these situations. Never understood why people do it and shocked by the pervasiveness of it in our society.