Toggle sidebar

sawchuck

C

CTOkie

New member
Sep 20, 2001
16,343
8,352
0
Of the transfer exits so far, Sawchuk is perhaps the best player to leave.
But with Barnes, Robinson, Tatum, Blaylock and Ott, Sawchuk is not a significant loss.
 
C

CTOkie

New member
Sep 20, 2001
16,343
8,352
0
Can’t the NCAA see that the NIL rule will only corrupt and diminish what was college football?
And will only make the richest teams richer.
 
S

Soonerborn1959

Member
Aug 16, 2009
4,073
2,896
25
CTOkie said:
Can’t the NCAA see that the NIL rule will only corrupt and diminish what was college football?
And will only make the richest teams richer.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately the NCAA is just a title now. They have no power today. The players now control college sports
 
P

Plainosooner_rivals54053

New member
Oct 20, 2002
38,097
11,530
0
I think Sawchuck wants to be the number one Saw. When we brought in the Cal guy in the portal, it seemed implied that he'd be number one, AND the things said implied that what we already had was substandard. I'm sorry he's leaving, but I'm not surprised. Sawchuck will have a hard time without a spring whereever he goes winning the starting job, unless it's a school that is RB poor. But anybody moving now will have that problem.

We have an RB room full of talented players. Each has some issues to overcome. Injury history. Ball security. Experience shortage. The cream will rise. The weak will transfer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom