According to Brad Wachtel the seeding Committe put a big emphasis on bad losses, KPI rating and SOS while putting less emphasis on predictive metrics. Not great news.
We have to learn to stop worrying about making the NCAAAccording to Brad Wachtel the seeding Committe put a big emphasis on bad losses, KPI rating and SOS while putting less emphasis on predictive metrics. Not great news.
No one with an iq over 60 is concerned about making the tourney. I’m trying to avoid that 8-9 line at all costs.We have to learn to stop worrying about making the NCAA
We should be past that
Discuss seeding if you like
We don’t have bad losses. Nebraska is like a semi bad loss but nothing like egregiousAccording to Brad Wachtel the seeding Committe put a big emphasis on bad losses, KPI rating and SOS while putting less emphasis on predictive metrics. Not great news.
Nebraska and temple are Q3 losses. Committee considers anything Q3 or Q4 as bad.We don’t have bad losses. Nebraska is like a semi bad loss but nothing like egregious
No, we can discuss whatever we want. This is a message board.We have to learn to stop worrying about making the NCAA
We should be past that
Discuss seeding if you like
Nebraska and temple are Q3 losses. Committee considers anything Q3 or Q4 as bad.
Still mix it in with a kpi of 40 and a mediocre SOS and it’s not great. Wish they focused on net ranking and kenpom instead.The majority of at larges have Q3 losses and some Q4
I mean Brad wachtel said it looks like they changed their values this year. I’m no expert on it but I’ll take his wordThe predictive metrics have never been really been used so dont know why Kenpom is continually brought up on the board
The committee values quality road wins the most. The quality wins always supercede bad losses
Not sure what the OP is freaking out about
Still mix it in with a kpi of 40 and a mediocre SOS and it’s not great. Wish they focused on net ranking and kenpom instead.
I mean Brad wachtel said it looks like they changed their values this year. I’m no expert on it but I’ll take his word![]()
kenpom maybe not but pretty sure net ranking was used. Anyway I’ll take brads word over yours. Sorry dude.They never did..im sorry they lied to you
There is so much parity in hoops this year, it's hard to find a team without a "wtf" loss or 2 on their resume.The majority of at larges have Q3 losses and some Q4
kenpom maybe not but pretty sure net ranking was used. Anyway I’ll take brads word over yours. Sorry dude.
I was talking about worrying needlessly,you can discuss what you want on the board if you wantNo, we can discuss whatever we want. This is a message board.
Plus, you are wrong. If Rutgers loses its last 4 games and gets bounced from the B1G, they are likely out of the tournament. So we are not "past that."
Fair enoughNo one with an iq over 60 is concerned about making the tourney. I’m trying to avoid that 8-9 line at all costs.
He’s too busy trying to be the smartest guy in the room without realizing when it comes to seeding there’s only one expert on Bacatology on these boards.The predictive metrics have never been really been used so dont know why Kenpom is continually brought up on the board
The committee values quality road wins the most. The quality wins always supercede bad losses
Not sure what the OP is freaking out about
Nebraska is improving.We don’t have bad losses. Nebraska is like a semi bad loss but nothing like egregious
Have you seen his user name?The predictive metrics have never been really been used so dont know why Kenpom is continually brought up on the board
The committee values quality road wins the most. The quality wins always supercede bad losses
Not sure what the OP is freaking out about
You know how I know you’re a troll besides the brand new account and annoying handle? You don’t say “us” or “we” - you say “Rutgers” and “they”. You ain’t a fan, a real fan - you’re a lame troll, and not particularly clever or good at it.No, we can discuss whatever we want. This is a message board.
Plus, you are wrong. If Rutgers loses its last 4 games and gets bounced from the B1G, they are likely out of the tournament. So we are not "past that."
He is the guy who had Rutgers out last year lolHe’s too busy trying to be the smartest guy in the room without realizing when it comes to seeding there’s only one expert on Bacatology on these boards.
This. Most if not all have them. Ours are not that bad.The majority of at larges have Q3 losses and some Q4
Yeah, definitely not like last year.This. Most if not all have them. Ours are not that bad.
No one with an iq over 60 is concerned about making the tourney. I’m trying to avoid that 8-9 line at all costs.
There are 4 games left. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that we win them all or lose them all. So it is not wrong to be concerned about making the tourney. Nothing is a given. Take one game at a time and keep winning.
There’s 0 percent chance that happensThere are 4 games left. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that we win them all or lose them all. So it is not wrong to be concerned about making the tourney. Nothing is a given. Take one game at a time and keep winning.