Scathing Story of Harbaugh Rescinding Offer to Recruit

Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
it probably happens more often than people think...

I don't know the specifics of this story...but if I had to guess I would say that Harbaugh probably recruited a bunch of OL and perhaps more committed than he anticipated, and in his eyes they're all more talented than this kid...or they needed the scholarship for another position..

pretty crappy the way it went down...there is probably a better way to do it than just dropping a bomb like that on a kid on such short notice...but that is how the cookie crumbles sometimes...

everybody over recruits...you have to...you can't rely heavily on the word of a high school kid...because plenty of programs get left high and dry by commitments all the time...

the recruiting game needs to be overhauled...

it's too easy for kids to string programs and staffs along and use them for all the perks only to bounce at the 11th hour...and it's too easy for coaches to leave a kid high and dry...

all that is probably another topic and rant for another day...
 

trueblujr

Heisman
Dec 14, 2005
30,302
95,975
113
An early signing period would go a long way towards keeping kids from flipping. Anymore the hardest battle is keeping the commitments on board until signing day. I know this isn't an instance of that, but if there was an early signing period this kid might not have been in this position to begin with.
 

3kidsandme

Heisman
Jan 12, 2013
7,345
10,353
0
I have no issue if you give the kid time to get recruited. My issue is the 11th hour bull crap. The big programs lime things the way they are. Programs like UK prefer an early signing period. Too easy for the elite teams to recruit elite prospects then if they lose on signing day they take other teams recruits leaving teams like us screwed.
 

Jon(-24)

Senior
Nov 25, 2007
1,635
576
0
If my kid was being recruited there'd be no such thing as a school that offered him a scholarship that didn't at that same time give him financial aid agreement to sign. If they won't give you financial aid agreement, they haven't really offered you a scholarship or accepted your commitment.
 

Chico&TheMan

Freshman
Jan 25, 2012
2,703
66
0
Michigan took a commitment from an offensive lineman today, who is a line teammate of a commitment that they already had, and also a teammate of one of the top QBs in 2017.
 

hmt5000

Heisman
Aug 29, 2009
26,976
82,650
0
i dont like it but this kid committed to the previous staff and harbaugh kept his committment. so it wasn't like he "recruited" him. early signing period would go a long way to stopping this though or at least let a kid know if he's on the border of take/pass.
 

BlueRaider22

All-American
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
9,058
0
I agree with most on here. It happens all the time and it really isn't a big deal. I don't like the fact that it happened right before signing day....but it is what it is. An early signing period would be a logical step to help this.

I think too many are disillusioned to what the term "verbal commitment" means. All it pretty much means is that the two parties have agreed to date.....by no means have they agreed to get married. Not to mention that it's open dating partnership as well. Both parties are free to look for other partners during this time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theoledog

BlueRaider22

All-American
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
9,058
0
If that's Harbaugh's response to the situation then it's brilliant. I love "The Shooter".....it was an underrated movie. But the quote also speaks volumes. What it basically says is that "Don't believe everything you read and there's always more to the stories than what is reported."

There could be a lot more to this story than what is reported.
 

ukalumni00

Heisman
Jun 22, 2005
23,327
39,007
113
Its crappy, but it happens and it never seems to really damage a coach or program's reputation. After a few wins everyone forgets and all is well again. Bama, UT, UofL, everyone has done it.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113

All you will ever hear is the kid's side of what happened, maybe it went down exactly like he said, maybe UM's staff had quit contacting him hoping he would decommit and the kid didn't so they had no other choice to get him off the list. Happens a lot, UGA has quit contacting kids, when a kid decommits from UK many posters here say UK pulled away. Always 2 sides of a story, too bad for the kid he isn't going to his dream school, but he has a chance to take some officials and get a free education, this didn't happen on signing day.
 

Real Deal 2

Heisman
Jan 25, 2007
10,874
12,225
113
The more of these instances happen the better for programs like UK. Call for an early signing period in Late September to October. Great for UK but bad for big boys.

Let's hope there are a bunch of more like this and the outcry becomes huge. Hate it for the kids but hopefully the outcry will change the rules.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
All you will ever hear is the kid's side of what happened, maybe it went down exactly like he said, maybe UM's staff had quit contacting him hoping he would decommit and the kid didn't so they had no other choice to get him off the list. Happens a lot, UGA has quit contacting kids, when a kid decommits from UK many posters here say UK pulled away. Always 2 sides of a story, too bad for the kid he isn't going to his dream school, but he has a chance to take some officials and get a free education, this didn't happen on signing day.

We do not get the whole story. I agree.

