I know many of the posters that have more information about recruiting than I do mention how important Capel and Scheyer (these 2 in particular) have been to recent recruiting success. It is often pointed out that they are the point guys on a particular recruit.
My question is what do you attribute that success to? As a biased fan I would say it's one hell of an institution to get to sell, but is it more about relatability? If so, is it more advantageous to have a younger staff because they may relate more to these kids?
It's probably an ignorant question, but I was just curious. Thanks.
My question is what do you attribute that success to? As a biased fan I would say it's one hell of an institution to get to sell, but is it more about relatability? If so, is it more advantageous to have a younger staff because they may relate more to these kids?
It's probably an ignorant question, but I was just curious. Thanks.