Positives from Mizzou game

[fwm]

The offense looked good in the first half. Sellers was on target,
and threw some beautiful passes. Receivers Jacob and Rowe
matched Sellers excellence with their touchdown catches.

 

[18IsTheMan]

If you told me we would end up with -9 yards rushing, I would have assumed we would get plastered. So I guess it says something good that we kept it close?

 

[Jonesz2]

The offense looked good in the first half. Sellers was on target,
and threw some beautiful passes. Receivers Jacob and Rowe
matched Sellers excellence with their touchdown catches.

Sellers had two balls that should been picks

 

[kidrobinski]

Sellers had two balls that should been picks

And they had multiple runs leading to scores that should have been tackles for loss.

But they weren't.

 

[Skuddy]

We didn't have any turnovers.

 

[Jonesz2]

And they had multiple runs leading to scores that should have been tackles for loss.

But they weren't.

Yep. Terrible coaching. Terrible preparation

 

[HI Cock1]

300+ yards passing

 

[Jhstans86]

It’s hard to win with 14 penalties and -9 rushing yards. OL needs to improve quick

 

[Jonesz2]

It’s hard to win with 14 penalties and -9 rushing yards. OL needs to improve quick

Undisciplined. That’s coaching

 

[18IsTheMan]

Undisciplined. That’s coaching

A bunch of those were pre-snap weren't they? Throw in tackling and blocking woes.

It all points to bad coaching.

 

[KingWard]

And they had multiple runs leading to scores that should have been tackles for loss.

But they weren't.

Athletic inequality in most of those cases, it appeared to me.

 

[kidrobinski]

Athletic inequality in most of those cases, it appeared to me.

Could be; could be not. The point in that post you quoted was that the poster I had quoted was attempting to deflect any positivity regarding Sellers by stating two of his throws 'should have been' picks (one of which was due to being hit while throwing.) But, as I posted and contrasted, they weren't. That's football.

 

[KingWard]

Could be; could be not. The point in that post you quoted was that the poster I had quoted was attempting to deflect any positivity regarding Sellers by stating two of his throws 'should have been' picks (one of which was due to being hit while throwing.) But, as I posted and contrasted, they weren't. That's football.

My remark was without regard to Sellers whatsoever. I opined that the broken tackles had mostly to do with the superior athleticism of the tackle-breakers. It certainly looked that way.