But, when an offer is made and is accepted, a coach needs to avoid subtle messaging. It should not be "we want you so long as you hear from us or so long as someone better does not come along." The kid was evidently COMMITTED, something we harp on all the time as fans. If the offer was contingent and kid dropped the ball, the coach needs to be overt and tell the kid early enough so the kid can make plans.
 

Random UK Fan

All-American
Jan 5, 2010
18,714
9,936
0
All you will ever hear is the kid's side of what happened, maybe it went down exactly like he said, maybe UM's staff had quit contacting him hoping he would decommit and the kid didn't so they had no other choice to get him off the list. Happens a lot, UGA has quit contacting kids, when a kid decommits from UK many posters here say UK pulled away. Always 2 sides of a story, too bad for the kid he isn't going to his dream school, but he has a chance to take some officials and get a free education, this didn't happen on signing day.
Very true.
 

BBBLazing

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2009
4,888
4,388
0
We do not get the whole story. I agree.

But, when an offer is made and is accepted, a coach needs to avoid subtle messaging. It should not be "we want you so long as you hear from us or so long as someone better does not come along." The kid was evidently COMMITTED, something we harp on all the time as fans. If the offer was contingent and kid dropped the ball, the coach needs to be overt and tell the kid early enough so the kid can make plans.
No one is committed until signing day. Verbal "commitments" bind neither side. It is a fair relationship. The kid could bail on the school any time, including on signing day, leaving the team dry.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
We do not get the whole story. I agree.

But, when an offer is made and is accepted, a coach needs to avoid subtle messaging. It should not be "we want you so long as you hear from us or so long as someone better does not come along." The kid was evidently COMMITTED, something we harp on all the time as fans. If the offer was contingent and kid dropped the ball, the coach needs to be overt and tell the kid early enough so the kid can make plans.

The Harbaugh staff didn't make the offer, it was the Hoke staff who was all let go. So the present coach didn't accept his commitment. I have mixed feelings on it, the current staff shouldn't be forced to sign a kid they don't want, but if that was the case they should have met with him right after signing day 15 and told him he needed to look for something else, maybe he did meet with the kid and tell him that. Harbaugh can't tell his side of what happened.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
No one is committed until signing day. Verbal "commitments" bind neither side. It is a fair relationship. The kid could bail on the school any time, including on signing day, leaving the team dry.

No one is committed and then you proceed to use the phrase verbal commitments? You see the problems there, right?

Commitment is different than a signed recruit, but commitments matter to people with an ethic.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
The Harbaugh staff didn't make the offer, it was the Hoke staff who was all let go. So the present coach didn't accept his commitment. I have mixed feelings on it, the current staff shouldn't be forced to sign a kid they don't want, but if that was the case they should have met with him right after signing day 15 and told him he needed to look for something else, maybe he did meet with the kid and tell him that. Harbaugh can't tell his side of what happened.

The Harbaugh staff did not make the offer, but accepted the commitment.

I agree with most of the remainder of your post, but think Harbaugh should have conveyed his decision expressly to the kid about 2 months ago. Maybe he did. But, if he did not, I think that is bad form.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
The Harbaugh staff did not make the offer, but accepted the commitment.

I agree with most of the remainder of your post, but think Harbaugh should have conveyed his decision expressly to the kid about 2 months ago. Maybe he did. But, if he did not, I think that is bad form.

The kid has been committed to UM since 13, Harbaugh and his staff weren't there, Hoke and his staff accepted the offer. Rules prevent Harbaugh from commenting about the incident, for all we know he told the kid after signing day last year UM didn't have a spot for him and the kid held on hoping things would change. All we know is the kid says he was told a few days ago, and that's all we will ever know, his side of the story. What we are hearing is bad, but its easy to condemn someone when they can't give their side of the story. If the kid decided to bolt on signing day, unless he is bolting to our school that should be looked down on too, and happens a lot more often than this does.
 

ajgcardman

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2006
10,375
3,895
81
Must of learned it from Petrino

Or Saban. Or Meyer. Or Spurrier. Or Stoops (Bob).

Just another personal hit piece written by someone angry, jealous, or a personal vendetta against the coach or school.

All of the top coaches at top schools have done this, on multiple occasions. It's really a non-story. Kids change their minds, sometimes on signing day. Coaches do too. The bigger the name of the coach/school, the more it happens, and the less of a story it becomes.

BTW, Petrino didn't pull the offer from that Coburn kid last year, he just asked him to "gray" shirt. Turned out well for the kid. He ended up at a prestigious private school in Wake Forest (very nice degree, if he can achieve it), much closer to home, and received PT as a true freshman.

