So, the bottom could be interesting. The most teams to ever get into the NCAA from 1 conference is 10 (IIRC). So, one has to imagine that the bottom 3 teams in the SEC tournament have to do some work to really feel comfortable getting in.
Vandy at 8 has the 5th best RPI and played the toughest schedule in the nation. They are soundly in the NCAA tournament. No doubt.
Ole Miss is 9 with an RPI at 36. Beating Vandy would guarantee that they are in, but I imagine they already are. Still, I think 1 more win makes them feel more comfortable.
From there it gets a bit weirder.
South Carolina has 13 league wins and finished 10th in the conference, but their RPI is second worst in the league, ahead of only Miss. State. So, do they reward a team with such a poor RPI, but that finished 10th in the league, or do they skip them and look at some others?
Alabama, like UK, has had kid of a weird season and they beat some teams you wouldn't think they would, like Arkansas this past weekend. Alabama has an RPI of 48 and they have 11 Q1 wins. Their strength of schedule is 8th hardest in the nation. So, will the committee reward Alabama over USC even though Alabama finished behind them? In all reality, Alabama could be in 12 place in the league and might have been but for a canceled game against Auburn.
Kentucky is 12th with 12 Q1 wins. More than a whole lot of teams, but USC has 13 and Alabama is just 1 shy at all, so even that number doesn't jump out. We do have a lot of top 25 series wins, so that is kind of impressive. Our SOS is 17th best, but the NC SOS hurts us as it is 192 compared to USC (106) and Alabama (72). Regardless, would the committee really jump the 10th and 11th best teams to let in 12th place Kentucky? How many wins would it take to make that jump?
Right now, I am almost more inclined to think that just 9 SEC teams get in, but that might depend on how the tournaments shape out.