I'm sure the kid who was committed to Michigan will end up somewhere else, and there's a very good chance it will be a better "fit" for him in the long run. And that's a good thing, for all parties involved. If Michigan is not a good fit for this kid, much, much better to know now, for all involved, than to find out after enrolling. Things often change over time. Recruiting is no different. It's an unfortunate piece of big-boy recruiting, and its definitely not as rare as some writers/reporters often portray it to be.
 

Chico&TheMan

Freshman
Jan 25, 2012
2,703
66
0
The kid has been committed to UM since 13, Harbaugh and his staff weren't there, Hoke and his staff accepted the offer. Rules prevent Harbaugh from commenting about the incident, for all we know he told the kid after signing day last year UM didn't have a spot for him and the kid held on hoping things would change. All we know is the kid says he was told a few days ago, and that's all we will ever know, his side of the story. What we are hearing is bad, but its easy to condemn someone when they can't give their side of the story. If the kid decided to bolt on signing day, unless he is bolting to our school that should be looked down on too, and happens a lot more often than this does.

Just thought it was odd that an offensive lineman committed to Michigan THE DAY AFTER this story came out. It looks apparent that one's offer was pulled for the other.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
The kid has been committed to UM since 13, Harbaugh and his staff weren't there, Hoke and his staff accepted the offer. Rules prevent Harbaugh from commenting about the incident, for all we know he told the kid after signing day last year UM didn't have a spot for him and the kid held on hoping things would change. All we know is the kid says he was told a few days ago, and that's all we will ever know, his side of the story. What we are hearing is bad, but its easy to condemn someone when they can't give their side of the story. If the kid decided to bolt on signing day, unless he is bolting to our school that should be looked down on too, and happens a lot more often than this does.

The story as we know it is that Harbaugh's staff accepted him when they came on. It is common place for a staff to parse through prior recruits from the former staff and accept some and tell others they have to move on. This kid says he was told the former.

Kids bolt. No doubt. Other coaches keep recruiting and kids are making life decisions. The fact that kids bolt does not mean coaches should act like kids.

Finally, I have not condemned Harbaugh. I am saying that telling a kid 3 weeks before signing day that he does not have a scholly is just wrong. I am not saying that happened here, as only one side has been reported. Some are reporting that the kid is already committed to another school. So, maybe he had a heads-up before this week's news. I hope so.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
Or Saban. Or Meyer. Or Spurrier. Or Stoops (Bob).

Just another personal hit piece written by someone angry, jealous, or a personal vendetta against the coach or school.

All of the top coaches at top schools have done this, on multiple occasions. It's really a non-story. Kids change their minds, sometimes on signing day. Coaches do too. The bigger the name of the coach/school, the more it happens, and the less of a story it becomes.

BTW, Petrino didn't pull the offer from that Coburn kid last year, he just asked him to "gray" shirt. Turned out well for the kid. He ended up at a prestigious private school in Wake Forest (very nice degree, if he can achieve it), much closer to home, and received PT as a true freshman.

I'm sure the kid who was committed to Michigan will end up somewhere else, and there's a very good chance it will be a better "fit" for him in the long run. And that's a good thing, for all parties involved. If Michigan is not a good fit for this kid, much, much better to know now, for all involved, than to find out after enrolling. Things often change over time. Recruiting is no different. It's an unfortunate piece of big-boy recruiting, and its definitely not as rare as some writers/reporters often portray it to be.

Telling a recruit who has been committed longer than just about any kid in the class, one week before signing day, that he cannot enroll in the fall is unmitigated BS and lowlife. UL fans can put on their neck braces and rationalize by saying it was a grey shirt and not a scholly pull all day long. It was crap and exposed as such.
 

BBBLazing

All-Conference
Dec 30, 2009
4,888
4,388
0
No one is committed and then you proceed to use the phrase verbal commitments? You see the problems there, right?

Commitment is different than a signed recruit, but commitments matter to people with an ethic.
notice that "commitment" was in quotes.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
The story as we know it is that Harbaugh's staff accepted him when they came on. It is common place for a staff to parse through prior recruits from the former staff and accept some and tell others they have to move on. This kid says he was told the former.

Kids bolt. No doubt. Other coaches keep recruiting and kids are making life decisions. The fact that kids bolt does not mean coaches should act like kids.

Finally, I have not condemned Harbaugh. I am saying that telling a kid 3 weeks before signing day that he does not have a scholly is just wrong. I am not saying that happened here, as only one side has been reported. Some are reporting that the kid is already committed to another school. So, maybe he had a heads-up before this week's news. I hope so.

Since Smart came on, we have lost 7 commits, 2 yesterday. I don't think they told them they didn't have a spot on the roster, sure they could have, but one common theme from the kids is they weren't hearing from the coaching staff. Not a one of them recruited by anyone on current staff, but when Smart was hired he said he would honor all the committed guys scholarships. But kids are smart enough to realize when they aren't being contacted the new staffs aren't excited about what they bring to the table. Maybe it blows up on us and we come up way short with the class, we have about 15 deciding on signing day,will be a landfall and we could have the top class in the country or a crash and burn and maybe stay in top 20.
 

fabcat

Heisman
Apr 16, 2007
24,220
39,109
113
This is a two way street and it seems only the school gets raked over the coals when they pull an offer this close to signing day. You never here negative stories about kids that commit to a school then another school offers late and the kid flips to the other school. What is the difference? if a school is held to a standard that they have to keep the commitment, then why shouldn't the kid have to honor his commitment?
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
Yup. But, in the case of Swenson, he was hearing from the UM staff. Things evidently changed about the time of the bowl game.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
Yup. But, in the case of Swenson, he was hearing from the UM staff. Things evidently changed about the time of the bowl game.

That is still his side, I have no idea if he was or wasn't, but kids don't always tell the 100% facts. It could have just as easily been we are filling up and you need to explore your options as it was you are our number 1 guy at OL. If they lied to him up until this happened it will bite UM down the road, but if the kid hadn't signed financial aid papers with UM nothing he can do except go public.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
That is still his side, I have no idea if he was or wasn't, but kids don't always tell the 100% facts. It could have just as easily been we are filling up and you need to explore your options as it was you are our number 1 guy at OL. If they lied to him up until this happened it will bite UM down the road, but if the kid hadn't signed financial aid papers with UM nothing he can do except go public.

He committed in 2013. Do you think the new staff went silent for the past year and he just did not get the hint?
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
He committed in 2013. Do you think the new staff went silent for the past year and he just did not get the hint?

I don't know what happened, I know the new staff didn't offer or accept his commit, it was there when they arrived. Anything else out there is directly from the kid or his camp. I also know that the UM staff can't comment on what happened and we will never hear their side of what happened and I don't think its fair to crucify a coaching staff for something I don't have all the facts on. But even if he did just tell him this week. I think it would be worse if it were a kid he offered and accepted their commitment from, you have to remember that staff was fired for being inept. No different than Smart not keeping all of Richt's commitments or Stoops not keeping all of Jokers.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
If a kid remains committed for a year, I think we can accept the conclusion that the staff accepted his commitment.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
If a kid remains committed for a year, I think we can accept the conclusion that the staff accepted his commitment.

I understand you don't like UM or Harbaugh, but before I believe everything a kid who isn't happy says I would like to hear the entire story. They could have told him he wasn't in their plans a year ago and for him to make other arrangements but the kid decided to hang on hoping that would change until now, UM was his dream school. Its no different than Richt doing it at Miami, Kirby doing it at UGA or Stoops when he came to UK. Kid committed to a staff that was fired.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
I understand you don't like UM or Harbaugh, but before I believe everything a kid who isn't happy says I would like to hear the entire story. They could have told him he wasn't in their plans a year ago and for him to make other arrangements but the kid decided to hang on hoping that would change until now, UM was his dream school. Its no different than Richt doing it at Miami, Kirby doing it at UGA or Stoops when he came to UK. Kid committed to a staff that was fired.

You clearly do not understand. I love Harbaugh, but am not buying what you are selling. I cannot defy logic and you want me to suspend common sense. Won't happen.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
Just thought it was odd that an offensive lineman committed to Michigan THE DAY AFTER this story came out. It looks apparent that one's offer was pulled for the other.

Right. Seems pretty clear thats how it went down.

Right now, recruiting is nasty all around. Kids change their minds at the last second, so do schools. Its even happened after signing day on a few really nasty occasions.

An early signing period should be created. Theres really no excuse for not having one.
 

Grumpyolddawg

Heisman
Jun 11, 2001
28,372
37,112
113
You clearly do not understand. I love Harbaugh, but am not buying what you are selling. I cannot defy logic and you want me to suspend common sense. Won't happen.

Common sense tells me kids lie to make them look better in bad times, been around too many of them to take everything they say as 100% truth when it makes them look not so good. We just happen to have different opinions, it happens all the time. Peace.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,870
60,196
113
Common sense tells me kids lie to make them look better in bad times, been around too many of them to take everything they say as 100% truth when it makes them look not so good. We just happen to have different opinions, it happens all the time. Peace.

You assume a kid lied, but won't assume he was committed to Harbaugh during the year Harbaugh was coach? Even UM fans are not arguing this staff never accepted the kid as a commitment.